Why Does the Negative Impact of Inconsistent Knowledge on Web Navigation Persist?

Farris (2003) discovered that users had greater difficulty finding information on a Web site when their prior knowledge was inconsistent with the Web site's content, relative to when their knowledge was consistent with it. In addition, he found that this difficulty was persistent over trials. To explain this persistence, Farris offered a schema-based account, which instantiated inconsistency in a single manner. These studies tested 2 predictions that were derived from Farris's account. Specifically, Experiment 1 assessed whether schema elaboration would be gradual, whereas Experiment 2 assessed whether task repetition would eliminate the negative impact of inconsistent knowledge. The results associated with navigation efficiency supported the predictions derived from Farris's account. The results associated with the choices made by participants as they navigated the site, however, contradicted the predictions. A new account, based on production-rules rather than schemata, is offered that considers both sets of results, because it instantiates inconsistency in more than 1 manner. This new account has implications for the design and redesign of Web sites.

[1]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[2]  Hanhwe Kim,et al.  Spatial metaphors and disorientation in hypertext browsing , 1995, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[3]  Patricia A. Billingsley,et al.  Navigation through Hierarchical Menu Structures: Does it Help to have a Map? , 1982 .

[4]  M. Hannafin,et al.  Cognitive strategies and learning from the world wide web , 1997 .

[5]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  Browsing in hypertext: a cognitive study , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[6]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Spatial versus conceptual maps as learning tools in hypertext , 1999 .

[7]  C. Baber,et al.  The myth of navigating in hypertext: how a “bandwagon” has lost its course! , 1994 .

[8]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Prior Knowledge Affects Text Search Success and Extraction of Information. , 1993 .

[9]  Paulo Dias,et al.  Understanding navigation and disorientation in hypermedia learning environments , 1997 .

[10]  Keith S. Jones,et al.  The human-web interaction cycle: a proposed and tested framework of perception, cognition, and action on the web , 2003 .

[11]  Lynda Hardman,et al.  'Lost in Hyperspace': Cognitive Mapping and Navigation in a Hypertext Environment , 1999, UK Hypertext.

[12]  Sandra P. Marshall,et al.  Schemas in Problem Solving , 1995 .

[13]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  The Relevance of Hierarchies to Learning Biology From Hypertext , 1999 .

[14]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective , 1990 .

[15]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Maps as Navigational Aids in Hypertext Environments: An Empirical Evaluation. , 1992 .

[16]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Cognition And Reality , 1976 .

[17]  Susan Wiedenbeck,et al.  PATTERNS OF INFORMATION SEEKING ON THE WEB: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF DOMAIN EXPERTISE AND WEB EXPERTISE , 2003 .

[18]  Licia Calvi Navigation and disorientation: a case study , 1997 .

[19]  Deborah J. Mayhew,et al.  The usability engineering lifecycle , 1999, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[20]  Patricia M. Boechler,et al.  How Spatial Is Hyperspace? Interacting with Hypertext Documents: Cognitive Processes and Concepts , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[21]  Richard J. Koubek,et al.  An empirical evaluation of knowledge, cognitive style, and structure upon the performance of a hypertext task , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..