Synchronization of ventricular fibrillation with electrical pacing guided by optical signals: comparison of pacing locations

Wavefront synchronization is an important aspect preceding the termination of ventricular fibrillation (VF). We designed a novel approach using multi-electrode pacing that could reduce the energy consumption of successful defibrillation by more than 100-fold. We compared the efficacy of a synchronized pacing algorithm using optical recording-guided pacing at the right ventricle and the posterior left ventricle in isolated rabbit hearts. Two modes of pacing were used in the study. The electrodes were individually controlled (independent mode, ISyncP) or fired together (simultaneous mode, SSyncP) when triggered by tissue polarization at a reference site separate from the pacing sites. The hearts were stained with voltage-sensitive dye and illuminated with laser for epifluorescence imaging during pacing. The number of phase singularities of VF propagation was used to estimate the complexity of VF. A decrease in the number of PS signified a higher degree of VF organization. We found that the pacing algorithm was more effective if the pacing was applied to the posterior left ventricle than to the right ventricle. Pacing in the posterior left ventricle resulted in a 25.3% decrease in the number of PS for ISyncP and a 31% decrease for SSyncP. Pacing in the right ventricle resulted in a 29.0% decrease for ISyncP and a 2.3% increase for SSyncP. The 5mA current reflected a 27.8% decrease for ISyncP and a 32.2% decrease for SSyncP, whereas the 10mA current reflected a 27.2% decrease for ISyncP and a 5.2% increase for SSyncP. We conclude that synchronized pacing can induce VF organization, and the efficacy is higher when pacing in the left ventricle with 5 mA.

[1]  Shien-Fong Lin,et al.  Spatiotemporal Correlation Between Phase Singularities and Wavebreaks During Ventricular Fibrillation , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[2]  Hui-Nam Pak,et al.  Synchronization of ventricular fibrillation with real-time feedback pacing: implication to low-energy defibrillation. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[3]  Robert A Malkin,et al.  Large Sample Test of Defibrillation Waveform Sensitivity , 2002, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[4]  Shien-Fong Lin,et al.  Spatial Distribution of Phase Singularities in Ventricular Fibrillation , 2003, Circulation.

[5]  R. Gray,et al.  Spatial and temporal organization during cardiac fibrillation , 1998, Nature.

[6]  R. Ideker,et al.  Critically Timed Auxiliary Shock to Weak Field Area Lowers Defibrillation Threshold , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[7]  M. Gold,et al.  Effect of Waveform Tilt on Defibrillation Thresholds in Humans , 1997, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[8]  I R Efimov,et al.  Virtual electrode-induced phase singularity: a basic mechanism of defibrillation failure. , 1998, Circulation research.

[9]  EckartFleck,et al.  Transvenous Biventricular Defibrillation Halves Energy Requirements in Patients , 2001 .

[10]  A Garfinkel,et al.  Patterns of wave break during ventricular fibrillation in isolated swine right ventricle. , 2001, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[11]  H. Pak,et al.  Improvement of Defibrillation Efficacy with Preshock Synchronized Pacing , 2004, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[12]  Jonathan C. Newton,et al.  Pacing During Ventricular Fibrillation: Factors Influencing the Ability to Capture , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[13]  B. Roth,et al.  Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of Phase Singularity Dynamics in Cardiac Tissue , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[14]  O. Tovar,et al.  Can shocks timed to action potentials in low-gradient regions improve both internal and out-of-hospital defibrillation? , 1998, Journal of electrocardiology.