Transaction Decoupling: How Price Bundling Affects the Decision to Consume

In today's marketplace, price bundling is widespread: Manufacturers and retailers routinely offer multiple products for a single, bundled price. Although the effects of price bundling on purchase behavior have been well researched, the effects of price bundling on postpurchase consumption behavior have received almost no attention. In this article, the authors build on the sunk cost literature (e.g., Thaler 1980, 1985) and predict that price bundling leads to a disassociation or “decoupling” of transaction costs and benefits, thereby reducing attention to sunk costs and decreasing a consumer's likelihood of consuming a paid-for service (e.g., a theater performance). Four studies show this to be the case. In two lab studies, the authors show that having a bundled four-day ski pass as opposed to four one-day ski tickets decreases a person's likelihood of skiing on the final day of a four-day ski vacation. They replicate this result in a field study, showing that multiperformance ticket holders are more likely to forgo a given theatrical performance than are single-performance ticket holders, all else held constant. In a final study, the authors show that the decreased attention to sunk costs brought about by price bundling can be either cognitively driven (i.e., it is difficult to allocate a single payment across multiple benefits) or motivationally driven (i.e., there is an underlying desire to avoid consumption). Their findings have practical implications for managers interested in predicting or influencing actual product consumption.

[1]  Pierre Chandon,et al.  When Are Stockpiled Products Consumed Faster? A Convenience–Salience Framework of Postpurchase Consumption Incidence and Quantity , 2002 .

[2]  G. Tellis,et al.  Strategic Bundling of Products and Prices: A New Synthesis for Marketing , 2002 .

[3]  Hooman Estelami,et al.  The computational effect of price endings in multi‐dimensional price advertising , 1999 .

[4]  John T. Gourville,et al.  Payment Depreciation: The Behavioral Effects of Temporally Separating Payments from Consumption , 1998 .

[5]  Scott A. Neslin,et al.  The Effect of Promotion on Consumption: Buying More and Consuming it Faster , 1998 .

[6]  Hal R. Arkes,et al.  The psychology of waste. , 1996 .

[7]  B. Wansink Can Package Size Accelerate Usage Volume? , 1995 .

[8]  Carl F. Mela,et al.  Impact of Bundle Type, Price Framing and Familiarity on Purchase Intention for the Bundle , 1995 .

[9]  K. B. Monroe,et al.  How Buyers Perceive Savings in a Bundle Price: An Examination of a Bundle's Transaction Value: , 1993 .

[10]  M. Drumwright A demonstration of anomalies in evaluations of bundling , 1992 .

[11]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  Deescalation Strategies: A Comparison of Techniques for Reducing Commitment to Losing Courses of Action , 1992 .

[12]  Stephanie Newport,et al.  Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action , 1991 .

[13]  Ward Hanson,et al.  Optimal bundle pricing , 1990 .

[14]  J. Guiltinan The Price Bundling of Services: A Normative Framework , 1987 .

[15]  Glen Whyte,et al.  Escalating Commitment to a Course of Action: A Reinterpretation , 1986 .

[16]  H. Arkes,et al.  The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .

[17]  R. Thaler Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[18]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[19]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. , 1976 .

[20]  Drazen Prelec,et al.  The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt , 1998 .

[21]  J. Brockner The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress , 1992 .

[22]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Consumer evaluation of multi-product bundles: An information integration analysis , 1991 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .