Propagation of large concentration changes in reversible protein-binding networks

We study how the dynamic equilibrium of the reversible protein–protein-binding network in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae responds to large changes in abundances of individual proteins. The magnitude of shifts between free and bound concentrations of their immediate and more distant neighbors in the network is influenced by such factors as the network topology, the distribution of protein concentrations among its nodes, and the average binding strength. Our primary conclusion is that, on average, the effects of a perturbation are strongly localized and exponentially decay with the network distance away from the perturbed node, which explains why, despite globally connected topology, individual functional modules in such networks are able to operate fairly independently. We also found that under specific favorable conditions, realized in a significant number of paths in the yeast network, concentration perturbations can selectively propagate over considerable network distances (up to four steps). Such “action-at-a-distance” requires high concentrations of heterodimers along the path as well as low free (unbound) concentration of intermediate proteins.

[1]  O. Bagasra,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 1914, Science.

[2]  M. Kelsey “Annual Review of Microbiology” , 1946, Nature.

[3]  E. Seidemann,et al.  Probability model for molecular recognition in biological receptor repertoires: significance to the olfactory system. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  K. Mathee,et al.  The anti-sigma factors. , 1998, Annual review of microbiology.

[5]  G. Odell,et al.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module , 2000, Nature.

[6]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  A. R. Wagner Molecular Biology and Evolution , 2001 .

[8]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[9]  A. Wagner The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[11]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[12]  P Ao,et al.  LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Potential in stochastic differential equations: novel construction , 2004 .

[13]  Kevin E. Bassler,et al.  Network dynamics: Jamming is limited in scale-free systems , 2004, Nature.

[14]  Shoshana J. Wodak,et al.  CYGD: the Comprehensive Yeast Genome Database , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  J. Raser,et al.  Noise in Gene Expression: Origins, Consequences, and Control , 2005, Science.

[16]  J. Piehler New methodologies for measuring protein interactions in vivo and in vitro. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[17]  J. Derisi,et al.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise , 2006, Nature.

[18]  M. Michael Gromiha,et al.  PINT: Protein–protein Interactions Thermodynamic Database , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  Eric J. Deeds,et al.  A simple physical model for scaling in protein-protein interaction networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Hendrik B. Geyer,et al.  Journal of Physics A - Mathematical and General, Special Issue. SI Aug 11 2006 ?? Preface , 2006 .

[21]  Jin Wang,et al.  Funneled Landscape Leads to Robustness of Cell Networks: Yeast Cell Cycle , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  Mike Tyers,et al.  BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Jin Wang,et al.  Potential Energy Landscape and Robustness of a Gene Regulatory Network: Toggle Switch , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.