Assessing ecological sensitivities of marine assets to oil spill by means of expert knowledge

__Abstract__ Existing methodologies to assess risk due to vessel traffic often do not account for damages to marine assets in case of oil or chemical spills from ships. While some socio-economic damages can be quantified in monetary terms, expert knowledge is often the only way to assess potential damages to the marine ecology. The use of expert knowledge introduces a source of uncertainty. We propose a method which minimizes recognized flaws in subjective assessments by eliciting sensitivity ratings from multiple assessors and recognizing their differences of opinion as a source of uncertainty. We also explore various scoring options to reflect overall expert opinions. We develop and apply the methodology to the Victorian coastline in Australia and believe that improved assessment can assist policy makers of any maritime nation to make better informed decisions.

[1]  Helen M. Regan,et al.  A TAXONOMY AND TREATMENT OF UNCERTAINTY FOR ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY , 2002 .

[2]  A M Kellerer,et al.  Risk perception , 1993, Nature.

[3]  E. Thorndike.  A constant error in psychological ratings. , 1920 .

[4]  P. Legendre.  Species associations: the Kendall coefficient of concordance revisited , 2005 .

[5]  Standards New Zealand.,et al.  Risk management guidelines: companion to AS/NZS 4360:2004 , 2004 .

[6]  Sabine Knapp.  An integrated risk estimation methodology: Ship specific incident type risk , 2013 .

[7]  Bryan L. Bonner,et al.  Collective estimation: Accuracy, expertise, and extroversion as sources of intra-group influence , 2007 .

[8]  Jill M Peterson.  Environmental sensitivity index guidelines : Version 3.0 , 2002 .

[9]  R. Baker Kearfott,et al.  Introduction to Interval Analysis , 2009 .

[10]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Knowing with Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence. , 1977 .

[11]  David Parkinson,et al.  Risk: Analysis, perception and management. report of a Royal Society Study Group: Pp 201. The Royal Society. 1992. Paperback £15.50 ISBN 0 85403 467 6 , 1993 .

[12]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Problem of $m$ Rankings , 1939 .

[13]  R. Young.  The algebra of many-valued quantities , 1931 .

[14]  P. Hutchings.  A review of the Whitehouse report on the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority , 1995 .

[15]  W. Ponder,et al.  OVERVIEW OF THE CONSERVATION OF AUSTRALIAN MARINE INVERTEBRATES , 2002 .

[16]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[17]  Keith R. Hayes,et al.  Uncertainty and uncertainty analysis methods , 2011 .

[18]  Roy C. Schmidt,et al.  MANAGING DELPHI SURVEYS USING NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES , 1997 .

[19]  Ruth Beilin,et al.  Risk‐Based Approaches to Deal with Uncertainty in a Data‐Poor System: Stakeholder Involvement in Hazard Identification for Marine National Parks and Marine Sanctuaries in Victoria, Australia , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  I. Janis.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[22]  Bernd Rohrmann,et al.  Risk perception of different societal groups: Australian findings and crossnational comparisons , 1994 .