Modeling the effects of crew size and crew fatigue on the control of tactical unmanned aerial vehicles (TUAVs)

The field element of the US Army Research Lab (ARL) at Fort Huachuca, Arizona is concerned with the manning required to operate the close-range Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (TUAV). The operational requirements of the TUAV operators may include extended duty days, reduced crew size and varying shift schedules. These conditions are likely to reduce operator effectiveness due to fatigue. The objective of the study was to analyze how fatigue, crew size, and rotation schedule affect operator workload and performance during the control of a TUAV. The conclusions from executing the models indicate that reducing the number of operators currently recommended for the control of TUAVs results in: 1) 33% more aerial vehicle (AV) mishaps during emergencies, 2) a 13% increase in the time it takes to search for targets, and 3) an 11% decrease in the number of targets detected. Over 400 mission scenario replications of the model were executed allowing statistically reliable predictions to be made of the effect of operator fatigue on performance. Discrete event simulation (DES) models may provide a cost effective means to estimate the impact of human limitations on military systems and highlight performance areas needing attention.

[1]  D. Dawson,et al.  Fatigue, alcohol and performance impairment , 1997, Nature.

[2]  Paul Naitoh,et al.  Circadian rhythms determined by cosine curve fitting: Analysis of continuous work and sleep-loss data , 1985 .

[3]  Michael A. Vidulich,et al.  Computer Modeling of Operator Mental Workload and Situational Awareness in Simulated Air-to-Ground Combat: An Assessment of Predictive Validity , 1998 .

[4]  Robert Sutton,et al.  Applications of Human Performance Models to System Design , 1989, Springer US.

[5]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[6]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[7]  Michael J. Barnes,et al.  Crew Systems Analysis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Future Job and Tasking Environments , 2000 .

[8]  M. T. Lawless,et al.  Using micro saint to predict performance in a nuclear power plant control room , 1995 .

[9]  J H McCracken,et al.  Analyses of Selected LHX Mission Functions: Implications for Operator Workload and System Automation Goals , 1984 .

[10]  Theodore B. Aldrich,et al.  The Development and Application of Models to Predict Operator Workload During System Design , 1989 .

[11]  Richard W Pew,et al.  Representing Human Behavior in Military Simulations : Interim Report , 1997 .

[12]  Robert G. Angus,et al.  Effects of sleep loss on sustained cognitive performance during a command and control simulation , 1985 .

[13]  T A Benline,et al.  Anti-emetic drug effects on cognitive and psychomotor performance: granisetron vs. ondansetron. , 1997, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.