Development and Preliminary Validation of the KOOS-ACL: A Short Form Version of the KOOS for Young Active Patients With ACL Tears

Background: The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) is a widely used region-specific outcome measure for assessing patients of all ages with a variety of knee conditions. Use of the KOOS for young active patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear has been called into question regarding its relevance and interpretability for this specific population. Furthermore, the KOOS does not have adequate structural validity for use in high-functioning patients with ACL deficiency. Purpose: To develop a condition-specific short form version of the KOOS that is appropriate for the young active population with ACL deficiency: the KOOS-ACL. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A baseline data set of 618 young patients (≤25 years old) with ACL tears was divided into development and validation samples. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted in the development sample to identify the underlying factor structure and to reduce the number of items based on statistical and conceptual indicators. Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to check fit indices of the proposed KOOS-ACL model in both samples. Psychometric properties of the KOOS-ACL were assessed using the same data set, expanded to include patient data from 5 time points (baseline and postoperative 3, 6, 12, and 24 months). Internal consistency reliability, structural validity, convergent validity, responsiveness to change, floor/ceiling effects, and detection of treatment effects between surgical interventions (ACL reconstruction alone vs ACL reconstruction + lateral extra-articular tenodesis) were assessed. Results: A 2-factor structure was deemed most appropriate for the KOOS-ACL. Of 42 items, 30 were removed from the full-length KOOS. The final KOOS-ACL model showed acceptable internal consistency reliability (α = .79-.90), structural validity (comparative fit index and Tucker-Lewis index = 0.98-0.99; root mean square error of approximation and standardized root mean square residual = 0.04-0.07), convergent validity (Spearman correlation with International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form = 0.61-0.83), and responsiveness across time (significant small to large effects; P < .05). Conclusion: The new KOOS-ACL questionnaire contains 12 items and 2 subscales—Function (8 items) and Sport (4 items)—relevant to young active patients with an ACL tear. Use of this short form would reduce patient burden by more than two-thirds; it provides improved structural validity as compared with the full-length KOOS for our population of interest; and it demonstrates adequate psychometric properties in our sample of young active patients undergoing ACL reconstruction.

[1]  K. Samuelsson,et al.  The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score: shortcomings in evaluating knee function in persons undergoing ACL reconstruction , 2022, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[2]  D. Bryant,et al.  The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Does Not Have Adequate Structural Validity for Use With Young, Active Patients With ACL Tears , 2022, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  J. Brodersen,et al.  Four of five frequently used orthopedic PROMs possess inadequate content validity: a COSMIN evaluation of the mHHS, HAGOS, IKDC-SKF, KOOS and KNEES-ACL , 2021, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[4]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL injury clinical outcomes consensus group , 2020, Journal of ISAKOS.

[5]  Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score , 2020, Definitions.

[6]  N. Simunovic,et al.  Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Reduces Failure of Hamstring Tendon Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 2-Year Outcomes From the STABILITY Study Randomized Clinical Trial , 2020, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  D. Bryant,et al.  The Stability study: a protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in individuals who are at high risk of graft failure , 2019, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[8]  R. Marx,et al.  Development of the KOOSglobal Platform to Measure Patient-Reported Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2018, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  C. Terwee,et al.  Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. , 2016, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[10]  P. Franklin,et al.  Validation of the KOOS, JR: A Short-form Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Survey , 2016, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  C. Terwee,et al.  Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score or International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form: which questionnaire is most useful to monitor patients with an anterior cruciate ligament rupture in the short term? , 2013, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[12]  M. Mukaka,et al.  Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. , 2012, Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi.

[13]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[14]  M. Tavakol,et al.  Making sense of Cronbach's alpha , 2011, International journal of medical education.

[15]  M. Salavati,et al.  Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS); reliability and validity in competitive athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2011, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[16]  C. Terwee,et al.  The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  M. Dougados,et al.  The development of a short measure of physical function for knee OA KOOS-Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS) - an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[18]  E. Roos,et al.  The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[19]  C. Ekdahl,et al.  Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) ‐ validation of a Swedish version , 1998, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[20]  B. Beynnon,et al.  Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--development of a self-administered outcome measure. , 1998, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[21]  P. Franklin,et al.  A 12-item short form of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness. , 2019, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[22]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .