Foresight Study on the Risk Governance of New Technologies: The Case of Nanotechnology

Technology‐led innovation represents an important driver of European economic and industrial competitiveness and offers solutions to societal challenges. In order to facilitate responsible innovation and public acceptance, a need exists to identify and implement oversight approaches focused on the effective risk governance of emerging technologies. This article describes a foresight study on the governance of new technologies, using nanotechnology as a case example. Following a mapping of the governance landscape, four plausible foresight scenarios were developed, capturing critical uncertainties for nanotechnology governance. Key governance elements were then stress tested within these scenarios to see how well they might perform in a range of possible futures and to inform identification of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for nanotechnology governance in Europe. Based on the study outcomes, recommendations are proposed regarding the development of governance associated with the responsible development of new technologies.

[1]  Lynn L. Bergeson,et al.  Sustainable Nanomaterials: Emerging Governance Systems , 2013 .

[2]  Milind Kandlikar,et al.  From cradle-to-grave at the nanoscale: gaps in U.S. regulatory oversight along the nanomaterial life cycle. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Norberto Patrignani,et al.  Ethical Governance of Emerging Technologies Development , 2013 .

[4]  P. Schaper-Rinkel,et al.  The role of future-oriented technology analysis in the governance of emerging technologies: The example of nanotechnology , 2013 .

[5]  B. Hugman,et al.  Protecting the People? , 2012, Drug Safety.

[6]  Barbara Herr Harthorn,et al.  Governance implications of nanomaterials companies’ inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[7]  R. Falkner,et al.  Regulating Nanotechnologies: Risk, Uncertainty and the Global Governance Gap , 2012, Global Environmental Politics.

[8]  Steffen Foss Hansen,et al.  NANOTECHNOLOGY AND HUMAN HEALTH: SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AND RISK GOVERNANCE , 2011 .

[9]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  The long view of nanotechnology development: the National Nanotechnology Initiative at 10 years , 2011 .

[10]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Missing links in nanomaterials governance: bringing industrial dynamics and downstream policies into view , 2011 .

[11]  L. Bergeson.  Emerging Nanomaterial Governance Systems: The State of Play , 2011, Molecular imaging.

[12]  Terje Aven,et al.  Risk Management and Governance: Concepts, Guidelines and Applications , 2010 .

[13]  Christian E. H. Beaudrie,et al.  Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[14]  John Pendergrass,et al.  Securing the promise of nanotechnologies: towards transatlantic regulatory cooperation. Report , 2009 .

[15]  G. Hodge,et al.  ‘Governing’ nanotechnology without government? , 2008 .

[16]  Fern Wickson,et al.  Models of governance for converging technologies , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[17]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Sustainable governance of emerging technologies—Critical constellations in the agent network of nanotechnology , 2007 .

[18]  Mihail C Roco,et al.  Progress in Governance of Converging Technologies Integrated from the Nanoscale , 2006, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Graham H. May.  The Sixth Sense: Accelerating Organizational Learning with Scenarios , 2003 .

[20]  G. Ringland.  Scenario Planning: Managing for the Future , 1998 .

[21]  Lutz E. Schlange.  Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[22]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Value-sensitive design , 1996, INTR.

[23]  R. Fildes.  Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[24]  D. Woolley,et al.  The white paper , 1943, Public Health.

[25]  FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT , THE COUNCIL , THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Digitising European Industry Reaping the full benefits of a Digital Single Market , 2016 .

[26]  Sabine Maasen,et al.  Governing Future Technologies : Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime , 2010 .

[27]  L. Paddock.  An Integrated Approach to Nanotechnology Governance , 2010 .

[28]  R. Falkner,et al.  Securing the Promise of Nanotechnologies , 2009 .

[29]  John C. Monica,et al.  Considerations for Implementation of Manufactured Nanomaterial Policy and Governance , 2009 .

[30]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Gearing European Research Towards Sustainability: RD4SD Exercise , 2009 .

[31]  Risto Karinen,et al.  Toward Anticipatory Governance: The Experience with Nanotechnology , 2009 .

[32]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Nanotechnology Risk Governance , 2008 .

[33]  COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS , 2009 .

[34]  Olga Amsterdamska,et al.  Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology , 2007 .

[35]  George Gaskell,et al.  Europeans and biotechnology in 2002 - Eurobarometer 58.0 : A report to the EC Directorate General for Research from the project "Life Sciences in European Society" , 2003 .

[36]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods , 2002 .