Personalized recommendation via cross-domain triadic factorization

Collaborative filtering (CF) is a major technique in recommender systems to help users find their potentially desired items. Since the data sparsity problem is quite commonly encountered in real-world scenarios, Cross-Domain Collaborative Filtering (CDCF) hence is becoming an emerging research topic in recent years. However, due to the lack of sufficient dense explicit feedbacks and even no feedback available in users' uninvolved domains, current CDCF approaches may not perform satisfactorily in user preference prediction. In this paper, we propose a generalized Cross Domain Triadic Factorization (CDTF) model over the triadic relation user-item-domain, which can better capture the interactions between domain-specific user factors and item factors. In particular, we devise two CDTF algorithms to leverage user explicit and implicit feedbacks respectively, along with a genetic algorithm based weight parameters tuning algorithm to trade off influence among domains optimally. Finally, we conduct experiments to evaluate our models and compare with other state-of-the-art models by using two real world datasets. The results show the superiority of our models against other comparative models.

[1]  R. Harshman The differences between analysis of covariance and correlation , 2001 .

[2]  John Riedl,et al.  GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews , 1994, CSCW '94.

[3]  David M. Pennock,et al.  Categories and Subject Descriptors , 2001 .

[4]  R. Bro,et al.  PARAFAC and missing values , 2005 .

[5]  Qiang Yang,et al.  Can Movies and Books Collaborate? Cross-Domain Collaborative Filtering for Sparsity Reduction , 2009, IJCAI.

[6]  Lars Schmidt-Thieme,et al.  Factorizing personalized Markov chains for next-basket recommendation , 2010, WWW '10.

[7]  Qiang Yang,et al.  Transfer learning for collaborative filtering via a rating-matrix generative model , 2009, ICML '09.

[8]  R. Bro,et al.  PARAFAC2—Part I. A direct fitting algorithm for the PARAFAC2 model , 1999 .

[9]  Morten Mørup,et al.  Applications of tensor (multiway array) factorizations and decompositions in data mining , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[10]  Jianmin Wang,et al.  Dual Transfer Learning , 2012, SDM.

[11]  Michael R. Lyu,et al.  SoRec: social recommendation using probabilistic matrix factorization , 2008, CIKM '08.

[12]  Patrick Seemann,et al.  Matrix Factorization Techniques for Recommender Systems , 2014 .

[13]  Yifan Hu,et al.  Collaborative Filtering for Implicit Feedback Datasets , 2008, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[14]  Geoffrey J. Gordon,et al.  Relational learning via collective matrix factorization , 2008, KDD.

[15]  Thomas Hofmann,et al.  Latent semantic models for collaborative filtering , 2004, TOIS.

[16]  Goldberg,et al.  Genetic algorithms , 1993, Robust Control Systems with Genetic Algorithms.

[17]  Qiang Yang,et al.  Transfer Learning in Collaborative Filtering for Sparsity Reduction , 2010, AAAI.

[18]  Tamara G. Kolda,et al.  Tensor Decompositions and Applications , 2009, SIAM Rev..

[19]  Tsvi Kuflik,et al.  Cross-Domain Mediation in Collaborative Filtering , 2007, User Modeling.

[20]  Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar,et al.  A Survey of Collaborative Filtering Techniques , 2009, Adv. Artif. Intell..

[21]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  MULTI-WAY ANALYSIS IN THE FOOD INDUSTRY Models, Algorithms & Applications , 1998 .

[22]  Richard S. Zemel,et al.  Collaborative Filtering and the Missing at Random Assumption , 2007, UAI.

[23]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[24]  Tommi S. Jaakkola,et al.  Weighted Low-Rank Approximations , 2003, ICML.

[25]  Lars Schmidt-Thieme,et al.  BPR: Bayesian Personalized Ranking from Implicit Feedback , 2009, UAI.

[26]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  The dynamics of viral marketing , 2005, EC '06.

[27]  Bin Li,et al.  Cross-Domain Collaborative Filtering: A Brief Survey , 2011, 2011 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence.