When Children Ask, “What Is It?” What Do They Want to Know About Artifacts?

When children ask, “What is it?” are they seeking information about what something is called or what kind of thing it is? To find out, we gave 2-, 3-, and 4-year-olds (32 at each age) the opportunity to inquire about unfamiliar artifacts. An ambiguous question was answered with a name or with functional information, depending on the group to which the children were assigned. Children were inclined to follow up with additional questions about the object when they had been told its name, but seemed satisfied with the answer when they had been told the object's function. Moreover, children in the name condition tended to substitute questions about function for ambiguous questions over the course of the session. These results indicate that children are motivated to discover what kinds of things novel artifacts are, and that young children, like adults, conceive of artifact kinds in terms of their functions.

[1]  D. K. Nelson,et al.  Principle-Based Inferences in Young Children's Categorization: Revisiting the Impact of Function on the Naming of Artifacts. , 1995 .

[2]  D. Dennett.  The Intentional Stance. , 1987 .

[3]  David M. Sobel,et al.  Detecting blickets: how young children use information about novel causal powers in categorization and induction. , 2000, Child development.

[4]  Deborah Kelemen,et al.  The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children , 1999, Cognition.

[5]  V. Gathercole,et al.  Function as a criterion for the extension of new words. , 2001, Journal of child language.

[6]  F. Keil.  Mapping the mind: The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things , 1994 .

[7]  Susan C. Johnson,et al.  Function and the Origins of the Design Stance , 2002 .

[8]  D. G. Kemler Nelson,et al.  How Children and Adults Name Broken Objects: Inferences and Reasoning About Design Intentions in the Categorization of Artifacts , 2002 .

[9]  L. Rips.  Similarity, typicality, and categorization , 1989 .

[10]  Paul Bloom,et al.  Young children are sensitive to how an object was created when deciding what to name it , 2000, Cognition.

[11]  D. K. Nelson,et al.  Young children's use of functional information to categorize artifacts: three factors that matter , 2000, Cognition.

[12]  L. Markson,et al.  Children's Reliance on Creator's Intent in Extending Names for Artifacts , 2003, Psychological science.

[13]  E. Markman,et al.  Categories and induction in young children , 1986, Cognition.

[14]  S. Waxman,et al.  Word learning is ‘smart’: evidence that conceptual information affects preschoolers' extension of novel words , 2002, Cognition.

[15]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[16]  Susan Carey,et al.  Developmental changes within the core of artifact concepts , 2001, Cognition.

[17]  D. H. Dodd,et al.  Early word meanings: perceptually or functionally based? , 1980, Child development.

[18]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Dedre Gentner A STUDY OF EARLY WORD MEANING USING ARTIFICIAL OBJECTS : WHAT LOOKS LIKE A JIGGY BUT ACTS LIKE A ZIMBO ? , 2004 .

[19]  W. Merriman,et al.  An appearance-function shift in children's object naming , 1993, Journal of Child Language.

[20]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Naming in young children: a dumb attentional mechanism? , 1996, Cognition.

[21]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Words, thoughts, and theories , 1997 .

[22]  Nell K. Duke,et al.  Two-year-olds will name artifacts by their functions. , 2000, Child development.

[23]  K. Nelson.  Concept, word, and sentence: Interrelations in acquisition and development. , 1974 .

[24]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  What looks like a jiggy but acts like a zimbo?: A study of early word meaning using artificial objects , 1978 .

[25]  E. Markman,et al.  Young children's inductions from natural kinds: the role of categories and appearances. , 1987, Child development.

[26]  M. Minami.  How Children Learn the Meanings of Words , 2001 .

[27]  L. D. Williams,et al.  Preschoolers' and adults' reliance on object shape and object function for lexical extension. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[28]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Object Shape, Object Function, and Object Name , 1998 .

[29]  D. K. Nelson,et al.  Attention to functional properties in toddlers' naming and problem-solving * , 1999 .

[30]  V. Gathercole,et al.  Ontological categories and function: Acquisition of new names , 1995 .