Live on TV, Alive on Twitter: Quantifying Continuous Partial Attention of Viewers During Live Television Telecasts

Even while engaged in an attention-consuming activity such as watching TV, social media users often end up paying attention to one or more social media. This is an example of a behavioral phenomenon called Continuous Partial Attention (CPA). Quantification of user attention can be a valuable metric in understanding user behavior under scenarios where their attention is divided. In this study, we propose a generalized model to quantify CPA given a primary and a secondary task, also knows as a distraction. Given a history of distractions, we compute a temporal attention profile for a user while incorporating a penalty for continual distraction. We analyze the model using the scenario of TV viewers who tweeted while watching the ten episodes of the sixth season of the popular TV show 'Game of Thrones' (GoT). We calculate attention profiles and CPA of 438 prolific users who tweeted during each episode of the show. Using this metric, we classify these users into Attentive and Partially Attentive viewers. We compare users from both classes in terms of their attention profiles. We also compare their tweeting behavior during live telecast of GoT to their normal tweeting behavior. We examine CPA across users during an episode vis-a-vis important events in the episode. We find that the CPA metric captures the effects of volume and lengths of the tweets, as well as their temporal distribution.

[1]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  A few chirps about twitter , 2008, WOSN '08.

[2]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Visual attention to television programs with a second-screen application , 2012, ETRA '12.

[3]  Robert P. Hawkins,et al.  What Produces Television Attention and Attention Style , 2005 .

[4]  Paul Coulton,et al.  Mobile phones as second screen for TV, enabling inter-audience interaction , 2011, Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology.

[5]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[6]  Duncan Rowland,et al.  Who is on your sofa?: TV audience communities and second screening social networks , 2012, EuroITV.

[7]  David Bordwell The Way Hollywood Tells It: Story and Style in Modern Movies , 2006 .

[8]  Mehmet Firat,et al.  MULTITASKING OR CONTINUOUS PARTIAL ATTENTION: A CRITICAL BOTTLENECK FOR DIGITAL NATIVES , 2013 .

[9]  Ivan Smirnov The Digital Flynn Effect: Complexity of Posts on Social Media Increases over Time , 2017, SocInfo.

[10]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[11]  Tom Page,et al.  Usability of text input interfaces in smartphones , 2013 .

[12]  Frank Bentley,et al.  Together alone: motivations for live-tweeting a television series , 2014, CHI.

[13]  Quan Chen,et al.  Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Alec C. Tefertiller,et al.  With or without you: Connected viewing and co-viewing Twitter activity for traditional appointment and asynchronous broadcast television models , 2015, First Monday.

[15]  David Coyle,et al.  ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 2014, International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

[16]  George F. Jenks,et al.  ERROR ON CHOROPLETHIC MAPS: DEFINITION, MEASUREMENT, REDUCTION , 1971 .

[17]  Fabio Giglietto,et al.  Second Screen and Participation: A Content Analysis on a Full Season Dataset of Tweets , 2014 .