The SCEC Phase III Strong-Motion Database

As part of the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) Phase III effort to include site effects in hazard models for southern California, a regional database of strong-motion observations was developed. The observations consist of the peak ground acceleration (PGA) and 5% damped response spectral acceleration (SA) at 0.3-, 1.0-, and 3.0-sec periods from 28 earthquakes and 281 stations. A total of 449 pairs of horizontal PGA and SA observations that were taken from the SCEC Strong-Motion Database (SMDB) are presented here. The phase III database includes earthquakes with moment magnitudes larger than 5.0 and stations in southern California with locations between 32° and 36° north latitude. Observations from buildings with more than two stories and dam abutments or crests are excluded from the database. Observations with distances of 150 km or greater were also excluded. The agencies that provided the data to SMDB are the U.S. Geological Survey, California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program, University of Southern California, and the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. The database also contains site classification information for each station. A first general classification is based on the 1:750,000 California map of Quaternary, Tertiary, and Mesozoic geologic units by Jennings (1977) as modified by Park and Elrick (1998). A second more detailed classification is based on Quaternary mapping in the Los Angeles region by Tinsley and Fumal (1985) as modified by Park and Elrick (1998). A third classification is based on the correlation of surface geology with shear-wave velocity in the upper 30 m (Wills et al., 2000). An arbitrary “depth-to-basement” parameter is assigned to stations that are located within the boundary of the 3D velocity model used by Olsen (2000), which is based on the SCEC 3D velocity model (version 1). This parameter is defined as the depth to the 2.5km/sec velocity isosurface. Special parameters associated with particular attenuation relations, such as different distance measures, a hanging wall flag, and fault-type flag are also assigned to each observation. These data are all presented within the tables and figures of this article, and also have been made available via a downloadable file on the Internet ( http://smdb.crustal.ucsb.edu/~phase3 ).

[1]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  Empirical Near-Source Attenuation Relationships for Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Pseudo-Absolute Acceleration Response Spectra , 1997 .

[2]  William A. Bryant,et al.  A Site-Conditions Map for California Based on Geology and Shear-Wave Velocity , 2000 .

[3]  Scott D. Elrick,et al.  Predictions of shear-wave velocities in southern California using surface geology , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  Edward H. Field,et al.  Accounting for Site Effects in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses of Southern California: Overview of the SCEC Phase III Report , 2000 .

[5]  R. Youngs,et al.  Attenuation Relationships for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Based on California Strong Motion Data , 1997 .

[6]  D. Hudson Reading and interpreting strong motion accelerograms , 1979 .

[7]  Jamison H. Steidl,et al.  Site Response in Southern California for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis , 2000 .

[8]  Kim B. Olsen,et al.  Site Amplification in the Los Angeles Basin from Three-Dimensional Modeling of Ground Motion , 2000 .

[9]  D. E. Hudson Some problems in the application of spectrum techniques to strong-motion earthquake analysis , 1962 .

[10]  Keith L. McLaughlin,et al.  A geology-based 3D velocity model of the Los Angeles basin sediments , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[11]  Walter J. Silva,et al.  Shear-Wave Velocity Characteristics of Geologic Units in California , 1998 .

[12]  Yuehua Zeng,et al.  Evaluation of Empirical Ground-Motion Relations in Southern California , 2000 .

[13]  John G. Anderson,et al.  Potential for Improving Ground-Motion Relations in Southern California by Incorporating Various Site Parameters , 2000 .

[14]  Mark D. Petersen,et al.  A Test of Various Site-Effect Parameterizations in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses of Southern California , 2000 .

[15]  Edward H. Field,et al.  A Modified Ground-Motion Attenuation Relationship for Southern California that Accounts for Detailed Site Classification and a Basin-Depth Effect , 2000 .

[16]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Empirical Response Spectral Attenuation Relations for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes , 1997 .