Pop-out in visual search of moving targets in the archer fish

Pop-out in visual search reflects the capacity of observers to rapidly detect visual targets independent of the number of distracting objects in the background. Although it may be beneficial to most animals, pop-out behaviour has been observed only in mammals, where neural correlates are found in primary visual cortex as contextually modulated neurons that encode aspects of saliency. Here we show that archer fish can also utilize this important search mechanism by exhibiting pop-out of moving targets. We explore neural correlates of this behaviour and report the presence of contextually modulated neurons in the optic tectum that may constitute the neural substrate for a saliency map. Furthermore, we find that both behaving fish and neural responses exhibit additive responses to multiple visual features. These findings suggest that similar neural computations underlie pop-out behaviour in mammals and fish, and that pop-out may be a universal search mechanism across all vertebrates.

[1]  Stefan Schuster,et al.  Visual search in hunting archerfish shares all hallmarks of human performance , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[2]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  David J. Groggel,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics , 2000, Technometrics.

[4]  D. Robinson,et al.  Shared neural control of attentional shifts and eye movements , 1996, Nature.

[5]  H. Jones,et al.  Visual cortical mechanisms detecting focal orientation discontinuities , 1995, Nature.

[6]  S. Kastner,et al.  Neuronal Correlates of Pop-out in Cat Striate Cortex , 1997, Vision Research.

[7]  S. Kastner,et al.  Neuronal responses to orientation and motion contrast in cat striate cortex , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[8]  S. Collin,et al.  A spitting image: specializations in archerfish eyes for vision at the interface between air and water , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  E. Keller,et al.  Saccade target selection in the superior colliculus during a visual search task. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Kelly Shen,et al.  Investigating the role of the superior colliculus in active vision with the visual search paradigm , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  Frances Wilkinson,et al.  Visual texture segmentation in cats , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[12]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[13]  J. Tautz,et al.  Do honeybees detect colour targets using serial or parallel visual search? , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  S. Rossel,et al.  Predicting three-dimensional target motion: how archer fish determine where to catch their dislodged prey. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  A. Sillito,et al.  Surround suppression in primate V1. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Thomas Schlegel,et al.  Small Circuits for Large Tasks: High-Speed Decision-Making in Archerfish , 2008, Science.

[18]  R. Segev,et al.  Inhibition of return in the archer fish , 2013, Nature Communications.

[19]  Khashayar Farsad,et al.  Comparative Vertebrate Neuroanatomy: Evolution and Adaptation , 1996, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[20]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  Jay Hegdé,et al.  How Selective Are V1 Cells for Pop-Out Stimuli? , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Stefan Schuster,et al.  Archer Fish Learn to Compensate for Complex Optical Distortions to Determine the Absolute Size of Their Aerial Prey , 2004, Current Biology.

[23]  Ohad Ben-Shahar,et al.  Overt attention toward oriented objects in free-viewing barn owls , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Mark W. Cannon,et al.  Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: Inhibitory effects among grating patterns of different spatial frequencies, spatial positions and orientations , 1991, Vision Research.

[25]  W. Hodos,et al.  Comparative Vertebrate Neuroanatomy: Evolution and Adaptation , 2005 .

[26]  L. Vaina Matters of Intelligence , 1987 .

[27]  H. Nothdurft Salience from feature contrast: additivity across dimensions , 2000, Vision Research.

[28]  Shelby E. Temple,et al.  Effect of salinity on the refractive index of water: considerations for archer fish aerial vision , 2007 .

[29]  R. Segev,et al.  Orientation saliency without visual cortex and target selection in archer fish , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Guy Wallis,et al.  Complex, context-dependent decision strategies of archerfish, Toxotes chatareus , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  L. Chittka,et al.  Visual search and the importance of time in complex decision making by bees , 2007, Arthropod-Plant Interactions.

[32]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Activity in the Lateral Intraparietal Area Predicts the Goal and Latency of Saccades in a Free-Viewing Visual Search Task , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Joris Vangeneugden,et al.  Orientation-Tuned Surround Suppression in Mouse Visual Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[36]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Allman,et al.  Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. , 1985, Annual review of neuroscience.

[38]  K. H. Lüling The Archer Fish , 1963 .

[39]  R. Segev,et al.  Visual receptive field properties of cells in the optic tectum of the archer fish. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Priming in Macaque Frontal Cortex during Popout Visual Search: Feature-Based Facilitation and Location-Based Inhibition of Return , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Response modulation by texture surround in primate area V1: Correlates of “popout” under anesthesia , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.