Separable effects of semantic priming and imageability on word processing in human cortex.

Understanding the neural representation of semantic concepts is at the core of understanding human knowledge and experience. Competing cognitive theories suggest that these neural representations are based on either a unitary semantic code or on multiple semantic codes. We contrasted these theories using event-related fMRI in a semantic priming study. Pairs of words were presented that were either semantically related or unrelated and were either high or low imageable. The unitary view predicts that there should be little or no difference between neural activity evoked by high and low imageable words when presented in a related context, but large differences in neural activity when there is an unrelated context. In contrast to this view, we provide evidence for functionally and anatomically separable effects of context and imageability in human cortex, suggesting that semantic knowledge consists of multiple representational codes.

[1]  P. Holcomb.  Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[2]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Neural pathways involved in the processing of concrete and abstract words , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[3]  D. Schacter,et al.  Functional MRI evidence for a role of frontal and inferior temporal cortex in amodal components of priming. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  A. Nobre,et al.  The anatomy and time course of semantic priming investigated by fMRI and ERPs , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Recovering Meaning Left Prefrontal Cortex Guides Controlled Semantic Retrieval , 2001, Neuron.

[6]  J. Haxby,et al.  Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Farah,et al.  Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Understanding ambiguous words in sentence contexts: electrophysiological evidence for delayed contextual selection in Broca’s aphasia , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  D. Schacter,et al.  Priming and the Brain , 1998, Neuron.

[10]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  Effects of Repetition and Competition on Activity in Left Prefrontal Cortex during Word Generation , 1999, Neuron.

[11]  J. Richardson,et al.  Concreteness and Imageability , 1975 .

[12]  E. Warrington.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology the Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory the Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory , 2022 .

[13]  P. T. Fox,et al.  Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing , 1988, Nature.

[14]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[15]  J. Desmond,et al.  Functional Specialization for Semantic and Phonological Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex , 1999, NeuroImage.

[16]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[17]  Christine D. Wilson,et al.  Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  A. Paivio.  Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. , 1991 .

[19]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  J. Kounios,et al.  Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  F. Miezin,et al.  Functional anatomical studies of explicit and implicit memory retrieval tasks , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  R. Knight,et al.  Separable effects of priming and imageability on word processing: an ERP study. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  D. Kieras.  Beyond pictures and words: Alternative information-processing models for imagery effect in verbal memory , 1978 .

[24]  R. Buckner,et al.  Common Prefrontal Regions Coactivate with Dissociable Posterior Regions during Controlled Semantic and Phonological Tasks , 2002, Neuron.

[25]  R. Buckner,et al.  Dissociating Memory Retrieval Processes Using fMRI Evidence that Priming Does Not Support Recognition Memory , 2001, Neuron.

[26]  E. Warrington,et al.  Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  L. Barsalou.  Flexibility, Structure, and Linguistic Vagary in Concepts: Manifestations of a Compositional System of Perceptual Symbols , 2019, Theories of Memory.

[28]  Alex Martin,et al.  Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[29]  E. Shoben,et al.  Differential Context Effects in the Comprehension of Abstract and Concrete Verbal Materials , 1983 .

[30]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Frequency, picturability and availability of nouns in aphasia. , 1969, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[31]  H. Neville,et al.  Language and , 2019, Adventure Diffusion.

[32]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions? , 1990 .

[34]  F M Miezin,et al.  Activation of the hippocampus in normal humans: a functional anatomical study of memory. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  D. Schacter,et al.  Task-specific repetition priming in left inferior prefrontal cortex. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The dissociation of color from form and function knowledge , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  R L Buckner,et al.  Functional neuroimaging studies of encoding, priming, and explicit memory retrieval. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention , 1999, Neuron.

[40]  M. Erb,et al.  The Concreteness Effect: Evidence for Dual Coding and Context Availability , 2000, Brain and Language.

[41]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Domain-Specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  Alex Martin,et al.  Experience-dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  J. Kounios,et al.  Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: an electrophysiological investigation. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  Anthony D Wagner,et al.  Executive Control during Episodic Retrieval Multiple Prefrontal Processes Subserve Source Memory , 2002, Neuron.

[45]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Imaginal, Semantic, and Surface-Level Processing of Concrete and Abstract Words: An Electrophysiological Investigation , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: a neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.