Robust movement segmentation by combining multiple sources of information

One of the first steps in analyzing kinematic data is determining the beginning and end of movement segments. This is often done automatically on the basis of one parameter (such as a speed minimum) and subsequently corrections are made if visual inspection of other kinematic parameters suggests that the obtained value was incorrect. We argue that in many cases it is impossible to find a satisfactory endpoint for all possible movement segments within an experiment using a single parameter because the intuition about the end of a segment is based on multiple criteria. Therefore by taking the maximum of an objective function based on multiple sources of information one can find the best possible time point to call the endpoint. We will demonstrate that this Multiple Sources of Information method (MSI-method) for finding endpoints performs better than conventional methods and that it is robust against arbitrary choices made by the researcher. Using it reduces the chance of introducing biases and eliminates the need for subjective corrections. Although we will take goal directed upper limb motion as an example throughout this paper, it should be stressed that the method could be applied to a wide variety of movements.

[1]  R. Sainburg,et al.  The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Grasping future events: explicit knowledge of the availability of visual feedback fails to reliably influence prehension , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  D. E. Marple-Horvat,et al.  A method for automatic identification of saccades from eye movement recordings , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  O. Bock,et al.  The coordination of hand transport and grasp formation during single- and double-perturbed human prehension movements , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  T. C. W. Nijboer,et al.  Choosing between alternative wrist postures: Action planning needs perception , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Modulation of grip force with load force during point-to-point arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Parieto-Frontal Connectivity during Visually Guided Grasping , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  L. Fogassi,et al.  Prehension movements directed to approaching objects: Influence of stimulus velocity on the transport and the grasp components , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Eli Brenner,et al.  On the relation between object shape and grasping kinematics. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Jürgen Konczak,et al.  The effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping behaviour of children , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  P. Baraduc,et al.  Hand orientation for grasping depends on the direction of the reaching movement , 2000, Brain Research.

[12]  Andrea H. Mason,et al.  Target viewing time and velocity effects on prehension , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  The coordination patterns observed when two hands reach-to-grasp separate objects , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  C. V. D. Kamp,et al.  Prehension is really reaching and grasping , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Grasping the Müller–Lyer illusion: not a change in perceived length , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  R. Palluel-Germain,et al.  Influence of visual constraints in the trajectory formation of grasping movements , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  C. Vomscheid,et al.  Analysis of eye tracking movements using innovations generated by a Kalman filter , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[18]  K. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Illusion effects on grasping are temporally constant not dynamic. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  C. Hesse,et al.  Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: No shift from dorsal to ventral control , 2009, Neuropsychologia.