Dicing with death: predator inspection behaviour in minnow shoals

When shoaling minnows encounter a stalking pike, fish leave the shoal, approach the potential predator and then usually halt briefly before returning to the group. This behaviour, termed predator inspection, has been reported from encounters with both real and model pike. A description of inspection behaviour is given using data from experiments with a model pike made to approach foraging minnows with a standardised stalk. Evidence is presented that inspecting fish assess the risks involved. Individual minnows which have carried out an inspection visit to the predator model exhibit changes in behaviour on return which are contingent upon the state of the model, demonstrating that information is gained. Other fish change their behaviour after an inspector returns to the group, suggesting that information about the threat is transferred among the shoal. Possible costs of predator inspection behaviour may balance these benefits of knowledge, but require further investigation.

[1]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Field Trials of Fish Marking using a Jet Inoculator , 1969 .

[2]  The Function of Mammalian Alarm Advertising: Social Signals of Pursuit Invitation? , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[3]  F. Huntingford,et al.  Predation risk and inter-population variation in antipredator behaviour in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  W. Dominey,et al.  Mobbing in colonially nesting fishes, especially the bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus , 1983 .

[5]  The biological function of gulls' attraction towards predators , 1976, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  T. Pitcher Functions of Shoaling Behaviour in Teleosts , 1986 .

[7]  N. Smythe On the Existence of "Pursuit Invitation" Signals in Mammals , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[8]  Anne E. Magurran,et al.  Predator model recognition and response habituation in shoaling minnows , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  R. Hinde Factors governing the changes in strength of a partially inborn response, as shown by the mobbing behaviour of the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs) - I. The nature of the response, and an examination of its course , 1954, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[10]  John R. Krebs,et al.  The Evolution of Alarm Calls: Altruism or Manipulation? , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Felicity A. Huntingford,et al.  Some ethical issues raised by studies of predation and aggression , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  P. Motta Response by potential prey to coral reef fish predators , 1983, Animal Behaviour.