Psychometric function estimation by probabilistic classification.

Conventional psychometric function (PF) estimation involves fitting a parametric, unidimensional sigmoid to binary subject responses, which is not readily extendible to higher order PFs. This study presents a nonparametric, Bayesian, multidimensional PF estimator that also relies upon traditional binary subject responses. This technique is built upon probabilistic classification (PC), which attempts to ascertain the subdomains corresponding to each subject response as a function of multiple independent variables. Increased uncertainty in the location of class boundaries results in a greater spread in the PF estimate, which is similar to a parametric PF estimate with a lower slope. PC was evaluated on both one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) simulated auditory PFs across a variety of function shapes and sample numbers. In the 1D case, PC demonstrated equivalent performance to conventional maximum likelihood regression for the same number of simulated responses. In the 2D case, where the responses were distributed across two independent variables, PC accuracy closely matched the accuracy of 1D maximum likelihood estimation at discrete values of the second variable. The flexibility and scalability of the PC formulation make this an excellent option for estimating traditional PFs as well as more complex PFs, which have traditionally lacked rigorous estimation procedures.

[1]  T. Marill Detection theory and psychophysics , 1956 .

[2]  J. Jerger,et al.  Preferred Method For Clinical Determination Of Pure-Tone Thresholds , 1959 .

[3]  Georg v. Békésy,et al.  Hearing Theories and Complex Sounds , 1963 .

[4]  J. Halton,et al.  Algorithm 247: Radical-inverse quasi-random point sequence , 1964, CACM.

[5]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[6]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  M. Liberman,et al.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  C D Geisler,et al.  Thresholds for primary auditory fibers using statistically defined criteria. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Adaptive staircase techniques in psychoacoustics: a comparison of human data and a mathematical model. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J. Fozard,et al.  Age changes in pure-tone hearing thresholds in a longitudinal study of normal human aging. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J A Henry,et al.  Reliability and validity of high-frequency (8-20 kHz) thresholds obtained on a computer-based audiometer as compared to a documented laboratory system. , 1990, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[13]  T. Bayes An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances , 2003 .

[14]  James O. Berger,et al.  Ockham's Razor and Bayesian Analysis , 1992 .

[15]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis: Box/Bayesian , 1992 .

[16]  P. King-Smith,et al.  Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation , 1994, Vision Research.

[17]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2011 .

[18]  B. Treutwein Adaptive psychophysical procedures , 1995, Vision Research.

[19]  Christopher K. I. Williams Prediction with Gaussian Processes: From Linear Regression to Linear Prediction and Beyond , 1999, Learning in Graphical Models.

[20]  David Barber,et al.  Bayesian Classification With Gaussian Processes , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  C. Tyler,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold , 1999, Vision Research.

[22]  Jeff Miller,et al.  On the analysis of psychometric functions: The Spearman-Kärber method , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Tom Minka,et al.  Expectation Propagation for approximate Bayesian inference , 2001, UAI.

[24]  Felix Wichmann,et al.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  H Strasburger,et al.  Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  S. Klein,et al.  Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[28]  M. Leek Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Frank Jäkel,et al.  Bayesian inference for psychometric functions. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[30]  Luis A. Lesmes,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of threshold versus contrast external noise functions: The quick TvC method , 2006, Vision Research.

[31]  D. Foster,et al.  Model-free estimation of the psychometric function , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[32]  De Wet Swanepoel,et al.  Hearing assessment-reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of automated audiometry. , 2010, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[33]  Mijung Park,et al.  Active learning of neural response functions with Gaussian processes , 2011, NIPS.

[34]  Ingo Fründ,et al.  Inference for psychometric functions in the presence of nonstationary behavior. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[35]  Tomoko Matsui,et al.  Music genre classification using Gaussian Process models , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP).

[36]  D. Swanepoel,et al.  Validity of automated threshold audiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[37]  Mark A. Eckert,et al.  Classifying Human Audiometric Phenotypes of Age-Related Hearing Loss from Animal Models , 2013, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[38]  Yi Shen,et al.  Rapid estimation of high-parameter auditory-filter shapes. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  David Duvenaud,et al.  Automatic model construction with Gaussian processes , 2014 .

[40]  Mauricio A. Álvarez,et al.  A Gaussian Process Emulator for Estimating the Volume of Tissue Activated During Deep Brain Stimulation , 2015, IbPRIA.

[41]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  Fast, Continuous Audiogram Estimation Using Machine Learning , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[42]  Dan Farrell Objective Bayesian Analysis in Acoustics - Ning Xiang and Cameron Fackler , 2015 .

[43]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Perception-Based Personalization of Hearing Aids Using Gaussian Processes and Active Learning , 2015, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[44]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  Psychophysical Detection Testing with Bayesian Active Learning , 2015, UAI.

[45]  Roman Garnett,et al.  Bayesian Active Model Selection with an Application to Automated Audiometry , 2015, NIPS.