Home-range allometry in coral reef fishes: comparison to other vertebrates, methodological issues and management implications

Body size has been identified as a key driver of home-range area. Despite considerable research into home-range allometry, the relatively high variability in this relationship among taxa means that the mechanisms driving this relationship are still under debate. To date, studies have predominantly focused on terrestrial taxa, and coral reef fishes in particular have received little attention. We quantitatively reviewed studies examining home range in reef fishes, and assessed the interspecific relationship between body mass and home-range area. Body mass and home range are positively related in reef fishes (slopes of 1.15–1.72), with predators having larger home ranges than herbivorous species. This may be attributed to the mobility and lower abundance of predators’ food items. Coral reef fishes, and fishes in general, appear to occupy a smaller area per unit mass than terrestrial vertebrates (intercepts of −0.92 to 0.07 versus ≥1.14). This is likely linked to the relative metabolic costs of moving through water compared to air. The small home ranges of reef fishes and their apparent reluctance to cross open areas suggest that reserves aimed at protecting fish species may be more effective if located across whole reefs, even if those reefs are comparatively small, rather than if they cover subsections of contiguous reef, as home ranges in the former are less likely to cross reserve boundaries.

[1]  Stephen Harris,et al.  Home‐range analysis using radio‐tracking data–a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals , 1990 .

[2]  J. Fryxell,et al.  Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[3]  Ernest Thompson Seton,et al.  Life-histories of northern animals , 1909 .

[4]  Mollie E. Brooks,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  Jorge Fontes,et al.  Social status determines behaviour and habitat usage in a temperate parrotfish: implications for marine reserve design , 2008 .

[6]  T. Schoener,et al.  INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN HOME-RANGE SIZE IN SOME ANOLIS LIZARDS' , 1982 .

[7]  R. Leuven,et al.  Towards a coherent allometric framework for individual home ranges, key population patches and geographic ranges , 2009 .

[8]  T. Schoener.  Sizes of Feeding Territories among Birds , 1968 .

[9]  W. H. Burt.  Territoriality and Home Range Concepts as Applied to Mammals , 1943 .

[10]  Dirk Zeller,et al.  Home range and activity patterns of the coral trout Plectropomus leopardus (Serranidae) , 1997 .

[11]  Donald L. Kramer,et al.  Implications of fish home range size and relocation for marine reserve function , 1999, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[12]  R. Jennrich,et al.  Home Ranges and Body Size of Lizards , 1969 .

[13]  D. Bellwood,et al.  Fish foraging patterns, vulnerability to fishing, and implications for the management of ecosystem function across scales. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[14]  B. Worton.  Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .

[15]  D. Kelt,et al.  The Ecology and Macroecology of Mammalian Home Range Area , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Han Olff,et al.  Fractal geometry predicts varying body size scaling relationships for mammal and bird home ranges , 2002, Nature.

[17]  A. Hendriks,et al.  The power of size: A meta-analysis reveals consistency of allometric regressions , 2007 .

[18]  M. McCormick,et al.  Patterns of migration between feeding and spawning sites in a coral reef surgeonfish , 2011, Coral Reefs.

[19]  D. M. Webber,et al.  Performance of remote acoustic receivers within a coral reef habitat: implications for array design , 2012, Coral Reefs.

[20]  J. Downing,et al.  Fish movement and habitat use depends on water body size and shape , 2009 .

[21]  Tal Avgar,et al.  Environmental and individual drivers of animal movement patterns across a wide geographical gradient. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[22]  J. Q. Welsh,et al.  Spatial ecology of the steephead parrotfish (Chlorurus microrhinos): an evaluation using acoustic telemetry , 2011, Coral Reefs.

[23]  A. Zuur,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2009 .

[24]  Elizabeth A. Moffitt,et al.  Marine reserve networks for species that move within a home range. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[25]  Alison Green,et al.  Monitoring functional groups of herbivorous reef fishes as indicators of coral reef resilience : a practical guide for coral reef managers in the Asia Pacific region , 2009 .

[26]  D. Bellwood,et al.  How far do schools of roving herbivores rove? A case study using Scarus rivulatus , 2012, Coral Reefs.

[27]  Erlend B. Nilsen,et al.  Can minimum convex polygon home ranges be used to draw biologically meaningful conclusions? , 2008, Ecological Research.

[28]  FreiwaldJan,et al.  Movement of adult temperate reef fishes off the west coast of North America , 2012 .

[29]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Satellite tracking of Wandering albatrosses , 1990, Nature.

[30]  D. Bellwood,et al.  The ontogeny of home ranges: evidence from coral reef fishes , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Christopher G. Lowe,et al.  Movements and dispersal patterns of blue trevally (Caranx melampygus) in a fisheries conservation zone , 1996 .

[32]  R. J. Hamilton,et al.  Community-based conservation results in the recovery of reef fish spawning aggregations in the Coral Triangle , 2011 .

[33]  T. J. Webb,et al.  Marine and terrestrial ecology: unifying concepts, revealing differences. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  D. Kramer,et al.  Movements of Fishes Within and Among Fringing Coral Reefs in Barbados , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[35]  Sandro Lovari,et al.  Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[36]  P. Aspinall,et al.  Patterns of Migration , 2016 .

[37]  Bai-lian Li,et al.  Why do population density and inverse home range scale differently with body size?: Implications for ecosystem stability , 2005 .

[38]  J. Videler,et al.  The social and mating system of the herbivorous reef fishSparisoma viride: one-male versus multi-male groups , 1996, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[39]  K. Parker,et al.  Forage intake by black-tailed deer in a natural environment: bout dynamics , 1997 .

[40]  J. Seymour,et al.  Residency and Spatial Use by Reef Sharks of an Isolated Seamount and Its Implications for Conservation , 2012, PloS one.

[41]  Carl G. Meyer,et al.  Differential movement patterns and site fidelity among trophic groups of reef fishes in a Hawaiian marine protected area , 2010 .

[42]  M. Vanni.  Nutrient Cycling by Animals in Freshwater Ecosystems , 2002 .

[43]  F. Bunnell,et al.  Home Range and Body Weight-- A Reevaluation , 2007 .

[44]  S. Palumbi,et al.  MARINE RESERVES AND OCEAN NEIGHBORHOODS: The Spatial Scale of Marine Populations and Their Management , 2004 .

[45]  J. Claisse,et al.  Conventional tagging and acoustic telemetry of a small surgeonfish, Zebrasoma flavescens, in a structurally complex coral reef environment , 2011, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[46]  P. Kappeler,et al.  Effects of Seasonal Water Scarcity on the Ranging Behavior of Eulemur fulvus rufus , 2004, International Journal of Primatology.

[47]  Alistair J. Hobday,et al.  Automated acoustic tracking of aquatic animals: scales, design and deployment of listening station arrays , 2006 .

[48]  J. M. Fryxell,et al.  Foraging theory upscaled: the behavioural ecology of herbivore movement , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  E. F. Cagua,et al.  Topography and biological noise determine acoustic detectability on coral reefs , 2013, Coral Reefs.

[50]  Samraat Pawar,et al.  Dimensionality of consumer search space drives trophic interaction strengths , 2012, Nature.

[51]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  The home-range concept: are traditional estimators still relevant with modern telemetry technology? , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  A. Harestad,et al.  Home Range and Body Weight‐‐A Reevaluation , 1979 .

[53]  D. Bellwood,et al.  Unconstrained by the clock? Plasticity of diel activity rhythm in a tropical reef fish, Siganus lineatus , 2011 .

[54]  A. Basset.  Body Size-Related Coexistence: An Approach Through Allometric Constraints on Home-Range Use , 1995 .

[55]  C. K. Minns.  Allometry of home range size in lake and river fishes , 1995 .

[56]  Robert S. Stawski,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (2nd Edition) , 2013 .

[57]  W. Fagan,et al.  Population and Community Consequences of Spatial Subsidies Derived from Central‐Place Foraging , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[58]  Walter Jetz,et al.  The Scaling of Animal Space Use , 2004, Science.

[59]  B. McNab,et al.  Bioenergetics and the Determination of Home Range Size , 1963, The American Naturalist.

[60]  T. J. Walker,et al.  The Evolutionary Ecology of Animal Migration , 1978 .

[61]  F. Fernandez,et al.  A comparison of trapping- and radiotelemetry-based estimates of home range of the neotropical opossum Philander frenatus , 2009 .

[62]  D. Raffaelli,et al.  Do marine and terrestrial ecologists do it differently? : Bridging the gap between aquatic and terrestrial ecology , 2005 .

[63]  R. Steneck,et al.  Critical science gaps impede use of no-take fishery reserves. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[64]  S. Saïd,et al.  The Influence of Landscape Structure on Female Roe Deer Home-range Size , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[65]  Peter N. Laver,et al.  A Critical Review of Home Range Studies , 2008 .

[66]  Arild O. Gautestad,et al.  The home range ghost , 1995 .

[67]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models , 2013 .

[68]  E. Civantos,et al.  Home-range ecology, aggressive behaviour, and survival in juvenile lizards, Psammodromus algirus , 2000 .

[69]  Herbivorous fishes, ecosystem function and mobile links on coral reefs , 2014, Coral Reefs.

[70]  W. Calder.  Size, Function, and Life History , 1988 .

[71]  Stephania K. Bolden.  Using Ultrasonic Telemetry to Determine Home Range of a Coral-Reef Fish , 2001 .

[72]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[73]  Steven W. Buskirk,et al.  HOME RANGE, TIME, AND BODY SIZE IN MAMMALS' , 1986 .

[74]  Magnus Nyström,et al.  Spatial Resilience of Coral Reefs , 2001, Ecosystems.

[75]  J. Savitz,et al.  Diel and seasonal utilization of home ranges in a small lake by smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui) , 1993 .

[76]  S. Ernest,et al.  Relationships between body size and abundance in ecology. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[77]  Frank M. Schurr,et al.  An allometric model of home range formation explains the structuring of animal communities exploiting heterogeneous resources , 2011 .

[78]  M. Shaffer.  Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation , 1981 .

[79]  Katrine Turgeon,et al.  Functional connectivity from a reef fish perspective: behavioral tactics for moving in a fragmented landscape. , 2010, Ecology.