Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition.

The gap between research and practice is well documented. We address one of the underlying reasons for this gap: the assumption that effectiveness research naturally and logically follows from successful efficacy research. These 2 research traditions have evolved different methods and values; consequently, there are inherent differences between the characteristics of a successful efficacy intervention versus those of an effectiveness one. Moderating factors that limit robustness across settings, populations, and intervention staff need to be addressed in efficacy studies, as well as in effectiveness trials. Greater attention needs to be paid to documenting intervention reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Recommendations are offered to help close the gap between efficacy and effectiveness research and to guide evaluation and possible adoption of new programs.

[1]  Lisa M Klesges,et al.  The future of health behavior change research: What is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? , 2004, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[2]  Evelyn P Whitlock,et al.  Evidence-based behavioral medicine: What is it and how do we achieve it? , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[3]  Russell E. Glasgow,et al.  Work Site Health Promotion Research: To what Extent can we Generalize the Results and what is Needed to Translate Research to Practice? , 2003, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[4]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[5]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials , 2001, The Lancet.

[6]  Lisa M Klesges,et al.  Reporting of validity from school health promotion studies published in 12 leading journals, 1996-2000. , 2003, The Journal of school health.

[7]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Implementation, generalization and long-term results of the "choosing well" diabetes self-management intervention. , 2002, Patient education and counseling.

[8]  Lisa M Klesges,et al.  Behavior change intervention research in healthcare settings: a review of recent reports with emphasis on external validity. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[9]  C. T. Orleans,et al.  Evaluating primary care behavioral counseling interventions: an evidence-based approach. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[10]  M. Gribaudo,et al.  2002 , 2001, Cell and Tissue Research.

[11]  A. King.  The coming of age of behavioral research in physical activity , 2001, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[12]  Cathie M Scott,et al.  Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach (3rd ed) , 2001 .

[13]  R. Glasgow,et al.  The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? , 2001, Patient education and counseling.

[14]  W F Velicer,et al.  Evaluating a population-based recruitment approach and a stage-based expert system intervention for smoking cessation. , 2001, Addictive behaviors.

[15]  D M Murray,et al.  Statistical models appropriate for designs often used in group‐randomized trials , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  L W Green,et al.  From research to "best practices" in other settings and populations. , 2001, American journal of health behavior.

[17]  S. Woolf,et al.  The evolving role of prevention in health care: contributions of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[18]  M K Campbell,et al.  Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomized trials: for discussion. , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  S. Syme,et al.  Promoting Health: Intervention Strategies from Social and Behavioral Research , 2001 .

[20]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[21]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Preventive care practices for diabetes management in two primary care samples. , 2000, American journal of preventive medicine.

[22]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier , 2000 .

[23]  J. Sallis,et al.  Health Behavior Research: The Quality of the Evidence Base , 2000, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[24]  M. Brewer,et al.  Research Design and Issues of Validity , 2000 .

[25]  Patricia Dolan Mullen,et al.  Developing an Evidence-Based Guide to Community Preventive Services—Methods , 2000 .

[26]  D. Fleming,et al.  Scope and organization of the Guide to Community Preventive Services. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services. , 2000, American journal of preventive medicine.

[27]  L. Green,et al.  Commentary on the emerging Guide to Community Preventive Services from a health promotion perspective. , 2000, American journal of preventive medicine.

[28]  V. Strecher,et al.  One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials , 1999, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[29]  T. Kottke,et al.  Counseling: implementing our knowledge in a hurried and complex world. , 1999, American journal of preventive medicine.

[30]  R. Hiatt,et al.  A new strategy for cancer control research. , 1999, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[31]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[32]  J. Sallis,et al.  Health promotion research and the diffusion and institutionalization of interventions. , 1999, Health education research.

[33]  Celette Sugg Skinner,et al.  How effective is tailored print communication? , 1999, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[34]  L Joyner,et al.  ADA's (American Diabetes Association) provider recognition program. , 1997, HMO practice.

[35]  R. Glasgow,et al.  A pragmatic framework for smoking cessation: Implications for clinical and public health programs. , 1997 .

[36]  G. Clarke.  Improving the transition from basic efficacy research to effectiveness studies: methodological issues and procedures. , 1995, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[37]  K. Emmons,et al.  Smoking cessation at the workplace: Conceptual and practical issues , 1994 .

[38]  J. Weisz,et al.  The lab versus the clinic. Effects of child and adolescent psychotherapy. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[39]  S M Teutsch,et al.  A framework for assessing the effectiveness of disease and injury prevention. , 1992, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports.

[40]  R. Glasgow,et al.  The need for a science of larger social units: A contextual approach * , 1990 .

[41]  R. Jeffery.  Risk behaviors and health. Contrasting individual and population perspectives. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[42]  M. Orlandi.  Promoting health and preventing disease in health care settings: an analysis of barriers. , 1987, Preventive medicine.

[43]  L. Kolbe.  Increasing the impact of school health promotion programs: emerging research perspectives. , 1986, Health education.

[44]  B. Flay.  Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. , 1986, Preventive medicine.

[45]  C. Basch,et al.  Avoiding Type III Errors in Health Education Program Evaluations: A Case Study , 1985, Health education quarterly.

[46]  P. Greenwald,et al.  The new emphasis in cancer control. , 1985, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[47]  D. Mook,et al.  In defense of external invalidity. , 1983 .

[48]  L. Delbeke.  Quasi-experimentation - design and analysis issues for field settings - cook,td, campbell,dt , 1980 .

[49]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[50]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Generalizability of scores influenced by multiple sources of variance , 1965, Psychometrika.

[51]  E. Brunswik.  Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. , 1955, Psychological review.