Abstract The performance of low-cost commercially available polymeric humidity sensors has been compared to that of prototype thick- and thin-film polymer-based sensors that will be optimized for improved performance at low relative humidity (RH). The commercially available humidity sensors examined include polymeric capacitive and resistive types. The prototype sensors utilize both thick- and thin-film interdigitated electrodes, on quartz and ceramic substrates, with polyimide sensing films. Both capacitive and surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensing mechanisms have been studied for the thin-film structure. The commercial capacitive microsensors have a linear response in the range 5–95% RH. The resistive sensors are non linear, but the signal-conditioning circuit can be modified for improved sensitivity in a particular RH range. The prototype thick-film sensor has a non-linear response, while the response of the thin-film prototype sensor is comparable to that of the commercial capacitive microsensors. The SAW sensor has the potential for higher sensitivity than the commercial capacitive microsensors, but is less linear.
[1]
Yoshiro Sakai,et al.
A thin-film polysulfone-based capacitive-type relative-humidity sensor
,
1993
.
[2]
Henry Baltes,et al.
Humidity sensing properties and electrical permittivity of new photosensitive polyimides
,
1991
.
[3]
David Galipeau,et al.
A surface acoustic wave sensor study of polyimide thin film surface treatments - effect on water uptake
,
1994
.
[4]
Yong-Ho Lee,et al.
Fabrication of porous polymeric film for humidity sensing
,
1993
.
[5]
S. Joshi,et al.
A study of polymer/water interactions using surface acoustic waves☆
,
1988
.
[6]
Yoshiro Sakai,et al.
Humidity sensors using chemically modified polymeric materials
,
1993
.
[7]
J. Vetelino,et al.
Measurement of relative adhesion and surface properties of polyimide films using a surfce acoustic wave sensor
,
1993
.