Quality control in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

Mass spectrometry is a highly complex analytical technique and mass spectrometry-based proteomics experiments can be subject to a large variability, which forms an obstacle to obtaining accurate and reproducible results. Therefore, a comprehensive and systematic approach to quality control is an essential requirement to inspire confidence in the generated results. A typical mass spectrometry experiment consists of multiple different phases including the sample preparation, liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatics stages. We review potential sources of variability that can impact the results of a mass spectrometry experiment occurring in all of these steps, and we discuss how to monitor and remedy the negative influences on the experimental results. Furthermore, we describe how specialized quality control samples of varying sample complexity can be incorporated into the experimental workflow and how they can be used to rigorously assess detailed aspects of the instrument performance.

[1]  John R Yates,et al.  Proteomics of Pyrococcus furiosus (Pfu): Identification of Extracted Proteins by Three Independent Methods. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[2]  L. Martens,et al.  Getting intimate with trypsin, the leading protease in proteomics. , 2013, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[3]  Michael S Bereman,et al.  Tools for monitoring system suitability in LC MS/MS centric proteomic experiments , 2015, Proteomics.

[4]  M. Mann,et al.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Albert Sickmann,et al.  Quality control of nano‐LC‐MS systems using stable isotope‐coded peptides , 2011, Proteomics.

[6]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Inhibition of protein carbamylation in urea solution using ammonium-containing buffers. , 2014, Analytical biochemistry.

[7]  Dieter Deforce,et al.  iTRAQ as a method for optimization: Enhancing peptide recovery after gel fractionation , 2014, Proteomics.

[8]  M. Mann,et al.  The abc's (and xyz's) of peptide sequencing , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[9]  J. Garin,et al.  Peptide storage: are you getting the best return on your investment? Defining optimal storage conditions for proteomics samples. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[10]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function , 2016, Nature.

[12]  Matthew E Monroe,et al.  In-source fragmentation and the sources of partially tryptic peptides in shotgun proteomics. , 2013, Journal of Proteome Research.

[13]  Lennart Martens,et al.  Bringing proteomics into the clinic: The need for the field to finally take itself seriously , 2013, Proteomics. Clinical applications.

[14]  Costel C. Darie,et al.  Identification of consistent alkylation of cysteine-less peptides in a proteomics experiment. , 2012, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[15]  Robert J Beynon,et al.  QCAL—a novel standard for assessing instrument conditions for proteome analysis , 2008, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[16]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  SIMPATIQCO: A Server-Based Software Suite Which Facilitates Monitoring the Time Course of LC–MS Performance Metrics on Orbitrap Instruments , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[17]  A. Nesvizhskii,et al.  Metrics for the Human Proteome Project 2015: Progress on the Human Proteome and Guidelines for High-Confidence Protein Identification. , 2015, Journal of proteome research.

[18]  Darryl B. Hardie,et al.  A quantitative study of the effects of chaotropic agents, surfactants, and solvents on the digestion efficiency of human plasma proteins by trypsin. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[19]  Juan-Pablo Albar,et al.  Standardization and quality control in proteomics. , 2013, Journal of proteomics.

[20]  Karen Phinney,et al.  A proteomics performance standard to support measurement quality in proteomics , 2012, Proteomics.

[21]  Robertson Craig,et al.  Open source system for analyzing, validating, and storing protein identification data. , 2004, Journal of proteome research.

[22]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  DIGESTIF: a universal quality standard for the control of bottom-up proteomics experiments. , 2015, Journal of proteome research.

[23]  B. Domon,et al.  A simple protocol to routinely assess the uniformity of proteomics analyses. , 2014, Journal of proteome research.

[24]  Johannes Griss,et al.  Recognizing millions of consistently unidentified spectra across hundreds of shotgun proteomics datasets , 2016, Nature Methods.

[25]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Computational and Statistical Analysis of Protein Mass Spectrometry Data , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  E. Verpoorte,et al.  Improvement of recovery and repeatability in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of peptides. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[27]  Matthias Mann,et al.  SprayQc: a real-time LC-MS/MS quality monitoring system to maximize uptime using off the shelf components. , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[28]  G. Omenn,et al.  A first step toward completion of a genome-wide characterization of the human proteome. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[29]  Alfonso Valencia,et al.  The potential clinical impact of the release of two drafts of the human proteome , 2015, Expert review of proteomics.

[30]  Guadalupe Espadas,et al.  Cutting edge proteomics: benchmarking of six commercial trypsins. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[31]  Jun Fan,et al.  A critical appraisal of techniques, software packages, and standards for quantitative proteomic analysis. , 2012, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[32]  Otto Hudecz,et al.  Preventing carryover of peptides and proteins in nano LC-MS separations. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[33]  Henning Hermjakob,et al.  Testing and Validation of Computational Methods for Mass Spectrometry. , 2016, Journal of proteome research.

[34]  R. Pepperkok,et al.  Institutional core facilities: prerequisite for breakthroughs in the life sciences , 2016, EMBO reports.

[35]  José A. Dianes,et al.  2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[36]  Hong Gao,et al.  Universal LC-MS method for minimized carryover in a discovery bioanalytical setting. , 2012, Bioanalysis.

[37]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Interlaboratory studies and initiatives developing standards for proteomics , 2013, Proteomics.

[38]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  HPLC techniques for proteomics analysis--a short overview of latest developments. , 2006, Briefings in functional genomics & proteomics.

[39]  R. Zahedi,et al.  Peptide identification quality control , 2011, Proteomics.

[40]  C. Eyers,et al.  RePLiCal: A QconCAT Protein for Retention Time Standardization in Proteomics Studies. , 2016, Journal of proteome research.

[41]  D. Rose,et al.  DETERMINATION OF CYANATE, AND A STUDY OF ITS ACCUMULATION IN AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS OF UREA. , 1964, Analytical biochemistry.

[42]  Christoph H Borchers,et al.  Design, Implementation and Multisite Evaluation of a System Suitability Protocol for the Quantitative Assessment of Instrument Performance in Liquid Chromatography-Multiple Reaction Monitoring-MS (LC-MRM-MS)* , 2013, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[43]  Lennart Martens,et al.  Computational quality control tools for mass spectrometry proteomics , 2017, Proteomics.

[44]  Johannes Griss,et al.  Spectral library searching in proteomics , 2016, Proteomics.

[45]  Alexey I Nesvizhskii,et al.  Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry , 2007, Nature Methods.

[46]  G. Conn,et al.  Ion chromatographic quantification of cyanate in urea solutions: estimation of the efficiency of cyanate scavengers for use in recombinant protein manufacturing. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[47]  Brian L. LaMarche,et al.  Signatures for Mass Spectrometry Data Quality , 2014, Journal of proteome research.

[48]  Birgit Schilling,et al.  Interlaboratory Study Characterizing a Yeast Performance Standard for Benchmarking LC-MS Platform Performance* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[49]  Albert Sickmann,et al.  Systematic and quantitative comparison of digest efficiency and specificity reveals the impact of trypsin quality on MS-based proteomics. , 2012, Journal of proteomics.

[50]  Cathy H. Wu,et al.  The Human Proteome Project: Current State and Future Direction , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[51]  María Martín,et al.  UniProt: A hub for protein information , 2015 .

[52]  Edward L. Huttlin,et al.  A mass-tolerant database search identifies a large proportion of unassigned spectra in shotgun proteomics as modified peptides , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[53]  Lydie Lane,et al.  Metrics for the Human Proteome Project 2016: Progress on Identifying and Characterizing the Human Proteome, Including Post-Translational Modifications. , 2016, Journal of proteome research.

[54]  Uta Ceglarek,et al.  Sample preparation strategies for targeted proteomics via proteotypic peptides in human blood using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry , 2015, Proteomics. Clinical applications.

[55]  Lennart Martens,et al.  The minimum information about a proteomics experiment (MIAPE) , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[56]  Lukas Käll,et al.  Solution to Statistical Challenges in Proteomics Is More Statistics, Not Less. , 2015, Journal of proteome research.

[57]  Alexey I Nesvizhskii,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of protein digestion using six trypsins reveals the origin of trypsin as a significant source of variability in proteomics. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[58]  Lennart Martens,et al.  Designing biomedical proteomics experiments: state-of-the-art and future perspectives , 2016, Expert review of proteomics.

[59]  Jennifer E Van Eyk,et al.  A Roadmap to Successful Clinical Proteomics. , 2017, Clinical chemistry.

[60]  David L. Tabb,et al.  QC Metrics from CPTAC Raw LC-MS/MS Data Interpreted through Multivariate Statistics , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[61]  E. Boja,et al.  Overalkylation of a protein digest with iodoacetamide. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[62]  Y. Michotte,et al.  Strategies to reduce aspecific adsorption of peptides and proteins in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry based bioanalyses: an overview. , 2014, Journal of chromatography. A.

[63]  B. Searle,et al.  A Face in the Crowd: Recognizing Peptides Through Database Search* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[64]  Zengyou He,et al.  Protein inference: a review , 2012, Briefings Bioinform..

[65]  R. Whittal,et al.  Interferences and contaminants encountered in modern mass spectrometry. , 2008, Analytica chimica acta.

[66]  Christoph H Borchers,et al.  Pre-analytical and analytical variability in absolute quantitative MRM-based plasma proteomic studies. , 2013, Bioanalysis.

[67]  Juan P Albar,et al.  Multicenter experiment for quality control of peptide-centric LC-MS/MS analysis - A longitudinal performance assessment with nLC coupled to orbitrap MS analyzers. , 2015, Journal of proteomics.

[68]  Anna Bierczynska-Krzysik,et al.  Methods for samples preparation in proteomic research. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[69]  Gary D Bader,et al.  A draft map of the human proteome , 2014, Nature.

[70]  Vivian V. H. Hook,et al.  Differential recovery of peptides from sample tubes and the reproducibility of quantitative proteomic data. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[71]  A. Heck,et al.  Six alternative proteases for mass spectrometry–based proteomics beyond trypsin , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[72]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Sources of technical variability in quantitative LC-MS proteomics: human brain tissue sample analysis. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[73]  S. Degroeve,et al.  Asn3, a reliable, robust, and universal lock mass for improved accuracy in LC-MS and LC-MS/MS. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[74]  R. Zahedi,et al.  Protein carbamylation: In vivo modification or in vitro artefact? , 2013, Proteomics.

[75]  Alexey I Nesvizhskii,et al.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[76]  Bernhard Kuster,et al.  Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present , 2012, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[77]  W. Ens,et al.  Deamidation of -Asn-Gly- sequences during sample preparation for proteomics: Consequences for MALDI and HPLC-MALDI analysis. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[78]  B. Kuster,et al.  Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome , 2014, Nature.

[79]  A. Heck,et al.  Proteomics beyond trypsin , 2015, The FEBS journal.

[80]  Tao Xu,et al.  Toward objective evaluation of proteomic algorithms , 2012, Nature Methods.

[81]  Jeffrey R. Whiteaker,et al.  Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer , 2014, Nature.

[82]  Jeffrey S. Morris,et al.  Signal in noise: evaluating reported reproducibility of serum proteomic tests for ovarian cancer. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[83]  L. Reubsaet,et al.  Why less is more when generating tryptic peptides in bottom‐up proteomics , 2014, Proteomics.

[84]  Surinder Kaur,et al.  Recommendations for Validation of LC-MS/MS Bioanalytical Methods for Protein Biotherapeutics , 2014, The AAPS Journal.

[85]  Andreas Stengel,et al.  The importance of using the optimal plasticware and glassware in studies involving peptides. , 2011, Analytical biochemistry.

[86]  Michael S. Bereman,et al.  Implementation of Statistical Process Control for Proteomic Experiments Via LC MS/MS , 2014, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[87]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  An improved method for tracking and reducing the void volume in nano HPLC–MS with micro trapping columns , 2003, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[88]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Quality control in LC‐MS/MS , 2011, Proteomics.

[89]  Christoph H Borchers,et al.  Standardized protocols for quality control of MRM-based plasma proteomic workflows. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[90]  Vicki J. Barwick,et al.  Sources of uncertainty in gas chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography , 1999 .

[91]  Martin Eisenacher,et al.  Quality meets quantity – quality control, data standards and repositories , 2011, Proteomics.

[92]  R. Zubarev The challenge of the proteome dynamic range and its implications for in‐depth proteomics , 2013, Proteomics.

[93]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  The standard protein mix database: a diverse data set to assist in the production of improved Peptide and protein identification software tools. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[94]  Ashley C. Gucinski,et al.  Performance metrics for evaluating system suitability in liquid chromatography—Mass spectrometry peptide mass mapping of protein therapeutics and monoclonal antibodies , 2015, mAbs.

[95]  Michael D. Litton,et al.  IDPicker 2.0: Improved protein assembly with high discrimination peptide identification filtering. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[96]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Proteomic analyses using an accurate mass and time tag strategy. , 2004, BioTechniques.

[97]  Lennart Martens Public proteomics data: How the field has evolved from sceptical inquiry to the promise of in silico proteomics☆ , 2016, EuPA open proteomics.

[98]  J. Reilly,et al.  Artifacts and unassigned masses encountered in peptide mass mapping. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[99]  Piliang Hao,et al.  Detection, Evaluation and Minimization of Nonenzymatic Deamidation in Proteomic Sample Preparation* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[100]  David L. Tabb,et al.  Performance Metrics for Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Systems in Proteomics Analyses* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[101]  Shan He,et al.  MaConDa: a publicly accessible mass spectrometry contaminants database , 2012, Bioinform..

[102]  David L. Tabb,et al.  The 2012/2013 ABRF Proteomic Research Group Study: Assessing Longitudinal Intralaboratory Variability in Routine Peptide Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analyses* , 2015, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[103]  M. Mann Comparative analysis to guide quality improvements in proteomics , 2009, Nature Methods.

[104]  M. Pelzing,et al.  Investigation of carryover of peptides in nano-liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry using packed and monolithic capillary columns. , 2013, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[105]  Jürgen Cox,et al.  A practical guide to the MaxQuant computational platform for SILAC-based quantitative proteomics , 2009, Nature Protocols.

[106]  Martin Eisenacher,et al.  The Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standards Initiative Quality Control Working Group: Making Quality Control More Accessible for Biological Mass Spectrometry. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[107]  G. Stark,et al.  Reactions of the Cyanate Present in Aqueous Urea with Amino Acids and Proteins , 1960 .

[108]  Christoph H Borchers,et al.  Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring–based measurements of proteins in plasma , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[109]  Lennart Martens,et al.  Unsupervised Quality Assessment of Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Experiments by Multivariate Quality Control Metrics. , 2016, Journal of proteome research.

[110]  Jerzy Silberring,et al.  A practical guide to nano-LC troubleshooting. , 2007, Journal of separation science.

[111]  Huali Shen,et al.  Controlling nonspecific trypsin cleavages in LC-MS/MS-based shotgun proteomics using optimized experimental conditions. , 2015, The Analyst.

[112]  H. Bloemendal,et al.  Cyanate formation in solutions of urea. I. Calculation of cyanate concentrations at different temperature and pH. , 1971, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[113]  Nicola C Hughes,et al.  Determination of carryover and contamination for mass spectrometry-based chromatographic assays , 2007, The AAPS Journal.

[114]  D. Duong,et al.  Systematical optimization of reverse-phase chromatography for shotgun proteomics. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[115]  Lennart Martens A report on the ESF workshop on quality control in proteomics. , 2010, Molecular bioSystems.

[116]  Amos Bairoch,et al.  Metrics for the Human Proteome Project 2013-2014 and strategies for finding missing proteins. , 2014, Journal of proteome research.

[117]  S. Hess,et al.  Effect of mass spectrometric parameters on peptide and protein identification rates for shotgun proteomic experiments on an LTQ‐orbitrap mass analyzer , 2012, Proteomics.

[118]  R. Sederoff,et al.  Understanding the role of proteolytic digestion on discovery and targeted proteomic measurements using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and design of experiments. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[119]  John Chilton,et al.  Using iRT, a normalized retention time for more targeted measurement of peptides , 2012, Proteomics.

[120]  M. Baker 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility , 2016, Nature.

[121]  David Fenyö,et al.  Mass spectrometric protein identification using the global proteome machine. , 2010, Methods in molecular biology.

[122]  J. Yates,et al.  Off-Line Multidimensional Liquid Chromatography and Auto Sampling Result in Sample Loss in LC/LC–MS/MS , 2014, Journal of proteome research.

[123]  David L. Tabb,et al.  Proteomic analysis of colon and rectal carcinoma using standard and customized databases , 2015, Scientific Data.

[124]  K. Medzihradszky,et al.  Lessons in de novo peptide sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. , 2015, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[125]  Angus I. Lamond,et al.  Cleaning up the masses: Exclusion lists to reduce contamination with HPLC-MS/MS , 2013, Journal of proteomics.

[126]  Michael J. Sweredoski,et al.  Evaluation and optimization of mass spectrometric settings during data-dependent acquisition mode: focus on LTQ-Orbitrap mass analyzers. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[127]  R. Beavis,et al.  Using annotated peptide mass spectrum libraries for protein identification. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[128]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Selected reaction monitoring–based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions , 2012, Nature Methods.

[129]  Kelvin H Lee,et al.  Kinetic characterization of sequencing grade modified trypsin , 2005, Proteomics.

[130]  Christoph H Borchers,et al.  Method and platform standardization in MRM-based quantitative plasma proteomics. , 2013, Journal of proteomics.

[131]  David L. Tabb,et al.  Reproducibility of Differential Proteomic Technologies in CPTAC Fractionated Xenografts , 2015, Journal of proteome research.

[132]  B. Domon,et al.  A quality control of proteomic experiments based on multiple isotopologous internal standards , 2015 .

[133]  R. Dean,et al.  Improving Proteome Coverage on a LTQ-Orbitrap Using Design of Experiments , 2011, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[134]  V. Spicer,et al.  Application of modern reversed-phase peptide retention prediction algorithms to the Houghten and DeGraw dataset: peptide helicity and its effect on prediction accuracy. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. A.

[135]  Yasset Perez-Riverol,et al.  A multi-center study benchmarks software tools for label-free proteome quantification , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[136]  Subha Madhavan,et al.  The CPTAC Data Portal: A Resource for Cancer Proteomics Research. , 2015, Journal of proteome research.

[137]  G. Stark Reactions of cyanate with functional groups of proteins. 3. Reactions with amino and carboxyl groups. , 1965, Biochemistry.

[138]  Laurent Gatto,et al.  Challenges for proteomics core facilities , 2011, Proteomics.

[139]  Robert E. Kearney,et al.  A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2009, Nature Methods.

[140]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Large-scale quantitative assessment of different in-solution protein digestion protocols reveals superior cleavage efficiency of tandem Lys-C/trypsin proteolysis over trypsin digestion. , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[141]  Birgit Schilling,et al.  Repeatability and reproducibility in proteomic identifications by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[142]  K. Stejskal,et al.  Suppression of peptide sample losses in autosampler vials. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[143]  David L Tabb,et al.  Quality assessment for clinical proteomics. , 2013, Clinical biochemistry.