Simulation and analysis of the interactions between split gradient coils and a split magnet cryostat in an MRI-PET system.

Splitting a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) magnet into two halves can provide a central region to accommodate other modalities, such as positron emission tomography (PET). This approach, however, produces challenges in the design of the gradient coils in terms of gradient performance and fabrication. In this paper, the impact of a central gap in a split MRI system was theoretically studied by analysing the performance of split, actively-shielded transverse gradient coils. In addition, the effects of the eddy currents induced in the cryostat on power loss, mechanical vibration and magnetic field harmonics were also investigated. It was found, as expected, that the gradient performance tended to decrease as the central gap increased. Furthermore, the effects of the eddy currents were heightened as a consequence of splitting the gradient assembly into two halves. An optimal central gap size was found, such that the split gradient coils designed with this central gap size could produce an engineering solution with an acceptable trade-off between gradient performance and eddy current effects. These investigations provide useful information on the inherent trade-offs in hybrid MRI imaging systems.

[1]  S. Crozier,et al.  Calculating temperature distributions for gradient coils , 2010 .

[2]  D. Hoult,et al.  Magnet field profiling: Analysis and correcting coil design , 1984, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Armin Kolb,et al.  Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: the next generation of multimodality imaging? , 2008, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[4]  M.A. Morich Novel Gradient coil set with an Interstitial gap for Interventionl Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Application , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Magnetics Conference (INTERMAG'97).

[5]  S. Crozier,et al.  Eddy current simulation in thick cylinders of finite length induced by coils of arbitrary geometry. , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[6]  David I. Hoult,et al.  The Ancient and Honourable Art of Shimming , 1990 .

[7]  P. Jehenson,et al.  Analytical method for the compensation of eddy-current effects induced by pulsed magnetic field gradients in NMR systems , 1990 .

[8]  S. Pissanetzky Minimum energy MRI gradient coils of general geometry , 1992 .

[9]  J. Carlson,et al.  Design and evaluation of shielded gradient coils , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  S. Cherry,et al.  Simultaneous acquisition of multislice PET and MR images: initial results with a MR-compatible PET scanner. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Kyle M Gilbert,et al.  Simulation of scattering and attenuation of 511 keV photons in a combined PET/field-cycled MRI system , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Minimax current density coil design , 2010, 1002.3413.

[13]  Sh.M. Shvartsman,et al.  Ultrashort shielded gradient coil design with 3D geometry , 2005 .

[14]  R. Turner,et al.  Passive screening of switched magnetic field gradients , 1986 .

[15]  S. Crozier,et al.  Evaluating passively shielded gradient coil configurations for optimal eddy current compensation , 2010 .

[16]  S. Cherry,et al.  Simultaneous PET and MR imaging , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  P. Mansfield,et al.  Active magnetic screening of coils for static and time-dependent magnetic field generation in NMR imaging , 1986 .

[18]  T. K. Kidane,et al.  Active‐passive gradient shielding for MRI acoustic noise reduction , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Richard Bowtell,et al.  Split gradient coils for simultaneous PET‐MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  T. Ernst,et al.  A simple theory for vibration of MRI gradient coils , 2006 .

[21]  S. Crozier,et al.  Simulation of Gradient-Coil-Induced Eddy Currents and Their Effects on a Head-Only HTS MRI Magnet , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[22]  H. Landes,et al.  Computer-aided design of clinical magnetic resonance imaging scanners by coupled magnetomechanical-acoustic modeling , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[23]  Axel Haase,et al.  Gradient system providing continuously variable field characteristics , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  R. C. Hawkes,et al.  Development of a Combined microPET®-MR System , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.