Responses to multi-directional surface translations involve redistribution of proximal versus distal strategies to maintain upright posture

Evaluation of postural control in multiple planes is necessary to determine the movement strategies used to respond to unexpected perturbations. The present study quantified net joint torques of the lower limbs and trunk in the sagittal and frontal planes following multi-directional surface translations. Twenty-one healthy subjects stood with feet on separate force plates mounted on a moveable platform, translated unexpectedly in one of 12 directions. Peak net torque magnitudes and latencies following perturbation onset were determined as were the relative contributions of each joint to total torque production. Magnitude of net torque generated by each leg varied by perturbation direction, with the largest individual joint magnitude elicited in directions of limb loading. Relative contributions of individual joint torques to the total response were dependent upon perturbation direction. Results suggest that a redistribution of the relative contributions of hip/trunk versus ankle strategies occurs dependent on perturbation direction, with a significant contribution by the knee joint in response to forward perturbations. Direction-specific redistribution of proximal versus distal strategies appears to depend upon the biomechanical constraints imposed by a given perturbation direction. Thus, it appears that sagittal and frontal plane posture-righting responses may not be uniquely controlled, and may instead be governed similarly, with modulation of relative torque contributions among joints when necessary, given direction-specific anatomical constraints.

[1]  Brian E. Maki,et al.  Environmental constraints on foot trajectory reveal the capacity for modulation of anticipatory postural adjustments during rapid triggered stepping reactions , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  F. Horak,et al.  Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  F. Horak,et al.  Influence of central set on human postural responses. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  D. Winter,et al.  Balance recovery from medio-lateral perturbations of the upper body during standing , 1999 .

[5]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  The Mass and Inertia Characteristics of the Main Segments of the Human Body , 1983 .

[6]  L. Nashner,et al.  Human automatic postural responses: responses to horizontal perturbations of stance in multiple directions , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  F B Horak,et al.  Control of stance during lateral and anterior/posterior surface translations. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  J. Macpherson,et al.  Two functional muscle groupings during postural equilibrium tasks in standing cats. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  L. Nashner Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture , 1976, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  J L Jensen,et al.  How do non-muscular torques contribute to the kinetics of postural recovery following a support surface translation? , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  J Duysens,et al.  Spatio-temporal separation of roll and pitch balance-correcting commands in humans. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  F. Horak,et al.  Postural feedback responses scale with biomechanical constraints in human standing , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  L. Nashner Fixed patterns of rapid postural responses among leg muscles during stance , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  William D. Bandy,et al.  Joint Range of Motion and Muscle Length Testing , 2009 .

[15]  Mark G. Carpenter,et al.  Directional sensitivity of stretch reflexes and balance corrections for normal subjects in the roll and pitch planes , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  J.H.J. Allum,et al.  Directional aspects of balance corrections in man , 2003, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[17]  F. Horak,et al.  Cerebellar control of postural scaling and central set in stance. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  F. Horak,et al.  Postural perturbations: new insights for treatment of balance disorders. , 1997, Physical therapy.

[19]  Age‐Related Differences in Lower Extremity Power After Support Surface Perturbations , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[20]  T Szturm,et al.  Effects of varying acceleration of platform translation and toes-up rotations on the pattern and magnitude of balance reactions in humans. , 1998, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[21]  Lars I. E. Oddsson,et al.  Reduced plantar sensitivity alters postural responses to lateral perturbations of balance , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  F E Zajac,et al.  Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques. , 1999, Gait & posture.

[23]  David A. Winter,et al.  Medial-lateral and anterior-posterior motor responses associated with centre of pressure changes in quiet standing , 1993 .

[24]  F. Horak,et al.  EMG responses to maintain stance during multidirectional surface translations. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  F E Zajac,et al.  Human standing posture: multi-joint movement strategies based on biomechanical constraints. , 1993, Progress in brain research.

[26]  F. Horak,et al.  Effect of stance width on multidirectional postural responses. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  F Honegger,et al.  A postural model of balance-correcting movement strategies. , 1992, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[28]  D. Winter,et al.  Unified theory regarding A/P and M/L balance in quiet stance. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  M. Hoy,et al.  The role of intersegmental dynamics during rapid limb oscillations. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  T. Sinkjaer,et al.  Functional postural responses after perturbations in multiple directions in a standing man: a principle of decoupled control. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.