Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios

This paper uses the concept of a metafrontier to compare the technical efficiencies of firms that may be classified into different groups. The paper presents the basic analytical framework necessary for the definition of a metafrontier, shows how a metafrontier can be estimated using non-parametric and parametric methods, and presents an empirical application using cross-country agricultural sector data. The paper also explores the issues of technological change, time-varying technical inefficiency, multiple outputs, different efficiency orientations, and firm heterogeneity.

[1]  Vernon W. Ruttan,et al.  Agricultural productivity differences among countries. , 1970 .

[2]  Y. Hayami,et al.  Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. , 1972 .

[3]  G. Battese,et al.  Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data , 1988 .

[4]  D. Luenberger.  Benefit functions and duality , 1992 .

[5]  P. Rao.  Intercountry Comparisons of Agricultural Output and Productivity , 1993 .

[6]  D. Primont,et al.  Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[7]  G. Battese,et al.  A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data , 1995 .

[8]  R. Färe,et al.  Benefit and Distance Functions , 1996 .

[9]  Noel Hyndman,et al.  Efficiency in the provision of university teaching and research: An empirical analysis of UK universities , 1995 .

[10]  Tim Coelli,et al.  A Guide to Frontier version 4. 1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Fu , 1996 .

[11]  J. Pastor,et al.  Target setting: An application to a bank branch network , 1997 .

[12]  George E. Battese,et al.  A Note On The Estimation Of Cobb‐Douglas Production Functions When Some Explanatory Variables Have Zero Values , 1997 .

[13]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[14]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  On the econometric estimation of the distance function representation of a production technology , 2000 .

[15]  Christopher J. O'Donnell,et al.  Regional Comparisons of Banking Performance in South Africa*1 , 2002 .

[16]  Hung-Jen Wang,et al.  Heteroscedasticity and Non-Monotonic Efficiency Effects of a Stochastic Frontier Model , 2002 .

[17]  William L. Weber,et al.  Characteristics of a Polluting Technology: Theory and Practice , 2002 .

[18]  Scott E. Atkinson,et al.  Stochastic Estimation of Firm Inefficiency Using Distance Functions , 2003 .

[19]  S. Kumbhakar,et al.  Efficiency measurement using a latent class stochastic frontier model , 2004 .

[20]  G. Battese,et al.  A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different Technologies , 2004 .

[21]  W. Griffiths,et al.  Estimating State‐Contingent Production Frontiers , 2006 .

[22]  Wing Hong Chan,et al.  University Efficiency: A Comparison and Consolidation of Results from Stochastic and Non‐stochastic Methods , 2006 .

[23]  Andrew C. Worthington,et al.  Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998–2003 , 2008 .