The cellular force microscope (CFM): A microrobotic system for quantitating the growth mechanics of living, growing plant cells in situ

As the field of biology becomes a more quantitative and predictive natural science, an increasing need for investigation and quantification of the mechanics of growth at individual cellular levels arises. This paper describes a microrobotic force-feedback based system and its application to the mechanical characterization of living, growing plant cells. The Cellular Force Microscope (CFM) is capable of performing the automated mechanical characterization of living plant cells in situ as these cells proliferate and grow. The microrobotic measurement system employs a single-axis capacitive MEMS microforce sensor capable of resolving forces down to 20 nN (1σ, at 10Hz). A multi-axis positioning system with 5 nm resolution position feedback is integrated into a complete system with a high-resolution optical microscope and a custom user interface for guiding an automated force-based measurement process. The CFM has been applied to characterize the mechanical properties of 20µm wide Lilium pollen tubes while they grow at a rate of about 10 µm/min in growth medium. For the mechanical characterization of pollen tubes, loads up to 400 nN are applied that cause indentations up to 300 nm. The force-deformation data acquired show an increase in the observed stiffness from the tip to the apex demonstrating that CFM is a promising tool for better understanding the changing mechanics of living plant cell growth.

[1]  D. P. Potasek,et al.  Characterizing fruit fly flight behavior using a microforce sensor with a new comb-drive configuration , 2005, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[2]  F Beyeler,et al.  Monolithically Integrated Two-Axis Microtensile Tester for the Mechanical Characterization of Microscopic Samples , 2010, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[3]  J. Lockhart An analysis of irreversible plant cell elongation. , 1965, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  Anja Geitmann,et al.  The local cytomechanical properties of growing pollen tubes correspond to the axial distribution of structural cellular elements , 2004, Sexual Plant Reproduction.

[5]  Jon R. Pratt,et al.  SI traceability: Current status and future trends for forces below 10 microNewtons , 2010 .

[6]  Chun-Cheng Huang,et al.  Optical tweezers as sub-pico-newton force transducers , 2001 .

[7]  O. Sahin,et al.  Integrated optical diffractive micrograting-based injection force sensor , 2003, TRANSDUCERS '03. 12th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems. Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.03TH8664).

[8]  A. Geitmann,et al.  Mechanics and modeling of plant cell growth. , 2009, Trends in plant science.

[9]  S. Suresh,et al.  Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials , 2003, Nature materials.

[10]  P. Schopfer,et al.  Biomechanics of plant growth. , 2006, American journal of botany.

[11]  Anja Geitmann,et al.  Mechanical modeling and structural analysis of the primary plant cell wall. , 2010, Current opinion in plant biology.

[12]  Jaydev P. Desai,et al.  Atomic force microscopy-based single-cell indentation: Experimentation and finite element simulation , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Martyn C. Davies,et al.  Comparison of calibration methods for atomic-force microscopy cantilevers , 2002 .

[14]  P. K. Hepler,et al.  POLLEN GERMINATION AND TUBE GROWTH. , 1997, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[15]  B. Nelson,et al.  Monolithically Fabricated Microgripper With Integrated Force Sensor for Manipulating Microobjects and Biological Cells Aligned in an Ultrasonic Field , 2007, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[16]  A. Geitmann,et al.  Polar growth in pollen tubes is associated with spatially confined dynamic changes in cell mechanical properties. , 2009, Developmental biology.

[17]  Shengyuan Yang,et al.  Microfabricated Force Sensors and Their Applications in the Study of Cell Mechanical Response , 2009 .

[18]  Wojciech Strojny,et al.  Stiffness of normal and pathological erythrocytes studied by means of atomic force microscopy. , 2006, Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods.

[19]  Peter K Hepler,et al.  Pollen Tube Growth Oscillations and Intracellular Calcium Levels Are Reversibly Modulated by Actin Polymerization1[OA] , 2008, Plant Physiology.

[20]  Peter K Hepler,et al.  Exocytosis Precedes and Predicts the Increase in Growth in Oscillating Pollen Tubes[W] , 2009, The Plant Cell Online.

[21]  S. Standard GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT , 2006 .

[22]  R. Hochmuth,et al.  Micropipette aspiration of living cells. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Kristofer S. J. Pister,et al.  Miniature heart cell force transducer system implemented in MEMS technology , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Bradley J. Nelson,et al.  Biological Cell Injection Using an Autonomous MicroRobotic System , 2002, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[25]  D. Cosgrove Growth of the plant cell wall , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[26]  Yu Sun,et al.  Investigation of mechanical properties of soft hydrogel microcapsules in relation to protein delivery using a MEMS force sensor. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[27]  Yu Sun,et al.  Nanonewton force-controlled manipulation of biological cells using a monolithic MEMS microgripper with two-axis force feedback , 2008 .

[28]  Jordanka Zlatanova,et al.  Magnetic tweezers: a sensitive tool to study DNA and chromatin at the single-molecule level. , 2003, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[29]  R. Benkert,et al.  The turgor pressure of growing lily pollen tubes , 1997, Protoplasma.