The Association between eHealth Capabilities and the Quality and Safety of Health Care in the Netherlands: Comparison of HIMSS Analytics EMRAM data with Elsevier’s ‘The Best Hospitals’ data

ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that advanced electronic medical record (EMR) capabilities are associated with better quality and safety of hospital care.Methods and FindingsWe used data from the HIMSS Analytics EMR Adoption Model (EMRAMSM) to measure the adoption and use of information technology in Dutch hospitals. To measure the quality and safety of healthcare in Dutch Hospitals we used select data from the publicly available basic set and the safety set of the Health Care Inspectorate (IGZ) and the Dutch Health Care Transparency Program ‘Zichtbare Zorg’ (ZIZO) program. The quality and safety measures selected reflect the measures used to score Dutch hospitals as presented in Elsevier’s annual ‘The Best Hospitals’ publication. The scores of this publication are based upon 542 of the 1516 available indicators from this basic set and safety set. Almost all indicators from the hospital-wide indicator sets are included in the selection, as are a large portion of indicators for acute care delivered by all hospitals. Of the 84 non-academic hospitals in the Netherlands, 67 (80 %) were included in this study.ResultsThere is no statistically significant association found between a hospital’s EMRAM score and their overall quality/safety performance in the Elsevier hospital scoring model.ConclusionThere is no evidence found to support the research hypothesis at this point in time. This outcome maybe the result of a multiplicity of factors to include the (limited) use of the methodologies used in this study, the fact that no fully digitalized hospital (EMRAM stage 7) is yet present in the NL, and/or the organizational competency of the NL hospitals in fully leveraging the EMR to facilitate patient care. Further research is needed to explore these findings.

[1]  Union européenne,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2008 .

[2]  R. Panzer,et al.  Increasing demands for quality measurement. , 2013, JAMA.

[3]  L. Halasyamani,et al.  Conflicting measures of hospital quality: ratings from "Hospital Compare" versus "Best Hospitals". , 2007, Journal of hospital medicine.

[4]  D. Bates,et al.  Improving safety with information technology. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  José Maria Paganni,et al.  Evaluating the quality of medical care. , 1966, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly.

[6]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[7]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Developing Maturity Models for IT Management , 2009, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[8]  A J ROURKE,et al.  Evaluating the quality of medical care. , 1957, Hospital progress.

[9]  Robin C. Meili,et al.  Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. , 2005, Health affairs.

[10]  F. Fullam,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Electronic Health Records as an Enabler of Hospital Quality and Patient Satisfaction , 2013, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  A. Donabedian.  Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. , 1966, The Milbank quarterly.

[12]  Patrick Kierkegaard,et al.  eHealth in Denmark: A Case Study , 2013, Journal of Medical Systems.

[13]  A. Jamal,et al.  The Impact of Health Information Technology on the Quality of Medical and Health Care: A Systematic Review , 2009, Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia.

[14]  Arthur L Kellermann,et al.  What it will take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of health information technology. , 2013, Health affairs.

[15]  Li Miao,et al.  Health Information Technology Adoption in U.S. Acute Care Hospitals , 2013, Journal of Medical Systems.

[16]  Peter K Lindenauer,et al.  Choosing the best hospital: the limitations of public quality reporting. , 2008, Health affairs.

[17]  C. Anandan,et al.  The Impact of eHealth on the Quality and Safety of Health Care: A Systematic Overview , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[18]  Lorren Pettit.  Understanding EMRAM and how it can be used by policy-makers, hospital CIOs and their IT teams. , 2013, World hospitals and health services : the official journal of the International Hospital Federation.

[19]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[20]  Graham Thornicroft,et al.  Evidence-Based Guidelines for Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Summary of WHO Recommendations , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[21]  Steffie Woolhandler,et al.  Hospital computing and the costs and quality of care: a national study. , 2010, The American journal of medicine.

[22]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .

[23]  Martin Hensher.  Acute Care Hospitals , 2008 .

[24]  Yasar A. Ozcan,et al.  Organizational and Environmental Determinants of Hospital EMR Adoption: A National Study , 2007, Journal of Medical Systems.