Immunoarchitectural characterization of a human skin model reconstructed in vitro.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE Over the last few years, different models for human skin equivalent reconstructed in vitro (HSERIV) have been reported for clinical usage and applications in research for the pharmaceutical industry. Before release for routine use as human skin replacements, HSERIV models need to be tested regarding their similarity with in vivo skin, using morphological (architectural) and immunohistochemical (functional) analyses. A model for HSERIV has been developed in our hospital, and our aim here was to further characterize its immunoarchitectural features by comparing them with human skin, before it can be tested for clinical use, e.g. for severe burns or wounds, whenever ancillary methods are not indicated. DESIGN AND SETTING Experimental laboratory study, in the Skin Cell Culture Laboratory, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas. METHODS Histological sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin, Masson's trichrome for collagen fibers, periodic acid-Schiff reagent for basement membrane and glycogen, Weigert-Van Gieson for elastic fibers and Fontana-Masson for melanocytes. Immunohistochemistry was used to localize cytokeratins (broad spectrum of molecular weight, AE1/AE3), high molecular weight cytokeratins (34betaE12), low molecular weight cytokeratins (35betaH11), cytokeratins 7 and 20, vimentin, S-100 protein (for melanocytic and dendritic cells), CD68 (KP1, histiocytes) and CD34 (QBend, endothelium). RESULTS Histology revealed satisfactory similarity between HSERIV and in vivo skin. Immunohistochemical analysis on HSERIV demonstrated that the marker pattern was similar to what is generally present in human skin in vivo. CONCLUSION HSERIV is morphologically and functionally compatible with human skin observed in vivo.

[1]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  The catalog of human cytokeratins: Patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells , 1982, Cell.

[2]  Classification of epidermal keratins according to their immunoreactivity, isoelectric point, and mode of expression , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  K. Holbrook,et al.  Developmental expression of human epidermal keratins and filaggrin. , 1987, Current Topics in Developmental Biology.

[4]  Holbrook Ka,et al.  Developmental expression of human epidermal keratins and filaggrin. , 1987 .

[5]  D Asselineau,et al.  Human epidermis reconstructed on dermal substrates in vitro: an alternative to animals in skin pharmacology. , 1990, Skin pharmacology : the official journal of the Skin Pharmacology Society.

[6]  S. Weiss,et al.  Evaluation of CD68 and Other Histiocytic Antigens in Angiomatoid Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma , 1991, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[7]  B. Nickoloff.  The human progenitor cell antigen (CD34) is localized on endothelial cells, dermal dendritic cells, and perifollicular cells in formalin-fixed normal skin, and on proliferating endothelial cells and stromal spindle-shaped cells in Kaposi's sarcoma. , 1991, Archives of dermatology.

[8]  M. Ponec,et al.  In vitro cultured human skin cells as alternatives to animals for skin irritancy screening , 1992, International journal of cosmetic science.

[9]  A. Taïeb,et al.  Use of human skin reconstructs in the study of pigment modifiers. , 1997, Archives of dermatology.

[10]  C. Heizmann,et al.  Immunohistochemical localization of the Ca2+ binding S100 proteins in normal human skin and melanocytic lesions , 1997, The British journal of dermatology.

[11]  A. Poniecka,et al.  An immunohistochemical study of basal cell carcinoma and trichoepithelioma. , 1999, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[12]  Y. Ikada,et al.  Cellular artificial skin substitute produced by short period simultaneous culture of fibroblasts and keratinocytes. , 1999, British journal of plastic surgery.

[13]  M Kremer,et al.  Evaluation of dermal-epidermal skin equivalents ('composite-skin') of human keratinocytes in a collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrix(Integra artificial skin). , 2000, British journal of plastic surgery.

[14]  U A Stock,et al.  Tissue engineering: current state and prospects. , 2001, Annual review of medicine.

[15]  M. Mommaas,et al.  Barrier Function in Reconstructed Epidermis and Its Resemblance to Native Human Skin , 2001, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[16]  B. Huppertz,et al.  An improved and rapid method to construct skin equivalents from human hair follicles and fibroblasts , 2001, Experimental dermatology.

[17]  G. Kratz,et al.  A biodegradable bovine collagen membrane as a dermal template for human in vivo wound healing. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[18]  N. Dean,et al.  Immunohistochemical Labeling of Normal Melanocytes , 2002, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[19]  P. Chu,et al.  Keratin expression in human tissues and neoplasms , 2002, Histopathology.

[20]  Susan Gibbs,et al.  Characterization of Reconstructed Skin Models , 2002, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[21]  N. Moiemen,et al.  Reepithelialization of a full-thickness burn from stem cells of hair follicles micrografted into a tissue-engineered dermal template (Integra). , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[22]  M. Ponec,et al.  Basement membrane reconstruction in human skin equivalents is regulated by fibroblasts and/or exogenously activated keratinocytes. , 2005, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[23]  M. Yaar,et al.  Keratin 16 Expression in Epidermal Melanocytes of Normal Human Skin , 2005, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[24]  U. Mirastschijski,et al.  Epithelial regeneration from bioengineered skin explants in culture , 2006, The British journal of dermatology.

[25]  Maria Letícia Cintra,et al.  Model for human skin reconstructed in vitro composed of associated dermis and epidermis. , 2006, Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina.