Impact of dust particle non‐sphericity on climate simulations

Although mineral aerosol (dust) particles are irregular in shape, they are treated as homogeneous spheres in climate model radiative transfer calculations. Here, we test the effect of dust particle non-sphericity in the ECHAM5.5-HAM2 global aerosol-climate model. The short-wave optical properties of the two insoluble dust modes in HAM2 are modelled using an ensemble of spheroids that has been optimized to reproduce the optical properties of dust-like aerosols, thereby providing a significant improvement over spheres. First, the direct radiative effects (DRE) of dust non-sphericity were evaluated diagnostically, by comparing spheroids with both volume-equivalent and volume-to-area (V/A) equivalent spheres. In the volume-equivalent case, the short-wave DRE of insoluble dust at the surface and at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) was slightly smaller (typically by 3-4%) for spheroidal than for spherical dust particles. This rather small difference stems from compensating non-sphericity effects on the dust optical thickness and asymmetry parameter. In the V/A-equivalent case, the difference in optical thickness was virtually eliminated and the DRE at the TOA (surface) was approximate to 20% (approximate to 13%) smaller for spheroids than for spheres, due to a larger asymmetry parameter. Even then, however, the global-mean DRE of non-sphericity was only 0.055 W m(-2) at the TOA and 0.070 W m(-2) at the surface. Subsequently, the effects of dust non-sphericity were tested interactively in simulations in which ECHAM5.5-HAM2 was coupled to a mixed-layer ocean model. Consistent with the rather small radiative effects noted above, the climatic differences from simulations with spherical dust optics were generally negligible.

[1]  Thomas C. Grenfell,et al.  Representation Of A Nonspherical Ice Particle By A Collection Of Independent Spheres For Scattering And Absorption Of Radiation : 2 . Hexagonal Columns And Plates , 2003 .

[2]  K. Tsigaridis,et al.  Estimating the direct and indirect effects of secondary organic aerosols using ECHAM5-HAM , 2011 .

[3]  O. Boucher,et al.  The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM , 2004 .

[4]  M. Kahnert,et al.  Uncertainties in measured and modelled asymmetry parameters of mineral dust aerosols , 2006 .

[5]  M. Kahnert,et al.  Mie simulations as an error source in mineral aerosol radiative forcing calculations , 2007 .

[6]  Thomas C. Grenfell,et al.  Representation of a nonspherical ice particle by a collection of independent spheres for scattering , 1999 .

[7]  Yiran Peng,et al.  An improvement on the dust emission scheme in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM , 2007 .

[8]  Jean-François Léon,et al.  Application of spheroid models to account for aerosol particle nonsphericity in remote sensing of desert dust , 2006 .

[9]  P. Forster,et al.  Impact of an improved shortwave radiation scheme in the MAECHAM5 General Circulation Model , 2007 .

[10]  Martin Wirth,et al.  Airborne measurements of dust layer properties, particle size distribution and mixing state of Saharan dust during SAMUM 2006 , 2009 .

[11]  T. Nousiainen,et al.  Comparison of measured single-scattering matrix of feldspar particles with T-matrix simulations using spheroids , 2003 .

[12]  Irina N. Sokolik,et al.  Incorporation of mineralogical composition into models of the radiative properties of mineral aerosol from UV to IR wavelengths , 1999 .

[13]  U. Lohmann,et al.  A parameterization of cirrus cloud formation: Homogeneous freezing of supercooled aerosols , 2002 .

[14]  W. Collins,et al.  An AeroCom Initial Assessment - Optical Properties in Aerosol Component Modules of Global Models , 2005 .

[15]  Noise due to the Monte Carlo independent‐column approximation: short‐term and long‐term impacts in ECHAM5 , 2008 .

[16]  Luis Kornblueh,et al.  Sensitivity of Simulated Climate to Horizontal and Vertical Resolution in the ECHAM5 Atmosphere Model , 2006 .

[17]  Olga V. Kalashnikova,et al.  Ability of multiangle remote sensing observations to identify and distinguish mineral dust types : Optical models and retrievals of optically thick plumes : Quantifying the radiative and biogeochemical impacts of mineral dust , 2005 .

[18]  U. Lohmann,et al.  The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2: sensitivity to improvements in process representations , 2012 .

[19]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Observationally constrained estimates of carbonaceous aerosol radiative forcing , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  M. Heimann,et al.  Impact of vegetation and preferential source areas on global dust aerosol: Results from a model study , 2002 .

[21]  Timo Nousiainen,et al.  Optical modeling of mineral dust particles: A review , 2009 .

[22]  S. Ghan,et al.  A parameterization of aerosol activation: 2. Multiple aerosol types , 2000 .

[23]  Hester Volten,et al.  Aerosol retrievals from AVHRR radiances: effects of particle nonsphericity and absorption and an updated long-term global climatology of aerosol properties , 2003 .

[24]  Ping Yang,et al.  Radiative transfer simulation of dust-like aerosols: Uncertainties from particle shape and refractive index , 2010 .

[25]  M. Kahnert,et al.  Modelling light scattering by mineral dust using spheroids : assessment of applicability , 2011 .

[26]  A Lacis,et al.  Climate forcings in the industrial era. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  J. Wilson,et al.  M7: An efficient size‐resolved aerosol microphysics module for large‐scale aerosol transport models , 2004 .

[28]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Aerosols, Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle , 2001, Science.

[29]  G. d’Almeida,et al.  On the variability of desert aerosol radiative characteristics , 1987 .

[30]  Timo Nousiainen,et al.  Light scattering modeling of small feldspar aerosol particles using polyhedral prisms and spheroids , 2006 .

[31]  Luis Kornblueh,et al.  The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5 Part II: Sensitivity of simulated climate to horizontal and vertical resolution , 2004 .

[32]  M. Kahnert,et al.  Sensitivity of the shortwave radiative effect of dust on particle shape: Comparison of spheres and spheroids , 2012 .

[33]  T. Eck,et al.  Variability of Absorption and Optical Properties of Key Aerosol Types Observed in Worldwide Locations , 2002 .

[34]  Irina N. Sokolik,et al.  Direct radiative forcing by anthropogenic airborne mineral aerosols , 1996, Nature.

[35]  M. Mishchenko,et al.  Modeling phase functions for dustlike tropospheric aerosols using a shape mixture of randomly oriented polydisperse spheroids , 1997 .

[36]  Gunnar Myhre,et al.  Global sensitivity experiments of the radiative forcing due to mineral aerosols , 2001 .

[37]  Barbara E. Carlson,et al.  Nonsphericity of dust‐like tropospheric aerosols: Implications for aerosol remote sensing and climate modeling , 1995 .

[38]  C. Timmreck,et al.  Monthly Averages of Aerosol Properties: A Global Comparison Among Models, Satellite Data, and AERONET Ground Data , 2003 .

[39]  Hester Volten,et al.  Scattering matrices of mineral aerosol particles at 441.6 nm and 632.8 nm , 2001 .

[40]  Qiang Fu,et al.  Test of Mie-based single-scattering properties of non-spherical dust aerosols in radiative flux calculations , 2009 .

[41]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  Full year cycle of desert dust spectral optical thickness and precipitable water vapor over Alexandria, Egypt , 2001 .

[42]  Jeffrey S. Reid,et al.  An Assessment of the Surface Longwave Direct Radiative Effect of Airborne Saharan Dust During the NAMMA Field Campaign , 2010 .

[43]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Cloud microphysics and aerosol indirect effects in the global climate model ECHAM5-HAM , 2007 .

[44]  Arve Kylling,et al.  Radiance and flux simulations for mineral dust aerosols: Assessing the error due to using spherical or spheroidal model particles , 2004 .