Behavioural linking of stranger rapes

A sample of serial stranger rape cases ( n = 43) that had occurred in Finland during the years 1983–2001 were studied with the objectives being to: (a) describe the characteristics of the offenders; (b) explore the structure of serial rape; and (c) demonstrate behavioural linkage through an analysis of the offenders' crime scene behaviour using both multidimensional scaling (MDS) and discriminant function analysis (DFA). The material was content analysed with regard to the occurrence of a number of dichotomous variables. The inter-relationships of the variables was studied using MDS. The analysis revealed two previously identified major modes of interaction with the victim: involvement and hostility. Employing MDS and DFA, it was shown that the offences of different offenders were distinguishable in terms of variation between the offences of different offenders and consistency within the offences of a single offender. Using DFA, the classification accuracy clearly exceeds that expected by chance, and 25.6% of the cases were classified without any error. The results are discussed in relation to their practical utility and previous studies. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  A. Groth,et al.  Men Who Rape , 1979 .

[2]  D. Canter.  Offender profiling and criminal differentiation , 2000 .

[3]  Identifying critical dimensions for discriminating among rapists. , 1991 .

[4]  David V. Canter,et al.  A multivariate model of sexual offence behaviour: Developments in ‘offender profiling'. I. , 1990 .

[5]  R. Knight,et al.  Determining male sexual offender subtypes using cluster analysis , 1988, Journal of Quantitative Criminology.

[6]  Susan Brownmiller.  Against our will : men, women, and rape , 1978 .

[7]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion , 2000 .

[8]  D. Canter,et al.  Levels and Variations of Violation in Rape. , 2001 .

[9]  R. Hirschman,et al.  Toward a theory of sexual aggression: a quadripartite model. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[10]  P. Santtila,et al.  Crime scene actions and offender characteristics in a sample of Finnish stranger rapes , 2004 .

[11]  A. Burgess,et al.  Victim Responses by Rapist Type , 1986 .

[12]  Laurence Alison,et al.  Is offender profiling possible? Testing the predicted homology of crime scene actions and background characteristics in a sample of rapists , 2002 .

[13]  Craig Bennell,et al.  THE PERSONALITY PARADOX IN OFFENDER PROFILING A Theoretical Review of the Processes Involved in Deriving Background Characteristics From Crime Scene Actions , 2002 .

[14]  Janet I. Warren,et al.  Serial Rape , 1989 .

[15]  L. Alison,et al.  Vicious circles: accounts of stranger sexual assault reflect abusive variants of conventional interactions , 2003 .

[16]  C. Rader.  MMPI profile types of exposers, rapists, and assaulters in a court services population. , 1977, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[17]  A. Groth,et al.  Men Who Rape: The Psychology of the Offender , 1979 .

[18]  Chris Brunsdon,et al.  Linking serious sexual assaults through behaviour , 2001 .

[19]  James L. Lebeau.  Patterns of Stranger and Serial Rape Offending: Factors Distinguishing Apprehended and at Large Offenders , 1987 .

[20]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[21]  Craig Bennell,et al.  Differentiating sex offences: a behaviorally based thematic classification of stranger rapes. , 2003, Behavioral sciences & the law.