Development of acceptable quality radiation dose levels for common computed tomography examinations: A focused multicenter study in United Arab Emirates

Purpose Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) is a practical tool for radiation dose optimization, yet it does not indicate the patient size or image quality. The Acceptable Quality Dose (AQD) introduced to address the limitations of the DRLs and it is based on image quality, radiation dose, and patient weight. The aim of this study is to establish the AQD for adult patients' undergoing Computed Tomography (CT) examinations (Head, chest, abdomen). Methods This study is conducted in the four main hospitals at the Ministry of Health and Prevention. Patient information and exposure parameters were extracted. All the acceptable images are scored for their quality assessments. Data is classified as seven weight groups, <50, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, 80–89, 90–99, and ≥100 kg. The mean ± SD, median, and 75th are calculated for the CTDIvol and DLP for each weight group per examination. Results Out of 392, 358 CT examinations are scored with acceptable quality. The median CTDIvol values for the weight groups are obtained as 24.6, 25.4, 25.4, 25.0, 26.0, 27.0, and 29.0 mGy. Moreover, median DLP values are obtained as 576.7, 601.0, 616.5, 636.1, 654.0, 650.0, 780.0, and 622.5 mGy.cm, respectively, for head CT without Contrast Media (CM). Similar calculation for head CT with (CM), chest without CM, abdomen without CM, and chest and abdomen (with and without CM) CTs are presented. Conclusion Images with bad, unacceptable and higher than necessary qualities contribute to increasing patient dose and increasing the DRLs. The AQD for the selected examinations were lower than the proposed DRLs in the United Arab Emirates. The integration of image quality and patients size in the assessment of the AQD values provide effective model to compare radiation dose indices within facility and compare with others. The obtained results may be useful in terms of improving dose and the diagnostic quality in the national and international levels.

[1]  H. Tekin,et al.  Computed tomography radiation doses for common computed tomography examinations: a nationwide dose survey in United Arab Emirates , 2020, Insights into Imaging.

[2]  H. Tekin,et al.  Toward National CT Diagnostic Reference Levels in the United Arab Emirates: A Multicenter Review of CT Dose Index and Dose Area Product. , 2020, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[3]  H. Tekin,et al.  CORRIGENDUM TO: TOWARD NATIONAL CT DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS IN THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES: A MULTICENTER REVIEW OF CT DOSE INDEX AND DOSE LENGTH PRODUCT. , 2020, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[4]  Colin J. Martin,et al.  Diagnostic reference levels and optimisation in radiology: where do we go from here? , 2018, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[5]  J. Shaw,et al.  Prevalence of overweight and obesity in United Arab Emirates Expatriates: the UAE National Diabetes and Lifestyle Study , 2017, Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome.

[6]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Image noise and dose performance across a clinical population: Patient size adaptation as a metric of CT performance , 2017, Medical physics.

[7]  Madan M Rehani,et al.  Dose surveys and DRLs: critical look and way forward. , 2015, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[8]  J. Boone,et al.  Radiation Doses in Consecutive CT Examinations from Five University of California Medical Centers. , 2015, Radiology.

[9]  T. Dowdell,et al.  Identifying Institutional Diagnostic Reference Levels for CT with Radiation Dose Index Monitoring Software. , 2015, Radiology.

[10]  D. Origgi,et al.  Adult exposures from MDCT including multiphase studies: first Italian nationwide survey , 2014, European Radiology.

[11]  Samuel L Brady,et al.  Investigation of American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report 204 size-specific dose estimates for pediatric CT implementation. , 2012, Radiology.

[12]  M. McEntee,et al.  Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels in Ireland. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  C. Clement,et al.  Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging , 2017 .

[15]  C. Cyron,et al.  The evolution of radiation dose over time: Measurement of a patient cohort undergoing whole-body examinations on three computer tomography generations. , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[16]  M. Rehani,et al.  Limitations of diagnostic reference level (DRL) and introduction of acceptable quality dose (AQD). , 2015, The British journal of radiology.