Factors to keep in mind when introducing virtual microscopy

Digitization of glass slides and delivery of so-called virtual slides (VS) emulating a real microscope over the Internet have become reality due to recent improvements in technology. We have implemented a virtual microscope for instruction of medical students and for continuing medical education. Up to 30,000 images per slide are captured using a microscope with an automated stage. The images are post-processed and then served by a plain hypertext transfer protocol (http)-server. A virtual slide client (vMic) based on Macromedia's Flash MX, a highly accepted technology available on every modern Web browser, has been developed. All necessary virtual slide parameters are stored in an XML file together with the image. Evaluation of the courses by questionnaire indicated that most students and many but not all pathologists regard virtual slides as an adequate replacement for traditional slides. All our virtual slides are publicly accessible over the World Wide Web (WWW) at http://vmic.unibas.ch. Recently, several commercially available virtual slide acquisition systems (VSAS) have been developed that use various technologies to acquire and distribute virtual slides. These systems differ in speed, image quality, compatibility, viewer functionalities and price. This paper gives an overview of the factors to keep in mind when introducing virtual microscopy.

[1]  Mikael Lundin,et al.  Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardizing Gleason grading. , 2005, Human pathology.

[2]  David J Romer,et al.  Use of virtual microscopy for didactic live-audience presentation in anatomic pathology. , 2003, Annals of diagnostic pathology.

[3]  David J Romer,et al.  Using a modified standard microscope to generate virtual slides. , 2003, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[4]  P Schwarzmann,et al.  Clinical trial of telepathology as an alternative modality in breast histopathology quality assurance. , 2000, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[5]  Katharina Glatz-Krieger,et al.  Virtual slides: high-quality demand, physical limitations, and affordability. , 2003, Human pathology.

[6]  F. Zito,et al.  Quicktime virtual reality technology in light microscopy to support medical education in pathology , 2004, Modern Pathology.

[7]  Charles A Blake,et al.  Teaching medical histology at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine: Transition to virtual slides and virtual microscopes. , 2003, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[8]  A M Marchevsky,et al.  "Virtual microscopy" and the internet as telepathology consultation tools: diagnostic accuracy in evaluating melanocytic skin lesions. , 1999, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[9]  Joel H. Saltz,et al.  The virtual microscope. , 2003, IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  R S Weinstein,et al.  Telepathology overview: from concept to implementation. , 2001, Human pathology.

[11]  Syed Z. Ali,et al.  Application of virtual microscopy in clinical cytopathology , 2001, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[12]  Stefano Forti,et al.  Digital Storage of Glass Slides for Quality Assurance in Histopathology and Cytopathology , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[13]  Alberto M Marchevsky,et al.  Virtual microscopy as a tool for proficiency testing in cytopathology: a model using multiple digital images of Papanicolaou tests. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[14]  Anju Relan,et al.  Self-instructional "virtual pathology" laboratories using web-based technology enhance medical school teaching of pathology. , 2003, Human pathology.

[15]  Fred R. Dee,et al.  Implementation of virtual microscope slides in the annual pathobiology of cancer workshop laboratory. , 2003, Human pathology.

[16]  John R Davis,et al.  An array microscope for ultrarapid virtual slide processing and telepathology. Design, fabrication, and validation study. , 2004, Human pathology.

[17]  F. Demichelis,et al.  The virtual case: a new method to completely digitize cytological and histological slides , 2002, Virchows Archiv.

[18]  B. Molnár,et al.  Digital slide and virtual microscopy based routine and telepathology evaluation of routine gastrointestinal biopsy specimens , 2003, Journal of clinical pathology.

[19]  F. J. W-M Automated complete slide digitization: a medium for simultaneous viewing by multiple pathologists , 2001 .

[20]  Joel H. Saltz,et al.  Digital dynamic telepathology-the Virtual Microscope , 1998, AMIA.

[21]  James H Harrison,et al.  Training in pathology informatics: implementation at the University of Pittsburgh. , 2003, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[22]  Fred R. Dee,et al.  Virtual microscopy for learning and assessment in pathology , 2004, The Journal of pathology.

[23]  T Harris,et al.  Comparison of a virtual microscope laboratory to a regular microscope laboratory for teaching histology , 2001, The Anatomical record.

[24]  J. Giltnane,et al.  Technology Insight: identification of biomarkers with tissue microarray technology , 2004, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[25]  Walter H Henricks,et al.  Informatics training in pathology residency programs: proposed learning objectives and skill sets for the new millennium. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[26]  Sean SP Costello,et al.  Development and Evaluation of the Virtual Pathology Slide: A New Tool in Telepathology , 2003, Journal of medical Internet research.

[27]  James Duncan,et al.  Integrated approach to teaching and testing in histology with real and virtual imaging , 2002, The Anatomical record.