To keep pace with the overall dimensional shrink in the industry, overlay capability must also shrink proportionally. Unsurprisingly, overlay capability < 10 nm is already required for currently nodes in development, and the need for multi-patterned levels has accelerated the overlay roadmap requirements to the order of 5 nm. To achieve this, many improvements need to be implemented in all aspects of overlay measurement, control, and disposition. Given this difficult task, even improvements involving fractions of a nanometer need to be considered. These contributors can be divided into 5 categories: scanner, process, reticle, metrology, and APC. In terms of overlay metrology, the purpose is two-fold: To measure what the actual overlay error is on wafer, and to provide appropriate APC feedback to reduce overlay error for future incoming hardware. We show that with optimized field selection plan, as well as appropriate within-field sampling, both objectives can be met. For metrology field selection, an optimization algorithm has been employed to proportionately sample fields of different scan direction, as well as proportional spatial placement. In addition, intrafield sampling has been chosen to accurately represent overlay inside each field, rather than just at field corners. Regardless, the industry-wide use of multi-exposure patterning schemes has pushed scanner overlay capabilities to their limits. However, it is now clear that scanner contributions may no longer be the majority component in total overlay performance. The ability to control correctable overlay components is paramount to achieving desired performance. In addition, process (non-scanner) contributions to on-product overlay error need to be aggressively tackled, though we show that there also opportunities available in active scanner alignment schemes, where appropriate scanner alignment metrology and correction can reduce residuals on product. In tandem, all these elements need to be in place to achieve the necessary overlay roadmap capability for current development efforts.
[1]
Allen H. Gabor,et al.
The GridMapper challenge: how to integrate into manufacturing for reduced overlay error
,
2010,
Advanced Lithography.
[2]
Geert Vandenberghe,et al.
Comparing positive and negative tone development process for printing the metal and contact layers of the 32- and 22-nm nodes
,
2010
.
[3]
Nelson Felix,et al.
Smaller, smarter, faster, and more accurate: the new overlay metrology
,
2010,
Advanced Lithography.
[4]
Scott Halle,et al.
Combinatorial overlay control for double patterning
,
2009
.
[5]
Scott Halle,et al.
Towards manufacturing of advanced logic devices by double-patterning
,
2011,
Advanced Lithography.