Outcome and Histopathology of Secondary Penetrating Keratoplasty Graft Failure Managed by Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

Purpose: To describe the clinical outcome and histopathology of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) performed for secondary graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Methods: A total of 11 eyes from 10 patients who underwent DMEK for secondary PK graft failure at a tertiary referral center were included in this retrospective study. Best-corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell density, and central pachymetry were evaluated before and at regular time intervals up to 36 months after DMEK and complications were recorded; 1 post mortem cornea was available for light microscopy. Results: At their last follow-up visit (on average, 16 months after DMEK), 7 of 11 transplanted corneas were clear. In the 7 eyes with clear grafts, 5 had a best-corrected visual acuity of ≥20/25 (≥0.8), central pachymetry averaged 535 (±70) &mgr;m, and endothelial cell density averaged 1045 (±500) cells/mm2. Of the 11 eyes, 4 required rebubbling in the early postoperative phase; 1 eye was left with a small (<1/3) detachment. Light microscopy of the pathology specimen showed complete attachment of the DMEK graft onto the preexisting PK posterior stroma, with interface scarring over DMEK graft folds and underneath the graft area that had initially been detached. Conclusions: DMEK may be a viable option to manage secondary PK graft failure with acceptable outcomes in many cases. Rebubbling for graft detachment may be anticipated, especially because of preexisting glaucoma conditions (severe decompensation, hypotony, and tubes from glaucoma-draining devices). Graft reattachment may occur through interface scarring.

[1]  R. Verdijk,et al.  Sex Chromosome Analysis of Postmortem Corneal Endothelium After Sex-Mismatch Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2017, Cornea.

[2]  R. Verdijk,et al.  Histopathologic Features of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Remnants, Folds, and Detachments. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[3]  N. Gerber-Hollbach,et al.  Rebubbling Techniques for Graft Detachment After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2016, Cornea.

[4]  R. Mills,et al.  A comparison of endothelial and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes following failed penetrating keratoplasty: a registry study , 2016, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[5]  I. Dapena,et al.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for a Decompensated Penetrating Keratoplasty Graft in the Presence of a Long Glaucoma Tube , 2015, Cornea.

[6]  I. Dapena,et al.  Clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases undergoing Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2015, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).

[7]  J. Mehta,et al.  Endothelial keratoplasty after failed penetrating keratoplasty: an alternative to repeat penetrating keratoplasty. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  E. Haasdijk,et al.  Postmortem Ultrastructural Analysis of a Cornea Transplanted With Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2014, Cornea.

[9]  K. Bartz-Schmidt,et al.  Histological and ultrastructural findings of corneal tissue after failed descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2014, Acta ophthalmologica.

[10]  M. Claesson,et al.  Clinical Outcome of Repeat Penetrating Keratoplasty , 2013, Cornea.

[11]  I. Dapena,et al.  Predictive value of optical coherence tomography in graft attachment after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[12]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty and Hybrid Techniques for Managing Failed Penetrating Grafts , 2013, Cornea.

[13]  Marianne O Price,et al.  Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[14]  I. Dapena,et al.  Incidence of Early Allograft Rejection After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2011, Cornea.

[15]  K. Droutsas,et al.  Learning Curve in Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: First Series of 135 Consecutive Cases. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[16]  K. Droutsas,et al.  Standardized "no-touch" technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  D. Sellami,et al.  Epidemiology and risk factors for corneal graft rejection. , 2007, Transplantation proceedings.

[18]  A. Panda,et al.  Corneal graft rejection. , 2007, Survey of ophthalmology.

[19]  D. Covert,et al.  Descemet Stripping and Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) in Eyes With Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty , 2007, Cornea.

[20]  F. Price,et al.  Endothelial Keratoplasty to Restore Clarity to a Failed Penetrating Graft , 2006, Cornea.

[21]  G. Melles Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: DLEK to DSEK to DMEK. , 2006, Cornea.

[22]  E. Pels,et al.  A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. , 1998, Cornea.

[23]  P. Binder,et al.  Scar tissue orientation in unsutured and sutured corneal wound healing. , 1995, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  P. Binder,et al.  Variation in healing throughout the depth of long-term, unsutured, corneal wounds in human autopsy specimens and monkeys. , 1994, Archives of ophthalmology.

[25]  P. Binder,et al.  A comparison of wound healing in sutured and unsutured corneal wounds. , 1990, Archives of ophthalmology.