A Novel Immunoassay Using Recombinant Allergens Simplifies Peanut Allergy Diagnosis

Background: Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) is currently considered the gold standard for peanut allergy diagnosis. However, this procedure that requires the hospitalization of patients, mostly children, in specialized centers for oral exposure to allergens may cause severe reactions requiring emergency measures. Thus, a simpler and safer diagnosis procedure is needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new set of in vitro blood tests for peanut allergy. Methods: The levels of IgE directed towards peanut extract and recombinant peanut allergens Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3, Ara h 6, Ara h 7, and Ara h 8 were measured in 3 groups of patients enrolled at 2 independent centers: patients with proven peanut allergy (n = 166); pollen-sensitized subjects without peanut allergy (n = 61), and control subjects without allergic disease (n = 10). Results: Seventy-nine percent of the pollen-sensitized patients showed IgE binding to peanut, despite their tolerance to peanut. In contrast, combining the results of specific IgE to peanut extract and to recombinant Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 yielded a peanut allergy diagnosis with a 98% sensitivity and an 85% specificity at a positivity threshold of 0.10 kU/l. Use of a threshold of 0.23 kU/l for recombinant Ara h 2 increased specificity (96%) at the cost of sensitivity (93%). Conclusion: A simple blood test can be used to diagnose peanut allergy with a high level of precision. However, DBPCFC will remain useful for the few cases where immunological and clinical observations yield conflicting results.

[1]  D. Moneret-vautrin,et al.  Peanut Allergy Diagnosis in the Context of Grass Pollen Sensitization for 125 Patients: Roles of Peanut and Cross-Reactive Carbohydrate Determinants Specific IgE , 2009, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[2]  H. Sampson,et al.  Peanut allergy: emerging concepts and approaches for an apparent epidemic. , 2007, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[3]  H. Malandain,et al.  The influence of carbohydrate structures present in common allergen sources on specific IgE results. , 2007, European annals of allergy and clinical immunology.

[4]  A. Knulst,et al.  Children with peanut allergy recognize predominantly Ara h2 and Ara h6, which remains stable over time , 2007, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[5]  J. Redzic,et al.  Contribution of Ara h 2 to peanut‐specific, immunoglobulin E‐mediated, cell activation , 2007, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[6]  S. Prescott,et al.  Skin prick testing predicts peanut challenge outcome in previously allergic or sensitized children with low serum peanut‐specific IgE antibody concentration , 2007, Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology.

[7]  E. Knol,et al.  Does skin prick test reactivity to purified allergens correlate with clinical severity of peanut allergy? , 2007, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[8]  I. Glaspole,et al.  IgE cross-reactivity between the major peanut allergen Ara h 2 and tree nut allergens. , 2007, Molecular immunology.

[9]  A. Burks,et al.  Predictive value of skin prick tests using recombinant allergens for diagnosis of peanut allergy. , 2006, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[10]  C. Bindslev‐Jensen,et al.  The prevalence of peanut sensitization and the association to pollen sensitization in a cohort of unselected adolescents – The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on Atopic Diseases and Dermatitis (TOACS) , 2005, Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology.

[11]  B. Niggemann,et al.  The predictive value of the skin prick test weal size for the outcome of oral food challenges , 2005, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[12]  G. Roberts,et al.  Diagnosing peanut allergy with skin prick and specific IgE testing. , 2005, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[13]  A. Colver,et al.  Severe food‐allergic reactions in children across the UK and Ireland, 1998–2000 , 2005, Acta paediatrica.

[14]  A. Burks,et al.  Comparative potency of Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 in immunochemical and functional assays of allergenicity. , 2005, Clinical immunology.

[15]  J. Crane,et al.  Quantitative measurement of IgE antibodies to purified allergens using streptavidin linked to a high-capacity solid phase. , 2005, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[16]  E. Knol,et al.  Purification and immunoglobulin E‐binding properties of peanut allergen Ara h 6: evidence for cross‐reactivity with Ara h 2 , 2005, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[17]  R. Van Ree,et al.  Ara h 8, a Bet v 1-homologous allergen from peanut, is a major allergen in patients with combined birch pollen and peanut allergy. , 2004, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[18]  U. Bengtsson,et al.  Specific immunoglobulin E antibodies to peanut over time in relation to peanut intake, symptoms and age , 2004, Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology.

[19]  A. Knulst,et al.  Relevance of Ara h1, Ara h2 and Ara h3 in peanut‐allergic patients, as determined by immunoglobulin E Western blotting, basophil–histamine release and intracutaneous testing: Ara h2 is the most important peanut allergen , 2004, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[20]  A. Burks,et al.  Serological characteristics of peanut allergy in children , 2003, Allergy.

[21]  A. Burks,et al.  The natural progression of peanut allergy: Resolution and the possibility of recurrence. , 2003, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[22]  N Franklin Adkinson,et al.  23. Clinical laboratory assessment of IgE-dependent hypersensitivity. , 2003, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[23]  R. Van Ree,et al.  Carbohydrate Epitopes and Their Relevance for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Allergic Diseases , 2002, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[24]  M. Abbal,et al.  Improved screening for peanut allergy by the combined use of skin prick tests and specific IgE assays. , 2002, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[25]  S. Scheurer,et al.  Patient-tailored cloning of allergens by phage display: peanut (Arachis hypogaea) profilin, a food allergen derived from a rare mRNA. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[26]  H. Sampson Utility of food-specific IgE concentrations in predicting symptomatic food allergy. , 2001, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[27]  D. Hill,et al.  Specificity of allergen skin testing in predicting positive open food challenges to milk, egg and peanut in children , 2000, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[28]  J. Barnes,et al.  Analytic precision and accuracy of commercial immunoassays for specific IgE: establishing a standard. , 2000, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[29]  S. Sicherer Food allergy: When and how to perform oral food challenges , 1999, Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology.

[30]  H. Sampson,et al.  Relationship between food-specific IgE concentrations and the risk of positive food challenges in children and adolescents. , 1997, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[31]  R. Van Ree,et al.  Poor biologic activity of cross-reactive IgE directed to carbohydrate determinants of glycoproteins. , 1997, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[32]  R. Bush,et al.  Comparison of commercial peanut skin test extracts. , 1995, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[33]  B. Niggemann,et al.  Proposals for standardization of oral food challenge tests in infants and children , 1994, Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology.