An alternative approach to decompose the potential gains from mergers

Abstract Bogetoft and Wang proposed admirable production economic models to estimate and decompose the potential gains from mergers. They provided a good platform to quantify the merger efficiency and related it to relevant organisational changes ex-ante. In this paper, we develop an alternative approach to decompose the potential overall gains from mergers into to technical effect, size effect, and harmony effect. The proposed approach uses strongly efficient projections, and consistently calculates radial input-based measures for these three effects based on the pre-merger aggregated inputs. In addition, the proposed approach is of vital significance in two special cases where the aggregated projected inputs are not proportional to the pre-merger aggregated inputs and where the production sizes are very different for the original decision-making units. Finally, an application to the City Commercial Banks (CCBs) in China is provided to illustrate the usefulness and efficacy of the proposed approach. The application shows that there exist significant merger efficiency gains for these top 20 CCBs. Further, both the technical effect and harmony effect favour mergers, whereas the size effect would work against most mergers. Thus, in most cases the full-size merger with “organisational sense” is not proper.

[1]  Jie Wu,et al.  Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA , 2014 .

[2]  Jean-Philippe Boussemart,et al.  Measuring potential gains from specialization under non-convex technologies , 2011, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[3]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Returns to Scale in DEA , 2011 .

[4]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  Efficiency and Merger Gains in the Danish Forestry Extension Service , 2001 .

[5]  Antonio Peyrache,et al.  Industry structural inefficiency and potential gains from mergers and break-ups: A comprehensive approach , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory and Techniques for Economics and Operations Research , 2004 .

[7]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  Potential gains from hospital mergers in Denmark , 2010, Health care management science.

[8]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  Estimating the Potential Gains from Mergers , 2005 .

[9]  Jean-Philippe Boussemart,et al.  Potential gains from specialization and diversification further to the reorganization of activities , 2016 .

[10]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[11]  Subhash C. Ray Data Envelopment Analysis: Contents , 2004 .

[12]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Handbook on data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[13]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Bi‐level Programing Merger Evaluation and Application to Banking Operations , 2016 .

[14]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Serial Chain Merger Evaluation Model and Application to Mortgage Banking , 2012, Decis. Sci..

[15]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[16]  Necmiddin Bagdadioglu,et al.  Measuring Potential Gains from Mergers among Electricity Distribution Companies in Tiirkey using a Non-Parametric Model , 2006 .

[17]  Yongjun Li,et al.  Estimation of potential gains from bank mergers: A novel two-stage cost efficiency DEA model , 2017, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[18]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Estimation of potential gains from mergers in multiple periods: a comparison of stochastic frontier analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis , 2011, Ann. Oper. Res..

[19]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .