A finite-difference, time-domain solution for three-dimensional electromagnetic modeling

We have developed a finite-difference solution for three-dimensional (3-D) transient electromagnetic problems. The solution steps Maxwell's equations in time using a staggered-grid technique. The time-stepping uses a modified version of the Du Fort-Frankel method which is explicit and always stable. Both conductivity and magnetic permeability can be functions of space, and the model geometry can be arbitrarily complicated. The solution provides both electric and magnetic field responses throughout the earth. Because it solves the coupled, first-order Maxwell's equations, the solution avoids approximating spatial derivatives of physical properties, and thus overcomes many related numerical difficulties. Moreover, since the divergence-free condition for the magnetic field is incorporated explicitly, the solution provides accurate results for the magnetic field at late times.An inhomogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition is imposed at the surface of the earth, while a homogeneous Dirichlet condition is employed along the subsurface boundaries. Numerical dispersion is alleviated by using an adaptive algorithm that uses a fourth-order difference method at early times and a second-order method at other times. Numerical checks against analytical, integral-equation, and spectral differential-difference solutions show that the solution provides accurate results.Execution time for a typical model is about 3.5 hours on an IBM 3090/600S computer for computing the field to 10 ms. That model contains 100 X 100 X 50 grid points representing about three million unknowns and possesses one vertical plane of symmetry, with the smallest grid spacing at 10 m and the highest resistivity at 100 Omega . m. The execution time indicates that the solution is computer intensive, but it is valuable in providing much-needed insight about TEM responses in complicated 3-D situations.

[1]  S. Frankel,et al.  Stability conditions in the numerical treatment of parabolic differential equations , 1953 .

[2]  S. K. Runcorn,et al.  Interpretation theory in applied geophysics , 1965 .

[3]  K. Yee Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell's equations in isotropic media , 1966 .

[4]  G. M. Birtwistle The explicit solution of the equation of heat conduction , 1968, Comput. J..

[5]  Misac N. Nabighian,et al.  The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section; its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation , 1972 .

[6]  R. M. Alford,et al.  ACCURACY OF FINITE‐DIFFERENCE MODELING OF THE ACOUSTIC WAVE EQUATION , 1974 .

[7]  A. Taflove,et al.  Numerical Solution of Steady-State Electromagnetic Scattering Problems Using the Time-Dependent Maxwell's Equations , 1975 .

[8]  K. R. Kelly,et al.  SYNTHETIC SEISMOGRAMS: A FINITE ‐DIFFERENCE APPROACH , 1976 .

[9]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Application of the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method to Sinusoidal Steady-State Electromagnetic-Penetration Problems , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[10]  A. R. Mitchell,et al.  The Finite Difference Method in Partial Differential Equations , 1980 .

[11]  K. Kunz,et al.  Finite-Difference Analysis of EMP Coupling to Lossy Dielectric Structures , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[12]  G. Hoversten,et al.  Transient fields of a current loop source above a layered earth , 1982 .

[13]  C. H. Stoyer,et al.  Finite-difference calculations of the transient field of an axially symmetric Earth for vertical magnetic dipole excitation , 1983 .

[14]  Gerald W. Hohmann,et al.  Diffusion of electromagnetic fields into a two-dimensional earth; a finite-difference approach , 1984 .

[15]  Jean Virieux,et al.  SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method , 1984 .

[16]  Gerald W. Hohmann,et al.  Two-dimensional transient electromagnetic responses , 1985 .

[17]  Numerical modeling of the electromagnetic response of three-dimensional conductors in a layered earth , 1985 .

[18]  Gerald W. Hohmann,et al.  Integral equation solution for the transient electromagnetic response of a three-dimensional body in a conductive half-space , 1985 .

[19]  J. Virieux P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity‐stress finite‐difference method , 1986 .

[20]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Transient electromagnetic response of a three-dimensional body in a layered earth , 1986 .

[21]  I. Stakgold,et al.  Boundary value problems of mathematical physics , 1987 .

[22]  G. W. Hohmann,et al.  4. Electromagnetic Theory for Geophysical Applications , 1987 .

[23]  W Hohmann Gerald,et al.  Numerical modeling for electromagnetic methods of geophysics , 1987 .

[24]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Transient electromagnetic responses of high-contrast prisms in a layered earth , 1988 .

[25]  B. R. Spies,et al.  Petroleum exploration using controlled-source electromagnetic methods , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[26]  Jopie I. Adhidjaja,et al.  A finite-difference algorithm for the transient electromagnetic response of a three-dimensional body , 1989 .

[27]  P. B. Visscher Discrete formulation of Maxwell equations , 1989 .

[28]  R. L. Mackie,et al.  Three-dimensional magnetotelluric modelling and inversion , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[29]  Weng Cho Chew,et al.  Modeling Of The Subsurface Interface Radar , 1990, 10th Annual International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[30]  Irshad R. Mufti,et al.  Large‐scale three‐dimensional seismic models and their interpretive significance , 1990 .

[31]  W. Chew Waves and Fields in Inhomogeneous Media , 1990 .

[32]  Roy J. Greenfield,et al.  Electromagnetic wave propagation in disrupted coal seams , 1991 .

[33]  K. Yee,et al.  A subgridding method for the time-domain finite-difference method to solve Maxwell's equations , 1991 .

[34]  Weng Cho Chew,et al.  Modeling of the subsurface interface radar , 1991 .