The Effect of Haptic Guidance on Learning a Hybrid Rhythmic-Discrete Motor Task

Bouncing a ball with a racket is a hybrid rhythmic-discrete motor task, combining continuous rhythmic racket movements with discrete impact events. Rhythmicity is exceptionally important in motor learning, because it underlies fundamental movements such as walking. Studies suggested that rhythmic and discrete movements are governed by different control mechanisms at different levels of the Central Nervous System. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of fixed/fading haptic guidance on learning to bounce a ball to a desired apex in virtual reality with varying gravity. Changing gravity changes dominance of rhythmic versus discrete control: The higher the value of gravity, the more rhythmic the task; lower values reduce the bouncing frequency and increase dwell times, eventually leading to a repetitive discrete task that requires initiation and termination, resembling target-oriented reaching. Although motor learning in the ball-bouncing task with varying gravity has been studied, the effect of haptic guidance on learning such a hybrid rhythmic-discrete motor task has not been addressed. We performed an experiment with thirty healthy subjects and found that the most effective training condition depended on the degree of rhythmicity: Haptic guidance seems to hamper learning of continuous rhythmic tasks, but it seems to promote learning for repetitive tasks that resemble discrete movements.

[1]  Ali Israr,et al.  Effects of magnitude and phase cues on human motor adaptation , 2009, World Haptics 2009 - Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[2]  C. Winstein,et al.  Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: support for the guidance hypothesis. , 1994, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[3]  S. Schaal,et al.  Bouncing a ball: tuning into dynamic stability. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[5]  S. Coquillart,et al.  Haptic Guidance Improves the Visuo-Manual Tracking of Trajectories , 2008, PloS one.

[6]  S. Schaal,et al.  Rhythmic arm movement is not discrete , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  The effect of haptic guidance, aging, and initial skill level on motor learning of a steering task , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Young U. Ryu,et al.  Discrete and cyclical units of action in a mixed target pair aiming task , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Xi Chen,et al.  Training Toddlers Seated on Mobile Robots to Steer Using Force-Feedback Joystick , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[10]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. , 1997, Science.

[11]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Optimal control of a hybrid rhythmic-discrete task: the bouncing ball revisited. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  J. Duysens,et al.  The breakdown of Fitts’ law in rapid, reciprocal aiming movements , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Laura Marchal-Crespo,et al.  A robotic wheelchair trainer: design overview and a feasibility study , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[14]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Haptic Feedback Enhances Force Skill Learning , 2007, Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07).

[15]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Human-robot cooperative movement training: Learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[16]  Frank Tendick,et al.  Haptic guidance: experimental evaluation of a haptic training method for a perceptual motor skill , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[17]  Peter Wolf,et al.  The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  S.J. Harkema,et al.  A Robot and Control Algorithm That Can Synchronously Assist in Naturalistic Motion During Body-Weight-Supported Gait Training Following Neurologic Injury , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Vittorio Sanguineti,et al.  Robot-assisted intermanual transfer of handwriting skills. , 2012, Human movement science.

[20]  J. D. McGaugh Memory--a century of consolidation. , 2000, Science.

[21]  Abhishek Gupta,et al.  Shared Control in Haptic Systems for Performance Enhancement and Training , 2006 .

[22]  C. Bazile,et al.  Mixed control for perception and action: timing and error correction in rhythmic ball-bouncing , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Bouncing between Model and Data: Stability, Passivity, and Optimality in Hybrid Dynamics , 2010, Journal of motor behavior.

[24]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[25]  Philippe Lefèvre,et al.  Control of bimanual rhythmic movements: trading efficiency for robustness depending on the context , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Effect of robotic guidance on motor learning of a timing task , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[27]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  N. Hogan,et al.  On rhythmic and discrete movements: reflections, definitions and implications for motor control , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  Heather Carnahan,et al.  Motor Learning Perspectives on Haptic Training for the Upper Extremities , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[30]  Y. Guiard On Fitts's and Hooke's laws: simple harmonic movement in upper-limb cyclical aiming. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[31]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  The Influence of Robotic Guidance on Different Types of Motor Timing , 2013, Journal of motor behavior.

[32]  J. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .

[33]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[34]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Optimierung. Statische, dynamische, stochastische Verfahren für die Anwendung , 2012 .

[35]  D. Sternad,et al.  Actively tracking ‘passive’ stability in a ball bouncing task , 2003, Brain Research.

[36]  D. Sternad,et al.  Stability and variability: indicators for passive stability and active control in a rhythmic task. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  D. Sternad,et al.  Control of ball-racket interactions in rhythmic propulsion of elastic and non-elastic balls , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  The Task-Dependent Efficacy of Shared-Control Haptic Guidance Paradigms , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[39]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  The influence of haptic guidance on the production of spatio-temporal patterns. , 2012, Human movement science.

[40]  Ali Israr,et al.  Expertise-Based Performance Measures in a Virtual Training Environment , 2009, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[41]  P. Beek,et al.  Discrete and cyclical movements: unified dynamics or separate control? , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[42]  J D Hagman,et al.  Presentation- and test-trial effects on acquisition and retention of distance and location. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  S.K. Agrawal,et al.  Active Leg Exoskeleton (ALEX) for Gait Rehabilitation of Motor-Impaired Patients , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[44]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Comparison of error-amplification and haptic-guidance training techniques for learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy individuals , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.