Nucleosome stability mediated by histone variants H3.3 and H2A.Z.

Nucleosomes containing the histone variant H3.3 tend to be clustered in vivo in the neighborhood of transcriptionally active genes and over regulatory elements. It has not been clear, however, whether H3.3-containing nucleosomes possess unique properties that would affect transcription. We report here that H3.3 nucleosomes isolated from vertebrates, regardless of whether they are partnered with H2A or H2A.Z, are unusually sensitive to salt-dependent disruption, losing H2A/H2B or H2A.Z/H2B dimers. Immunoprecipitation studies of nucleosome core particles (NCPs) show that NCPs that contain both H3.3 and H2A.Z are even less stable than NCPs containing H3.3 and H2A. Intriguingly, NCPs containing H3 and H2A.Z are at least as stable as H3/H2A NCPs. These results establish an hierarchy of stabilities for native nucleosomes carrying different complements of variants, and suggest how H2A.Z could play different roles depending on its partners within the NCP. They also are consistent with the idea that H3.3 plays an active role in maintaining accessible chromatin structures in enhancer regions and transcribed regions. Consistent with this idea, promoters and enhancers at transcriptionally active genes and coding regions at highly expressed genes have nucleosomes that simultaneously carry both H3.3 and H2A.Z, and should therefore be extremely sensitive to disruption.

[1]  Axel Imhof,et al.  PTMs on H3 variants before chromatin assembly potentiate their final epigenetic state. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[2]  J. Ausió,et al.  H2A.Z Stabilizes Chromatin in a Way That Is Dependent on Core Histone Acetylation* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  C. Allis,et al.  Histone H3 variants and their potential role in indexing mammalian genomes: the "H3 barcode hypothesis". , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  C. Jin,et al.  Distribution of histone H3.3 in hematopoietic cell lineages. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  B. Garcia,et al.  Expression Patterns and Post-translational Modifications Associated with Mammalian Histone H3 Variants* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  J. Workman,et al.  Preferential occupancy of histone variant H2AZ at inactive promoters influences local histone modifications and chromatin remodeling. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  K. Nagata,et al.  Assembly and Disassembly of Nucleosome Core Particles Containing Histone Variants by Human Nucleosome Assembly Protein I , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[8]  Mathieu Blanchette,et al.  Variant Histone H2A.Z Is Globally Localized to the Promoters of Inactive Yeast Genes and Regulates Nucleosome Positioning , 2005, PLoS biology.

[9]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Histone Variant H2A.Z Marks the 5′ Ends of Both Active and Inactive Genes in Euchromatin , 2005, Cell.

[10]  B. Cairns,et al.  Genome-Wide Dynamics of Htz1, a Histone H2A Variant that Poises Repressed/Basal Promoters for Activation through Histone Loss , 2005, Cell.

[11]  C. Bonifer,et al.  The replacement histone H2A.Z in a hyperacetylated form is a feature of active genes in the chicken , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Genome-scale profiling of histone H3.3 replacement patterns , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[13]  D. Schübeler,et al.  Variant histone H3.3 is deposited at sites of nucleosomal displacement throughout transcribed genes while active histone modifications show a promoter-proximal bias. , 2005, Genes & development.

[14]  E. Rubio,et al.  Transcription-induced Chromatin Remodeling at the c-myc Gene Involves the Local Exchange of Histone H2A.Z* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  Brian E. Schwartz,et al.  Transcriptional activation triggers deposition and removal of the histone variant H3.3. , 2005, Genes & development.

[16]  A. Pombo,et al.  Variant histone H3.3 marks promoters of transcriptionally active genes during mammalian cell division , 2005, EMBO reports.

[17]  V. Corces,et al.  The role of histone H2Av variant replacement and histone H4 acetylation in the establishment of Drosophila heterochromatin. , 2005, Genes & development.

[18]  T. Hughes,et al.  Regulation of chromosome stability by the histone H2A variant Htz1, the Swr1 chromatin remodeling complex, and the histone acetyltransferase NuA4. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Steven Henikoff,et al.  Histone variants, nucleosome assembly and epigenetic inheritance. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[20]  K. Luger,et al.  A New Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Approach Demonstrates That the Histone Variant H2AZ Stabilizes the Histone Octamer within the Nucleosome* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  Andrew J Link,et al.  A Protein Complex Containing the Conserved Swi2/Snf2-Related ATPase Swr1p Deposits Histone Variant H2A.Z into Euchromatin , 2004, PLoS biology.

[22]  Philip R. Gafken,et al.  Histone H3.3 is enriched in covalent modifications associated with active chromatin. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Wei-Hua Wu,et al.  ATP-Driven Exchange of Histone H2AZ Variant Catalyzed by SWR1 Chromatin Remodeling Complex , 2004, Science.

[24]  G. Almouzni,et al.  Histone H3.1 and H3.3 Complexes Mediate Nucleosome Assembly Pathways Dependent or Independent of DNA Synthesis , 2004, Cell.

[25]  Huiming Ding,et al.  A Snf2 family ATPase complex required for recruitment of the histone H2A variant Htz1. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[26]  Hiten D. Madhani,et al.  Conserved Histone Variant H2A.Z Protects Euchromatin from the Ectopic Spread of Silent Heterochromatin , 2003, Cell.

[27]  V. Ogryzko,et al.  Immunoaffinity purification of mammalian protein complexes. , 2003, Methods in enzymology.

[28]  Nevan J. Krogan,et al.  A Snf 2 Family ATPase Complex Required for Recruitment of the Histone H 2 A Variant Htz , 2003 .

[29]  S. Henikoff,et al.  The histone variant H3.3 marks active chromatin by replication-independent nucleosome assembly. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[30]  D. W. Abbott,et al.  Characterization of the Stability and Folding of H2A.Z Chromatin Particles , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  S. Gygi,et al.  Proteomics: the move to mixtures. , 2001, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[32]  Karolin Luger,et al.  Structure of the yeast nucleosome core particle reveals fundamental changes in internucleosome interactions , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[33]  G. Felsenfeld,et al.  Transitions in histone acetylation reveal boundaries of three separately regulated neighboring loci , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[34]  K. Luger,et al.  Crystal structure of a nucleosome core particle containing the variant histone H2A.Z , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[35]  G. Felsenfeld,et al.  An insulator element and condensed chromatin region separate the chicken β‐globin locus from an independently regulated erythroid‐specific folate receptor gene , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[36]  H. Ashe,et al.  Intergenic transcription and transinduction of the human beta-globin locus. , 1997, Genes & development.

[37]  A. Shevchenko,et al.  Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. , 1996, Analytical chemistry.

[38]  M. Piñeiro,et al.  Yeast nucleosomal particles: structural and transcriptional properties. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[39]  P. N. Lewis,et al.  Structural studies on yeast nucleosomes. , 1982, Canadian journal of biochemistry.

[40]  D. Burton,et al.  The interaction of core histones with DNA: equilibrium binding studies. , 1978, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  S. Franklin,et al.  Non-allelic variants of histones 2a, 2b and 3 in mammals , 1977, Nature.