ERPs show that classroom-instructed late second language learners rely on the same prosodic cues in syntactic parsing as native speakers

The loss of brain plasticity after a 'critical period' in childhood has often been argued to prevent late language learners from using the same neurocognitive mechanisms as native speakers and, therefore, from attaining a high level of second language (L2) proficiency [7,11]. However, more recent behavioral and electrophysiological research has challenged this 'Critical Period Hypothesis', demonstrating that even late L2 learners can display native-like performance and brain activation patterns [17], especially after longer periods of immersion in an L2 environment. Here we use event-related potentials (ERPs) to show that native-like processing can also be observed in the largely under-researched domain of speech prosody - even when L2 learners are exposed to their second language almost exclusively in a classroom setting. Participants listened to spoken sentences whose prosodic boundaries would either cooperate or conflict with the syntactic structure. Previous work had shown that this paradigm is difficult for elderly native speakers, however, German L2 learners of English showed very similar ERP components for on-line prosodic phrasing as well as for prosody-syntax mismatches (garden path effects) as the control group of native speakers. These data suggest that L2 immersion is not always necessary to master complex L2 speech processing in a native-like way.

[1]  Mary Grantham O'Brien,et al.  Cross-linguistic differences in prosodic cues to syntactic disambiguation in German and English , 2012, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[2]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  The Interplay between Prosody and Syntax in Sentence Processing: The Case of Subject- and Object-control Verbs , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  A D Friederici,et al.  Prosodic Boundaries, Comma Rules, and Brain Responses: The Closure Positive Shift in ERPs as a Universal Marker for Prosodic Phrasing in Listeners and Readers , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[4]  Kara Morgan-Short,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Second Language Training Differentially Affect the Achievement of Native-like Brain Activation Patterns , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Kjelgaard,et al.  Prosodic Facilitation and Interference in the Resolution of Temporary Syntactic Closure Ambiguity , 1999 .

[6]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Effects of Cooperating and Conflicting Prosody in Spoken English Garden Path Sentences: ERP Evidence for the Boundary Deletion Hypothesis , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Maturational Constraints on the Recruitment of Early Processes for Syntactic Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Karsten Steinhauer Electrophysiological correlates of prosody and punctuation , 2003, Brain and Language.

[9]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: evidence from event-related brain potentials , 2009 .

[10]  H. Neville,et al.  Maturational Constraints on Functional Specializations for Language Processing: ERP and Behavioral Evidence in Bilingual Speakers , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  A. Friederici,et al.  Verb Argument Structure Processing: The Role of Verb-Specific and Argument-Specific Information☆☆☆ , 2000 .

[13]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Prosody–syntax interactions in aging: Event-related potentials reveal dissociations between on-line and off-line measures , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  A. Friederici,et al.  Intonational phrase structure processing at different stages of syntax acquisition: ERP studies in 2-, 3-, and 6-year-old children. , 2011, Developmental science.

[15]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Robert Bley-Vroman,et al.  The logical problem of foreign language learning , 1989 .

[17]  E. Lenneberg Biological Foundations of Language , 1967 .