Spatial variability of digital soil maps and its impact on regional ecosystem modeling

This paper discusses some of the practical difficulties encountered in using generalized regional soils maps such as the U.S. Soil Conservation Service State Soil Geographic Data Base (STATSGO) for landscape to regional level ecosystem modeling. For highlighting regional trends, the STATSGO-derived maps are adequate. However, caution is warranted when using the same maps for modeling at a landscape level due to the generalized nature of the STATSGO data coupled with the inherent spatial variability of soils. The variability of soil water holding capacity (SWHC), within a STATSGO class was quite large with a median coefficient of variation of between 40 and 60%. Comparison of SWHC values derived from finer scale county level soil surveys with STATSGO data showed large discrepancies. Simulated outputs from the forest ecosystem model, PnET, differed by approximately 20% depending on the source of SWHC input data. To improve the utility of regional soils databases for modeling purposes, estimates of the spatial variability of soil properties need to be better quantified and communicated to the prospective data user.

[1]  Norman B. Bliss,et al.  Small-scale digital soil maps for interpreting natural resources , 1989 .

[2]  Andrew K. Skidmore,et al.  Use of an expert system to map forest soils from a geographical information system , 1991, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Peter F. Fisher,et al.  Modelling soil map-unit inclusions by Monte Carlo simulation , 1991, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  J. Aber,et al.  A strategy for the regional analysis of the effects of physical and chemical climate change on biogeochemical cycles in northeastern (U.S.) forests , 1993 .

[5]  M. Sharma,et al.  Spatial variability of infiltration in a watershed , 1980 .

[6]  A. L. Maclean,et al.  The use of variability diagrams to improve the interpretation of digital soil maps in a GIS , 1993 .

[7]  P. Burrough.  Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment , 1986 .

[8]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water properties , 1973 .

[9]  R. J. Luxmoore,et al.  Soil spatial variability and its consequences on simulated water balance , 1979 .

[10]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  Mapping regional forest evapotranspiration and photosynthesis by coupling satellite data with ecosystem simulation , 1989 .

[11]  A. S. Rogowski.  watershed physics: Soil variability criteria , 1972 .

[12]  William U. Reybold,et al.  Soil geographic data bases , 1989 .

[13]  Janice L. Stolzy,et al.  Effects of spatial variability of soil hydraulic properties in water budget modeling , 1977 .

[14]  P. Gersmehl.  MAPS IN LANDSCAPE INTERPRETATION , 1981 .

[15]  Timothy G. F. Kittel,et al.  Regional Analysis of the Central Great Plains , 1991 .

[16]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  Variability of yield of an irrigated crop and its causes: 1. Statement of the problem and methodology , 1988 .

[17]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  Scaling Field-Measured Soil Hydraulic Properties Using a Similar Media Concept , 1977 .

[18]  Jennifer L. Dungan,et al.  Forest ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: basis for distributed simulation , 1991 .