Extreme start-up response of LLC converters using average geometric control

Resonant power converters have become ubiquitous to efficiently process electrical energy, however, their complicated structure challenges linear controllers in anticipating their large signal performance. Since small-signal modeling techniques do not provide sufficient information regarding the large signal behavior of power converters, nonlinear geometric controllers can be employed to tackle the poor large signal dynamic response. In this paper, a nonlinear controller called the average geometric controller is introduced for the LLC converter with the ability of providing an extreme start-up dynamic response and eliminate overshoot. A novel average large signal model is developed and serves as the foundations to develop the average geometric controller for LLC converters. The average large signal model significantly simplifies the large-signal behavior analysis and results in obtaining the average circular trajectories of the LLC converter. In order to validate the theoretical analysis, experimental and simulation results of a 500W prototype LLC converter employing the average geometric controller are presented. The experimental results show a significant increase in start-up performance while the overshoot is eliminated.

[1]  Martin Ordonez,et al.  Fast transient response of series resonant converter using an average large signal model , 2015, 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[2]  Martin Ordonez,et al.  Fast Transient Response of Series Resonant Converters Using Average Geometric Control , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[3]  Wuhua Li,et al.  Asymmetrical Duty Cycle-Controlled LLC Resonant Converter With Equivalent Switching Frequency Doubler , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[4]  H.S.-H. Chung,et al.  Fixed-Frequency Boundary Control of Buck Converter With Second-Order Switching Surface , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[5]  John E. Quaicoe,et al.  Selection of a curved switching surface for buck converters , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[6]  G. Moon,et al.  A New LLC Series Resonant Converter with a Narrow Switching Frequency Variation and Reduced Conduction Losses , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[7]  Paresh C. Sen,et al.  Bang-Bang Charge Control for LLC Resonant Converters , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[8]  Xiaoqiang Guo,et al.  Interleaved Boost-Integrated LLC Resonant Converter With Fixed-Frequency PWM Control for Renewable Energy Generation Applications , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[9]  Zhijian Fang,et al.  Optimal Design Methodology for LLC Resonant Converter in Battery Charging Applications Based on Time-Weighted Average Efficiency , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[10]  Martin Ordonez,et al.  PWM-Geometric Modeling and Centric Control of Basic DC–DC Topologies for Sleek and Reliable Large-Signal Response , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[11]  Gang Yang,et al.  Double-Phase High-Efficiency, Wide Load Range High- Voltage/Low-Voltage LLC DC/DC Converter for Electric/Hybrid Vehicles , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[12]  P.T. Krein,et al.  Minimum-Time Transient Recovery for DC–DC Converters Using Raster Control Surfaces , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[13]  Jae-Hyun Kim,et al.  A Novel Accurate Primary-Side Control (PSC) Method for Half-Bridge (HB) LLC Converter , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.