Evaluating morphological variability in lithic assemblages using 3D models of stone artifacts

Abstract Technological and morphological variability in lithic artifacts is commonly used to identify taxonomic entities in Paleolithic research contexts. Assemblages are mainly studied using either linear distance measurements or qualitative assessments of morphologies. Here, we present a method to quantify morphological variability in lithic artifacts using 3D models of stone artifacts. Our study on the sequence of the Upper Paleolithic layers V–I from the site Yabroud II in western Syria, demonstrates that utilizing 3D models provides a new insight into the variability of lithic technologies. We use quantitative data on convexities, twist and scar patterns on cores and blades, attributes previously not readily quantifiable, to trace technological change through the archaeological sequence. We are able to identify differences and translate these findings into a grouping of the layers. While layers VI–II are characterized by technological continuity and were grouped together, layers V and I can be separated from this group and represent technologically different groups chronologically before and after. Our results demonstrate the potential of 3D models for studying morphological variability in lithic assemblages.

[1]  W. Wirth,et al.  More than meets the eye , 2007 .

[2]  Matthew Douglass,et al.  The application of 3D laser scanning technology to the assessment of ordinal and mechanical cortex quantification in lithic analysis , 2010 .

[3]  Harold L. Dibble,et al.  The relative effects of core surface morphology on flake shape and other attributes , 2011 .

[4]  J. Speth.  The Role of Platform Angle and Core Size in Hard-Hammer Percussion Flaking , 1981 .

[5]  Peter Hiscock,et al.  Estimating original flake mass from 3D scans of platform area , 2011 .

[6]  Paul Goldberg,et al.  The early Upper Paleolithic occupations at Uçağizli Cave (Hatay, Turkey). , 2009, Journal of human evolution.

[7]  S. Ploux,et al.  Umm el Tlel, une séquence du Paléolithique supérieur en Syrie centrale. Industries lithiques et chronologie culturelle , 2003 .

[8]  A. Belfer‐Cohen,et al.  Why Microliths? Microlithization in the Levant , 2008 .

[9]  Tim Gernat,et al.  Virtual skeletons: using a structured light scanner to create a 3D faunal comparative collection , 2009 .

[10]  Tim Gernat,et al.  Structured light scanning for high-resolution documentation of in situ archaeological finds , 2009 .

[11]  Gerd-Christian Weniger,et al.  The Middle – Upper Palaeolithic Transition at Yabroud II (Syria). A Re-evaluation of the Lithic Material from the Rust Excavation , 2008 .

[12]  George Pavlidis,et al.  Qp: A tool for generating 3D models of ancient Greek pottery , 2009 .

[13]  Stephen J. Lycett,et al.  Why Levallois? A Morphometric Comparison of Experimental ‘Preferential’ Levallois Flakes versus Debitage Flakes , 2012, PloS one.

[14]  Michael Shott,et al.  Exploring New Approaches to Lithic Analysis: Laser Scanning and Geometric Morphometrics , 2010 .

[15]  J. Speth.  Mechanical Basis of Percussion Flaking , 1972, American Antiquity.

[16]  Don E. Crabtree,et al.  The Corbiac blade technique and other experiments , 1969 .

[17]  Alfred Rust.  Die Höhlenfunde von Jabrud (Syrien) , 1950 .

[18]  H. Dibble,et al.  The Effect of Hammer Mass and Velocity on Flake Mass , 1995 .

[19]  Stephen J. Lycett,et al.  A comparative 3D geometric morphometric analysis of Victoria West cores: implications for the origins of Levallois technology , 2010 .

[20]  William Andrefsky,et al.  A Consideration of Blade and Flake Curvature , 1986 .

[21]  N. Conard,et al.  Water availability and landuse during the Upper and Epipaleolithic in southwestern Syria , 2012 .

[22]  C. Bergman,et al.  A technological and typological analysis of the transitional and early upper Paleolithic levels of Ksar Akil and Abu Halka : level XXV-XII , 1986 .

[23]  M. Baxter,et al.  Beyond the histogram. Improved approaches to simple data display in archaeology using kernel density estimates , 1996 .

[24]  H. Dibble,et al.  New experimental evidence on the relation between percussion flaking and flake variation , 1981 .

[25]  Richard Wright,et al.  Some Archaeological Applications of Kernel Density Estimates , 1997 .

[26]  Chris Clarkson,et al.  Quantifying flake scar patterning on cores using 3D recording techniques , 2006 .

[27]  Harold L. Dibble,et al.  Introducing a new experimental design for controlled studies of flake formation: results for exterior platform angle, platform depth, angle of blow, velocity, and force , 2009 .

[28]  Uzy Smilansky,et al.  On the application of 3-D scanning technology for the documentation and typology of lithic artifacts , 2008 .

[29]  John K. Williams,et al.  Upper Paleolithic Levels XIII-VI (A and B) from the 1937-1938 and 1947-1948 Boston College Excavations and the Levantine Aurignacian at Ksar Akil, Lebanon , 2010 .

[30]  John D. Speth,et al.  Miscellaneous Studies in Hard-Hammer Percussion Flaking: The Effects of Oblique Impact , 1975, American Antiquity.

[31]  G. Tostevin.  Levels of Theory and Social Practice in the Reduction Sequence and Chaîne Opératoire Methods of Lithic Analysis , 2011 .

[32]  I. Gilead.  The Upper Paleolithic period in the Levant , 1991 .

[33]  Nigel Turner,et al.  Differing Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response to Excess Lipogenesis versus Lipid Oversupply in Relation to Hepatic Steatosis and Insulin Resistance , 2012, PloS one.