Examining the Benefits and Prevalence of Modality Considerations in Special Education

Questions related to the validity, efficacy, and prevalence of the psychoeducational practice of modifying instruction in accord with children's relative modality strengths are examined in a research review and in a survey of practicing special education teachers. Despite attempts to assess relative modality strength using 32 separate tests, subtests, or combinations thereof in conjunction with a variety of instructional interventions, no one has successfully demonstrated that beginning reading instruction can be improved by modality and instructional matching. In spite of the absence of evidence that supports modality instructional matching, textbooks urge teachers to adopt this approach, and the majority of special education teachers believe in and employ this model. Implications of these findings are discuseed both for teacher training programs and for instructional practice.

[1]  Relationship Between Modality Preference and Performance , 1973 .

[2]  R. Bruininks.  Relationship of Auditory and Visual Perceptual Strengths to Methods of Teaching Word Recognition Among Disadvantaged Negro Boys. , 1968 .

[3]  Joseph R. Jenkins,et al.  Standardized Achievement Tests: How Useful for Special Education? , 1978 .

[4]  W. Barbe,et al.  Educating children with learning disabilities : selected readings , 1967 .

[5]  Modality Aptitude and Word Recognition* , 1974 .

[6]  D. Sabatino,et al.  Diagnostic-prescriptive perceptual training with mentally retarded children. , 1973, American journal of mental deficiency.

[7]  P. Newcomer,et al.  Effect of Modality of Instruction on the Learning of Meaningful and Nonmeaningful Material by Auditory and Visual Learners , 1975 .

[8]  Robert A. Mccracken.  A TWO-YEAR LONGITUDINAL STUDY TO DETERMINE THE ABILITY OF FIRST GRADE CHILDREN TO LEARN TO READ USING THE EARLY-TO-READ I/T/A PROGRAM. , 1967 .

[9]  L. H. Ringler,et al.  Learning Modality and Word Recognition of First Grade Children , 1973 .

[10]  D. Hammill,et al.  The Relationship of Selected Auditory Perceptual Skills and Reading Ability , 1974 .

[11]  J. Wishart.  Tables for Statisticians , 1939, Nature.

[12]  Lawrence T. Mello.  Project CAM: Reaching Objectives Through Learning Modalities. , 1971 .

[13]  M. Charlton.  Predicting Reading Failure. , 1967 .

[14]  N. Dorfman,et al.  Matching Learner Aptitude to Two Commercial Reading Programs , 1974 .

[15]  Carolyn M. Smith.  The Relationship of Reading Method and Reading Achievement to ITPA Sensory Modalities , 1971 .

[16]  H. Robinson.  Visual and Auditory Modalities Related to Methods for Beginning Reading. , 1972 .

[17]  M. Lilly,et al.  Modality Strengths and Aptitude-Treatment Interaction , 1973 .

[18]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Resource Teacher Program , 1976, Exceptional children.

[19]  S. A. Kirk,et al.  The Illinois test of psycholinguistic abilities--an approach to differential diagnosis. , 1961, American journal of mental deficiency.