Reducing the transience effect of animations does not (always) lead to better performance in children learning a complex hand procedure

When large amounts of information are presented in long-section animations, or videos, depicting hand procedures, a transient information effect has often been shown to potentially weaken the superiority of dynamic visualizations over static graphics and to increase cognitive load. In the present paper, 103 ten-year-old children learnt to tie complex nautical knots from either a video of hand movements or from a static graphics presentation. Experiment 1 extended previous studies in the field using a conventional sequential presentation of the knots, under four conditions (long-section animation, short-section animation, long-section static graphics and short-section static graphics), but in a more ecological learning task than the majority of previous studies, involving a combination of observation and practice. In Experiment 2, with the same task and the same conditions, transience was reduced using animated simultaneous presentations. Results showed that long-section animation did not always lose its superiority over static graphics in this type of learning task. In addition to the transient information effect of the cognitive load theory, complementary explanations in terms of inhibition processes, attentional continuity and task affordance are suggested. Animation superior to static graphics in learning by observation and practice.Learning times shorter in short section than in long section presentations.Long section animation did not lose superiority over long section static graphics.Simultaneous animations impair learning of procedure with temporal order.Explanations in terms of inhibition processes and task affordance are suggested.

[1]  Tamara van Gog,et al.  An expertise reversal effect of segmentation in learning from animated worked-out examples , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Richard K. Lowe,et al.  Principled animation design improves comprehension of complex dynamics , 2016 .

[3]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Learning with Animation: Research Implications for Design , 2007 .

[4]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  The Roles of Mental Animations and External Animations in Understanding Mechanical Systems , 2003 .

[5]  Jean-Michel Boucheix,et al.  Learning from Animated Diagrams: How Are Mental Models Built? , 2008, Diagrams.

[6]  Peter Gerjets,et al.  Watching corresponding gestures facilitates learning with animations by activating human mirror-neurons: An fNIRS study , 2015 .

[7]  D. Leutner,et al.  Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis , 2007 .

[8]  Richard K. Lowe,et al.  An Eye Tracking Comparison of External Pointing Cues and Internal Continuous Cues in Learning with Complex Animations , 2010 .

[9]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[10]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Time and cognitive load in working memory. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Jean-Michel Boucheix,et al.  Cueing animations: Dynamic signaling aids information extraction and comprehension , 2013 .

[12]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Cueing complex animations: Does direction of attention foster learning processes? , 2011 .

[13]  Richard K. Lowe,et al.  A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics , 2008 .

[14]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning , 2004 .

[15]  R. Mayer,et al.  When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? , 2001 .

[16]  T. B. Garland,et al.  Rotational perspective and learning procedural tasks from dynamic media , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Richard K. Lowe Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning , 1999 .

[18]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  T. Smith An Attentional Theory of Continuity Editing , 2006 .

[20]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[21]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Creating retroactive and proactive interference in multimedia learning , 2007 .

[22]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Animation: can it facilitate? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Peter Gerjets,et al.  How temporal and spatial aspects of presenting visualizations affect learning about locomotion patterns , 2012 .

[24]  B. Tversky,et al.  Effect of computer animation on users' performance : A review , 2000 .

[25]  J. Sweller Implications of Cognitive Load Theory for Multimedia Learning , 2005, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[26]  D. C. Howell Statistical methods for psychology, 3rd ed. , 1992 .

[27]  Eric Jamet,et al.  Using video and static pictures to improve learning of procedural contents , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Segmentation in the perception and memory of events , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  F. Ganier,et al.  Are instructions in video format always better than photographs when learning manual techniques? The case of learning how to do sutures , 2016 .

[30]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. , 2011 .

[31]  Jean-Michel Boucheix,et al.  Don't miss your train! Just follow the computer screen animation: Comprehension processes of animated public information graphics , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[33]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Aligning Affordances of Graphics with Learning Task Requirements , 2011 .

[34]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning , 2010 .

[35]  Anna Wong,et al.  Should hand actions be observed when learning hand motor skills from instructional animations? , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Sandra Berney,et al.  Does animation enhance learning? A meta-analysis , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Greg Hajcak,et al.  What We’ve Learned From Mistakes , 2012 .

[38]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  The effect of animation on comprehension and interest , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[39]  Markus Huff,et al.  When movement patterns turn into events: Implications for the recognition of spatial configurations from different viewpoints , 2011 .

[40]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[41]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics , 2003 .

[42]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory, the transient information effect and e-learning , 2012 .

[43]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[44]  F. Paas,et al.  How to Optimize Learning From Animated Models: A Review of Guidelines Based on Cognitive Load , 2008 .

[45]  S. Schwan,et al.  The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots , 2004 .

[46]  Emmanuel Schneider,et al.  Static and Animated Presentations in Learning Dynamic Mechanical Systems. , 2009 .

[47]  Mireille Betrancourt,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: The Animation and Interactivity Principles in Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[48]  Dale J. Cohen,et al.  The Illusion of Continuity: Active Perception and the Classical Editing System , 2011 .

[49]  R. Moreno Optimising learning from animations by minimising cognitive load: cognitive and affective consequences of signalling and segmentation methods , 2007 .

[50]  Paul Ayres,et al.  Learning hand manipulative tasks: When instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  Daniel T. Levin,et al.  A Window on Reality , 2012 .

[52]  Filip Germeys,et al.  The psychology of film: perceiving beyond the cut , 2007, Psychological research.

[53]  Béatrice S. Hasler,et al.  Learner Control, Cognitive Load and Instructional Animation , 2007 .

[54]  T. Gog,et al.  A Theoretical Analysis of How Segmentation of Dynamic Visualizations Optimizes Students' Learning , 2010 .

[55]  John Sweller,et al.  The Mirror Neuron System and Observational Learning: Implications for the Effectiveness of Dynamic Visualizations , 2009 .

[56]  T. Smith The attentional theory of cinematic continuity , 2012 .

[57]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Learning about locomotion patterns from visualizations: Effects of presentation format and realism , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[58]  Rolf Plötzner,et al.  Simultaneously presented animations facilitate the learning of higher-order relationships , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..