Enhancing the Visually Induced Self-Motion Illusion (Vection) under Natural Viewing Conditions in Virtual Reality

The visually induced illusion of ego-motion (vection) is known to be facilitated by both static fixation points [1] and foreground stimuli that are perceived to be stationary in front of a moving background stimulus [2]. In this study, we found that hardly noticeable marks in the periphery of a projection screen can have similar vection-enhancing effects, even without fixating or suppressing the optokinetic reflex (OKR). Furthermore, vection was facilitated even though the marks had no physical depth separation from the screen. Presence ratings correlated positively with vection, and seemed to be mediated by the ego-motion illusion. Interestingly, the involvement/attention aspect of overall presence was more closely related to vection onset times, whereas spatial presence-related aspects were more tightly related to convincingness ratings. This study yields important implications for both presence theory and motion simulator design and applications, where one often wants to achieve convincing ego-motion simulation without restricting eye movements artificially.

[1]  F. A. M. Steen,et al.  Induction and impairment of saturated yaw and surge vection , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Colin Ware,et al.  Vection with large screen 3D imagery , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[3]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[4]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Critical Role of Foreground Stimuli in Perceiving Visually Induced Self-Motion (Vection) , 1999, Perception.

[5]  Norman E. Lane,et al.  Profile Analysis of Simulator Sickness Symptoms: Application to Virtual Environment Systems , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[6]  I. Howard,et al.  Vection: The Contributions of Absolute and Relative Visual Motion , 1994, Perception.

[7]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Towards lean and elegant self-motion simulation in virtual reality , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005..

[8]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  The effect of cognition on the visually-induced illusion of self-motion (vection) , 2004 .

[9]  T. Heckmann,et al.  Circular Vection as a Function of the Relative Sizes, Distances, and Positions of Two Competing Visual Displays , 1989, Perception.

[10]  Thomas A. Furness,et al.  Foreground/Background Manipulations Affect Presence , 1995 .

[11]  Reinhart Jürgens,et al.  Circular vection during voluntary suppression of optokinetic reflex , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  J P Landolt,et al.  Circular Vection as a Function of Foreground-Background Relationships , 1987, Perception.

[13]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Visual-Vestibular Interaction: Effects on Self-Motion Perception and Postural Control , 1978 .