Effectiveness of 2-D and 2.5-D FDTD Ground-Penetrating Radar Modeling for Bridge-Deck Deterioration Evaluated by 3-D FDTD

Computational modeling effectively analyzes the wave propagation and associated interaction within heterogeneous reinforced concrete bridge decks, providing valuable information for sensor selection and placement. It provides a good basis for the implementation of the inverse problem in defect detection and the reconstruction of subsurface properties, which is beneficial for defect diagnosis. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of lower order models in the evaluation of bridge-deck subsurfaces modeled as layered media. The two lower order models considered are a 2-D model and a 2.5-D model that uses the 2-D geometry with a compressed coordinate system to capture wave behavior outside the cross-sectional plane. Both the 2- and 2.5-D models are compared to the results obtained from a full 3-D model. A filter that maps the 3-D excitation signal appropriately for 2- and 2.5-D simulations is presented. The 2.5-D model differs from the 2-D model in that it is capable of capturing 3-D wave behavior interacting with a 2-D geometry. The 2.5-D matches results from the corresponding 3-D model when there is no variation in the third dimension. Computational models for air-launched ground-penetrating radar with 1-GHz central frequency and bandwidth for the detection of bridge-deck delamination are implemented in 2-, 2.5-, and 3-D using FDTD simulations. In all cases, the defect is identifiable in the results. Thus, it is found that in layered media (such as bridge decks) 2- and 2.5-D models are good approximations for modeling bridge-deck deterioration, each with an order of magnitude reduction in computational time.

[1]  Christopher L. Barnes,et al.  Improved concrete bridge deck evaluation using GPR by accounting for signal depth–amplitude effects , 2008 .

[2]  Carey M. Rappaport Accurate Determination of Underground GPR Wavefront and B-Scan Shape From Above-Ground Point Sources , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  G. Mur Absorbing Boundary Conditions for the Finite-Difference Approximation of the Time-Domain Electromagnetic-Field Equations , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[4]  Ying Wang,et al.  Measurement of Layer Thickness and Permittivity Using a New Multilayer Model From GPR Data , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  G. Arliguie,et al.  Radar survey of concrete elements: Effect of concrete properties on propagation velocity and time zero , 2008 .

[6]  J.W. Schuster,et al.  An FDTD algorithm for transient propagation in biological tissue with a Cole-Cole dispersion relation , 1998, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. 1998 Digest. Antennas: Gateways to the Global Network. Held in conjunction with: USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting (Cat. No.98CH36.

[7]  Dennis M. Sullivan Exceeding the Courant condition with the FDTD method , 1996 .

[8]  C. Rappaport,et al.  FDTD wave propagation in dispersive soil using a single pole conductivity model , 1999 .

[9]  Jean-Pierre Berenger,et al.  A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves , 1994 .

[10]  C. M. Rappaport,et al.  Specifying PML conductivities by considering numerical reflection dependencies , 2000 .

[11]  Y. Hao,et al.  Two novel FDTD based UWB indoor propagation models , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Ultra-Wideband.

[12]  K. Yee Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell's equations in isotropic media , 1966 .

[13]  Yide Wang,et al.  Thin-Pavement Thickness Estimation Using GPR With High-Resolution and Superresolution Methods , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[15]  Fernando L. Teixeira,et al.  Dispersion-relation-preserving FDTD algorithms for large-scale three-dimensional problems , 2003 .

[16]  D G Manning,et al.  DETECTING DETERIORATION IN ASPHALT-COVERED BRIDGE DECKS , 1982 .

[17]  R. Luebbers,et al.  The Finite Difference Time Domain Method for Electromagnetics , 1993 .