Satellite-view biases in retrieved surface temperatures in mountain areas

Abstract Ground surface temperatures retrieved from satellite data taken in mountain areas may have biases that depend strongly on the satellite viewing angle and the time of clay. Biases occur whenever there is a correlation between the viewing angle and the temperatures of subpixel mountainsides, such as when the satellite's view directly faces the most brightly sunlit slopes. This paper reports simulations of this satellite-view bias effect for mountain terrain in central and southwestern Colorado and the southern Sierra Nevada in California. Surface temperatures for the simulations were computed by using a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model with a parameterization for terrain features that are at a scale finer than. the model grid resolution. The representation of terrain in the simulations was based on elevation. data with high resolution (30 m) from U.S. Geological Survey Digital Elevation. Map data sets. Biases as large as 9 C° were found while assuming a satellite sensor resolution of 14 km. Even larger biases were found with finer sensor resolutions. These biases are substantially larger than those that had previously been found from modeling with terrain data at about 90 m -resolution (3″ latitude/longitude) from the Defense Mapping Agency. The simulations suggest that satellite-view; biases could cause substantial local errors when surface temperature retrievals are used for climate diagnosis, weather analysis, soil moisture estimation, or geologic mapping.

[1]  Daniel S. Kimes,et al.  Directional radiometric measurements of row-crop temperatures , 1983 .

[2]  Z. Li,et al.  Feasibility of land surface temperature and emissivity determination from AVHRR data , 1993 .

[3]  S. Idso,et al.  The utility of surface temperature measurements for the remote sensing of surface soil water status , 1975 .

[4]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  A Test of an Upstream Spline Interpolation Technique for the Advective Terms in a Numerical Mesoscale Model , 1978 .

[5]  T. Takashima,et al.  Emissivities of quartz and Sahara dust powders in the infrared region (7–17 μ) , 1987 .

[6]  A. Goetz,et al.  Thermal inertia imaging: A new geologic mapping tool , 1976 .

[7]  Robert H. Woodward,et al.  Soil moisture estimation using GOES-VISSR infrared data - A case study with a simple statistical method , 1987 .

[8]  A. Lipton.  Effects of Slope and Aspect Variations on Satellite Surface Temperature Retrievals and Mesoscale Analysis in Mountainous Terrain , 1992 .

[9]  J. Dozier,et al.  Land-surface temperature measurement from space: physical principles and inverse modeling , 1989 .

[10]  Piers J. Sellers,et al.  A Review of Satellite Data Algorithms for Studies of the Land Surface , 1990 .

[11]  George R. Diak,et al.  Improvements to models and methods for evaluating the land-surface energy balance and ‘effective’ roughness using radiosonde reports and satellite-measured ‘skin’ temperature data , 1993 .

[12]  José A. Sobrino,et al.  Thermal infrared radiance model for interpreting the directional radiometric temperature of a vegetative surface , 1990 .

[13]  R. Pielke,et al.  Diurnal Boundary-Layer Development over Sloping Terrain , 1981 .

[14]  J. Norman,et al.  Thermal Emissivity And Infrared Temperature Dependence On Plant Canopy Architecture And View Angle , 1990, 10th Annual International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  J. T. Suttles,et al.  Longwave surface radiation over the globe from satellite data - An error analysis , 1993 .

[16]  J. C. Price.  The potential of remotely sensed thermal infrared data to infer surface soil moisture and evaporation , 1980 .