Episiotomy: an informed consent proposal

Abstract Purpose Since every obstetric surgical procedure requires gaining informed consent from patient, we have set out to evaluate whether such requirement also applies to episiotomy. Material and methods To that end, we have conducted a thorough search of relevant scientific literature on multidisciplinary databases (Scopus, PubMed, PubMed, Central, Research Gate, Google Scholar) and articles that were published from 1989 to March 2019. The search keys used were: “episiotomy,” “informed consent,” “complications,” “malpractice.” Results The sources that we have ultimately drawn upon, whilst acknowledging the need for a targeted informed consent for episiotomy, do not deal with the specifics of what such consent should include, in terms of information provided and related aspects. Therefore, the authors have laid out an episiotomy-targeted consent form, drawing upon opinions and indications from scientific societies and institutions, in order to properly reflect and document the patient’s acceptance or refusal of the procedure. Conclusions Valid consent documentation may well prove instrumental in staving off or reducing complications, malpractice and liability, and in order to safeguard health care operators from obstetric malpractice allegations.

[1]  A. Malvasi,et al.  Does episiotomy always equate violence in obstetrics? Routine and selective episiotomy in obstetric practice and legal questions. , 2019, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[2]  A. Tinelli,et al.  Kristeller maneuvers or fundal pressure and maternal/neonatal morbidity: obstetric and judicial literature review , 2018, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[3]  Bi-ru Luo,et al.  Risk factors for episiotomy during vaginal childbirth: A retrospective cohort study in Western China , 2018, Journal of evidence-based medicine.

[4]  A. Tinelli,et al.  “Can the intrapartum ultrasonography reduce the legal liability in distocic labor and delivery?” , 2018, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[5]  F. Signore,et al.  The issue of delivery room infections in the Italian law. A brief comparative study with English and French jurisprudence , 2018, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[6]  P. Latthe,et al.  Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, International Urogynecology Journal.

[7]  Lesley Smith,et al.  Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study , 2013, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[8]  D. Tincello,et al.  Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminology , 2012, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[9]  Holly Goldberg,et al.  Informed Decision Making in Maternity Care , 2009, Journal of Perinatal Education.

[10]  R. Angioli,et al.  Severe perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: the University of Miami experience. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  J. Thorp,et al.  Episiotomy: can its routine use be defended? , 1989, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.