Scare' Em or Disgust 'Em: The Effects of Graphic Health Promotion Messages

This study experimentally tested the effects of 2 types of content commonly found in anti-tobacco television messages—content focused on communicating a health threat about tobacco use (fear) and content containing disgust-related images—on how viewers processed these messages. In a 2 × 2 within-subjects experiment, participants watched anti-tobacco television ads that varied in the amount of fear and disgust content. The results of this study suggest that both fear and disgust content in anti-tobacco television ads have significant effects on resources allocated to encoding the messages and on recognition memory. Heart-rate data indicated that putting fear- or disgust-related content into anti-tobacco ads led to more resources allocated to encoding compared to messages without either feature. However, participants appeared to allocate fewer resources to encoding during exposure to messages featuring both fear and disgust content. Recognition was most accurate for messages that had either fear or disgust content but was significantly impaired when these 2 message attributes occurred together. The results are discussed in the context of motivated processing and recommendations about message construction are offered to campaign designers.

[1]  S. Knardahl Cardiovascular psychophysiology , 2000, Annals of medicine.

[2]  Terence A. Shimp,et al.  THE ROLE OF DISGUST AS AN EMOTIONAL MEDIATOR OF ADVERTISING EFFECTS , 2004 .

[3]  M. Allen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns , 2000, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[4]  Brian G. Southwell,et al.  Between Messages and People , 2005, Communication Research.

[5]  Qingwen Dong,et al.  The Effects of Emotional Arousal and Valence on Television Viewers' Cognitive Capacity and Memory. , 1995 .

[6]  G. Giovino,et al.  Effects of Anti-Smoking Advertising on Youth Smoking: A Review , 2003, Journal of health communication.

[7]  K Witte,et al.  Fear, threat, and perceptions of efficacy from frightening skin cancer messages. , 1998, Public health reviews.

[8]  Clark McCauley,et al.  Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors , 1994 .

[9]  Annie Lang,et al.  Sensation Seeking, Motivation, and Substance Use: A Dual System Approach , 2005 .

[10]  James Price Dillard,et al.  Rethinkin the Study of Fear Appeals: An Emotional Perspective , 1994 .

[11]  David R. Roskos-Ewoldsen,et al.  Fear appeal messages affect accessibility of attitudes toward the threat and adaptive behaviors , 2004 .

[12]  Annie Lang,et al.  WHERE PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY MEETS THE MEDIA: Taking the Effects Out of Mass Media Research , 2009 .

[13]  Daniel J. O'Keefe,et al.  Message Properties, Mediating States, and Manipulation Checks: Claims, Evidence, and Data Analysis in Experimental Persuasive Message Effects Research , 2003 .

[14]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[15]  Annie Lang,et al.  When Available Resources Become Negative Resources , 2007, Commun. Res..

[16]  J. Peter,et al.  Third-Person Perception of Television-Viewing Behavior. , 2000 .

[17]  Robin L. Nabi The theoretical versus the lay meaning of disgust: Implications for emotion research , 2002 .

[18]  M. Bradley,et al.  Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[19]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. , 1999 .

[20]  Steven Prentice-Dunn,et al.  Protection motivation theory. , 1997 .

[21]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. , 2001, Emotion.

[22]  D. Westendorf,et al.  Fear, disgust, and information processing in specific phobia: the application of signal detection theory. , 2002, Journal of anxiety disorders.

[23]  Annie Lang Using the Limited Capacity Model of Motivated Mediated Message Processing to Design Effective Cancer Communication Messages , 2006 .

[24]  Zheng Wang,et al.  Cognition and Emotion in TV Message Processing: How Valence, Arousing Content, Structural Complexity, and Information Density Affect the Availability of Cognitive Resources , 2007 .

[25]  Annie Lang,et al.  Something for Nothing: Is Visual Encoding Automatic? , 1999 .

[26]  B. Parkinson,et al.  Emotion and motivation , 1995 .

[27]  James Price Dillard,et al.  The role of fear in persuasion , 2004 .

[28]  Annie Lang,et al.  The limited capacity model of mediated message processing , 2000 .

[29]  Susan E. Morgan,et al.  Predictors of Exposure From an Antimarijuana Media Campaign: Outcome Research Assessing Sensation Seeking Targeting , 2002, Health communication.

[30]  Paul D. Bolls,et al.  The Effects of Message Valence and Listener Arousal on Attention, Memory, and Facial Muscular Responses to Radio Advertisements , 2001, Commun. Res..

[31]  Samuel D. Bradley Examining the Eyeblink Startle Reflex as a Measure of Emotion and Motivation to Television Programming , 2007 .

[32]  K. Witte Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model , 1992 .

[33]  Robin L. Nabi,et al.  The Persuasive Influence of Emotion in Cancer Prevention and Detection Messages , 2006 .

[34]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: Behavior, feeling, and physiology , 2000 .

[35]  G. Ye,et al.  Brand equity: extending brand awareness and liking with Signal Detection Theory , 2004 .

[36]  Bertram Walter,et al.  Psychophysiological Correlates of Disgust and Disgust Sensitivity , 2005 .

[37]  Bethany A. Teachman,et al.  Intersection of Disgust and Fear: Normative and Pathological Views , 2006 .

[38]  V. Curtis,et al.  Dirt, Disgust, and Disease: Is Hygiene in Our Genes? , 2001, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[39]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Psychobiology and Social Psychology: Past, Present, and Future , 2000, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[40]  K. Clark Looking at Pictures , 1960 .