High affinity restricts the localization and tumor penetration of single-chain fv antibody molecules.

Antitumor monoclonal antibodies must bind to tumor antigens with high affinity to achieve durable tumor retention. This has spurred efforts to generate high affinity antibodies for use in cancer therapy. However, it has been hypothesized that very high affinity interactions between antibodies and tumor antigens may impair efficient tumor penetration of the monoclonal antibodies and thus diminish effective in vivo targeting (K. Fujimori et al., J. Nucl. Med., 31: 1191-1198, 1990). Here we show that intrinsic affinity properties regulate the quantitative delivery of antitumor single-chain Fv (scFv) molecules to solid tumors and the penetration of scFv from the vasculature into tumor masses. In biodistribution studies examining a series of radioiodinated scFv mutants with affinities ranging from 10(-7)-10(-11) M, quantitative tumor retention did not significantly increase with enhancements in affinity beyond 10(-9) M. Similar distribution patterns were observed when the scFv were evaluated in the absence of renal clearance in anephric mice, indicating that the rapid renal clearance of the scFv was not responsible for these observations. IHC and IF evaluations of tumor sections after the i.v. administration of scFv affinity mutants revealed that the lowest affinity molecule exhibited diffuse tumor staining whereas the highest affinity scFv was primarily retained in the perivascular regions of the tumor. These results indicate that antibody-based molecules with extremely high affinity have impaired tumor penetration properties that must be considered in the design of antibody-based cancer therapies.

[1]  J. Schlom,et al.  Radioimmunolocalization of human carcinoma xenografts with B72.3 second generation monoclonal antibodies. , 1988, Cancer research.

[2]  K. Fujimori,et al.  Modeling analysis of the global and microscopic distribution of immunoglobulin G, F(ab')2, and Fab in tumors. , 1989, Cancer research.

[3]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Micropharmacology of monoclonal antibodies in solid tumors: direct experimental evidence for a binding site barrier. , 1992, Cancer research.

[4]  H. Mendonca,et al.  Comparisons between two monoclonal antibodies that bind to the same antigen but have differing affinities: uptake kinetics and 125I-antibody therapy efficacy in multicell spheroids. , 1992, Cancer research.

[5]  D. Maloney Preclinical and phase I and II trials of rituximab. , 1999, Seminars in oncology.

[6]  P. Trail,et al.  Cure of xenografted human carcinomas by BR96-doxorubicin immunoconjugates. , 1993, Science.

[7]  G. Adams,et al.  Prolonged in vivo tumour retention of a human diabody targeting the extracellular domain of human HER2/neu. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4 , 1970, Nature.

[9]  I. Bernstein,et al.  Radiolabeled-antibody therapy of B-cell lymphoma with autologous bone marrow support. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  R K Jain,et al.  Mechanisms of heterogeneous distribution of monoclonal antibodies and other macromolecules in tumors: significance of elevated interstitial pressure. , 1988, Cancer research.

[11]  G. Adams,et al.  Isolation of picomolar affinity anti-c-erbB-2 single-chain Fv by molecular evolution of the complementarity determining regions in the center of the antibody binding site. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  J. Mendelsohn,et al.  Therapeutic application of anti‐growth factor receptor antibodies , 1998, Current opinion in oncology.

[13]  J N Weinstein,et al.  A modeling analysis of monoclonal antibody percolation through tumors: a binding-site barrier. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  D Tripathy,et al.  Phase II study of receptor-enhanced chemosensitivity using recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2/neu monoclonal antibody plus cisplatin in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer refractory to chemotherapy treatment. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  L L Houston,et al.  Highly specific in vivo tumor targeting by monovalent and divalent forms of 741F8 anti-c-erbB-2 single-chain Fv. , 1993, Cancer research.

[16]  S. Batra,et al.  Charge-modified single chain antibody constructs of monoclonal antibody CC49: generation, characterization, pharmacokinetics, and biodistribution analysis. , 1999, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[17]  R K Jain,et al.  Physiological barriers to delivery of monoclonal antibodies and other macromolecules in tumors. , 1990, Cancer research.

[18]  G. Adams,et al.  Increased affinity leads to improved selective tumor delivery of single-chain Fv antibodies. , 1998, Cancer research.

[19]  J. Huston,et al.  In vitro and in vivo characterization of a human anti-c-erbB-2 single-chain Fv isolated from a filamentous phage antibody library. , 1995, Immunotechnology : an international journal of immunological engineering.

[20]  E. Vitetta,et al.  Redesigning nature's poisons to create anti-tumor reagents. , 1987, Science.